If nobody else can have them, then the police are the last people who should have guns. Perhaps emergency responders, similar SWAT, but your average beat cop shouldn't.rokkolpo said:i don't like the idea of 16 year olds with guns.
i don't like the idea of anyone except police with guns.
Were you planning on melting it down, as to make peace-sign necklaces out of it?micky said:Snip
Do you seriously think that people who buy guns to go kill someone don't originally buy it because they DON'T like shooting? Also people who own rifles for hunting also do it for target shooting. Before you quote me and try and contradict me by contradicting yourself. I never said that recreational shooting is bad. I never said that its worse than going to kill someone else. That is YOU putting words into my mouth. If you like shooting then go to a shooting range and RENT a gun. Yeah some shooting ranges do that. But yeah you have to be 18 or have parental Consent to do it.Aphroditty said:Yeah, buying a gun for target practice and recreational shooting is much, much worse than buying a gun to go and murder a fellow living being, despite the fact that there is not any need for that barbarism in the real world. You tell the guy, way to be a rational individual and follow your opinions through to their logical endpoints.Krion_Vark said:Your main argument is that you should get a rifle because you LIKE shooting. That is the most retarded IDIOTIC reason to get a gun I have EVER heard. Seriously if you were going to use it to go hunting thats a completely different story entirely.
Yeh, that would be the point that needs to be made, guns are at their safest when you know they aren't safe. I've seen too many people do absolutely retarded things with guns that it tickles me when people call them safe, apologies.bam13302 said:I understand your point of view, and that is the idea, a gun is never safe until you understand that guns are never safe. I know, that is a bit confusing, but thats just how it is. Always take care, and dont do anything stupid with the gun, and nothing bad will happen. Store, transport, and fire them properly, and they are, for all intents and purposes, safe.
High Velocity? Rim fire, centre fire? Armour Penetrating? (That is assuming you can get them in .22, never actually seen them)bam13302 said:bullet size and powder load, i would assume this happened over a short distance so depreciating velocity shouldnt really factor in
i assume it was just a normal solid round, any other round seems like it would be counter productive
now that i think of it, no you cant rent a gun, it sounds quite crazy actually because the person can just run off. so to all of you telling me to rent a gun its not possibleSerris said:the reason I'd buy ice skates or bowling balls is because i go skating or bowling a lot. and with a lot i mean more then once a week. not even on average, but more like bare minimum.micky said:think of it this way, why do you think people buy there own bowling balls or ice skates and not just rent them. im not going to be shooting mice in my yard im going to use it only at a rangeSerris said:there are other ways to relieve stress and meet other people/bond with them.micky said:its better than being cooped up in the house playing video games and its a way to meet people or bond. it teaches responsibility and is a great stress reliever. after having a rough day shooting some rounds down range can make your day good.Rainboq said:Okay, let me ask you this, what good came come from it?micky said:"no good would come from that thing"
It's a bit of a hard situation. on one hand, guns are very dangerous, even with proper care (they're still guns you know). then again, if you ARE a raging psychotic, you could just as well use a big kitchen knife.
can't you like, rent a gun at the shooting range? like renting ice skates on the icecapade. that'd seem like an acceptable solution, you can still shoot targets (in a safer environment if you ask me), and you don't have the gun around at home where it could potentially land in the wrong hands.
i still don't see why you'd need one at home if you only use it at the range though =\
mind you, i'm not even sure if shooting ranges rent guns, but it seems plausible. do you know?
No not really, theres an housing estate next to it, there is some open fields and woodland though. They have been eating the chickens nearby so I have been asked to deal with themJofrak said:Rim-fire magnums are they way to do it for foxes. Nice little hollow point on them and you're almost guaranteed that nothing dangerous will come out the back if anything. I take it for a 6-cub litter nearby you're living somewhere in the countryside?
Edit: .22 Magnum Rim-fire that is.
