Point to note: the argument that 'helmets aren't going to prevent you from breaking an arm or breaking a leg' is entirely specious because they
aren't designed for that purpose. You are essentially saying something similar to "don't brush your teeth because it doesn't prevent headaches."
In regards to:
WanderFreak said:
I generally don't. A lot of we... shall we say "odder" sorts usually don't, the bike courier types for lack of a better description. A combination of personal experience and people you know really shows that I mean they have their place, but really it's more gambling than anything. A seatbelt, well that can save you (though actually mine nearly killed me as it prevented me from ducking one time, missed my head by six inches). But I know more stories of bikers and roler bladers dying from running into pedestrians than any head injuries. Broken arms, yes, plenty. The few wipeouts I've had the helmet has done literally nothing, as even with it on I still work to protect my head. You're pretty much shit out of luck if you take something to the face too.
So to summarize: don't wear a helmet, not because it looks "faggy" but because from my experience and that of people I know.
Not that he was the only one who made the "helmets don't actually make a difference", but that was the first one that caught my eye.
Taking less than 5 minutes on Google turned up this statistic: In 2000, in the under-21 group, head injuries accounted for 62.6 percent of bicycle fatalities in the US. (Funny note- they segment the groups at that age in the USA because apparently, drunken bicycling is something of a problem! Who knew?)
The point being, you probably shouldn't introduce anecdotal evidence into a discussion as serious as one dealing with safety. Maybe throw a little statistics in there to support your position. I mean, stating plain opinion is fine when it comes to video games or movies or whatever, but a subject like health or safety? Just doesn't seem appropriate.
One last aside: in the anti- group, I keep reading comments to the effect of "how many times do you hit your head really?" The truth is
much more than you think: a very close friend of mine is a neurologist with a neuroscience institute, and we've discussed concussions, head trauma and the like on many occassions. A couple things I've garnered from those conversations is that many cases of head trauma aren't from direct impacts, but instead are caused by the snapping of the head in which it hits a hard object, and, secondly, with head injury, even the most mild impacts can kill you [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natasha_Richardson#Injury_and_death]. Think of it this way: You get hit by a car on your legs- they both break. Your torso hits the hood, some internal bleeding, maybe a ruptured spleen... also survivable. Your head snaps down and also hits the hood of the car. You now have a concussion and a subdural haematoma. You now require surgery to alleviate the pressure on your brain. You may or may not survive. You may very likely have brain damage to some extent if you do live.
But the car only hit your legs.
OT:
The whole bicycle helmet thing is a pretty hotly debated. Personally, I figure it's a no-brainer (ha, ha)-- if something as simple as wearing a helmet has even the slightest chance to save my life, why the hell
wouldn't I do it?
And while people certainly have opinions on both sides as to its merits, not wearing one because of fashion or image seems really idiotic to me. But that's just me.