Nickolai77 said:
bodyklok said:
Ah aright, seems I misunderstood you.
Evidently you have.
Nickolai77 said:
Although I'm not sure if swapping the word race for ethnicity will make much difference, they seem to be two different words that mean the same thing.
Sort of the point I'm getting at -
Nickolai77 said:
You would have to de-evolve the meaning of ethnicity, blurring social/biological differences in order to make the two words have different meanings.
Ah, but this is what I'm trying to say. Race as a term is meaningless, it's simply trying to describe what Ethnicity is.
Race was introduced as a means of classification for the different 'breeds' of human. It used things like facial profile, height, and skin colour to organise humans into separate groups. That's exactly what Ethnicity does. The difference is that when race was introduced the means classification also included things like morality, intelligence, and superiority.
Race was a comparison thus wise:-
Prominent facial features;
Skin colour,
Intelligence,
Morality, and
Superiority
all measured relative to the locations where the groups were found.
Ethnicity is based on genetic information measured relatively to location. They serve exactly the same purpose but do it in a different way. Furthermore, one has been abandoned by modern science and the other actually forms a part of our current system of genetic listings.
Nickolai77 said:
Perhaps towards something like "cultural identity".
That really has nothing to do with any of this. we're just talking about interracial relation ships not cultural ones.
Biology has sought to use culture as a means of classifying creatures since... well, race.