Irrelevant to anything we said, so, whatever. But I think you'll find that people who buy a gun to go kill someone originally bought the gun to go kill someone, so you might want to rework that sentence in case you ever deploy it where it follows.Krion_Vark said:Do you seriously think that people who buy guns to go kill someone don't originally buy it because they DON'T like shooting?
That's not relevant. You argued that wanting to shoot is an idiotic reason for owning a weapon, but going to hunt and kill something is enough of a reason.Krion_Vark said:Also people who own rifles for hunting also do it for target shooting.
Alright fair enough, I'll let you switch to this argument. But fine, go rent a gun then, that's awesome. Now why is owning a gun for hunting any better than owning a gun for recreational sport? You ought to rent for that too. In fact, a person who has the proven capacity to kill something is probably somebody who should have to rent. Again, follow your logic through to its endpoint.Krion_Vark said:Before you quote me and try and contradict me by contradicting yourself. I never said that recreational shooting is bad. I never said that its worse than going to kill someone else. That is YOU putting words into my mouth. If you like shooting then go to a shooting range and RENT a gun.
Theres a bunch of loop holes in his argument to get a gun but seeing as how he is so in for wanting to OWN it himself he hasn't looked at all the things that he can do to shoot guns for fun at targets.
Considering how this is supposed to be whether or not the boyfriend is ignorant or have a point we just argued for a while over nothing.Aphroditty said:Irrelevant to anything we said, so, whatever. But I think you'll find that people who buy a gun to go kill someone originally bought the gun to go kill someone, so you might want to rework that sentence in case you ever deploy it where it follows.Krion_Vark said:Do you seriously think that people who buy guns to go kill someone don't originally buy it because they DON'T like shooting?
That's not relevant. You argued that wanting to shoot is an idiotic reason for owning a weapon, but going to hunt and kill something is enough of a reason.Krion_Vark said:Also people who own rifles for hunting also do it for target shooting.
Alright fair enough, I'll let you switch to this argument. But fine, go rent a gun then, that's awesome. Now why is owning a gun for hunting any better than owning a gun for recreational sport? You ought to rent for that too. In fact, a person who has the proven capacity to kill something is probably somebody who should have to rent. Again, follow your logic through to its endpoint.Krion_Vark said:Before you quote me and try and contradict me by contradicting yourself. I never said that recreational shooting is bad. I never said that its worse than going to kill someone else. That is YOU putting words into my mouth. If you like shooting then go to a shooting range and RENT a gun.
Theres a bunch of loop holes in his argument to get a gun but seeing as how he is so in for wanting to OWN it himself he hasn't looked at all the things that he can do to shoot guns for fun at targets.
In any event, depending on the level of recreational shooting you undertake, actually owning a weapon might end up being more economical in the long run, and the added benefits of being able to go out on public ranges on your own time, rather than a private range's schedule also weight into the decision. So your argument does fail on on the pragmatic side of the equation, but I presume that pragmatism wasn't the basis for your argument based by the heated ad hominem attacks you slung out there toward the OP.
you've shot them.. doesn't mean yo uknow how to maintain them and keep them safelymicky said:ive shot about 15 types of guns and my dads an ex marine, i think i should be trusted, it wont be out anywhere it would be locked up were no-one but me can get to it.BlindMessiah94 said:Have you ever fired a gun before? Been to the firing range? Know about gun safety?micky said:im 16 and i decided to get a rifle because i really like shooting and i told my moms boyfriend and he said he wouldn't live in this house if i got it and that "no good would come from that thing". hes acting like its a horrible omen like when i get it the world will end. am i wrong or is he just ignorant
p.s. my moms with him on it
I would be hard pressed to give a 16 year old boy a gun. I especially would feel weary if everyone else in my family knew nothing about gun safety. Even if you know how to operate it, that doesn't mean accidents can't happen.
You're 16. Just move out in two years and get in then. Why do you need one anyway? Back when I was your age kids just bought crack.
......the armed forces?rokkolpo said:i don't like the idea of 16 year olds with guns.
i don't like the idea of anyone except police with guns.