What about these guys?:Gunslinger said:I have nothing against beiber personally, However i do feel that the term "Pop Musician" is an oxymoron.
What about these guys?:Gunslinger said:I have nothing against beiber personally, However i do feel that the term "Pop Musician" is an oxymoron.
Indeed. Taking the time to hate Justin Bieber? Entirely worthless. You just avoid listening to him.Guitarmasterx7 said:Ok no. I will contend that Beiber gets too much hate, but ONLY on the grounds that his target audience is young/teenage girls, not 20 something year old boys. I don't like him because I'm not meant to like him.
But ok, shove Bieber in my face and say "can't we admit this isn't that bad" and yes, I will in fact fight you on that. First off, aside from the obvious and blatant use of extreme digital effects in place of where a jazz or blues singer (or even your example, michael jackson) would add feeling to their voice, subtle autotune can be heard through this song in its entirety. Ignoring that, I could probably count the times that justin goes outside of the same D, D#, C, G# (all within the range of under half of an octave) on one hand. At the end harmony part he does sing higher up (his highest and lowest note sung are about an octave and a full step apart and are hit twice and once respectively) but the EXTREME use of autotune would seem to suggest he can't hold tone very well when exerting his range. Average human vocal range is about 1.5 octaves, making Justin's vocal range as displayed in this particular song entirely unimpressive.
One thing I will say about this music and video is that it's very well produced and the cinematography is good. Justin's acting is... well it is. Some of the best shots in this were wide angled, or silhouetted, or quick cuts. Justin is able to portray the part of someone standing in place and singing or doing stuff in wide angle or being quickly cut away from. Not exactly noteworthy but passable. So the only good thing I can say about Justin Bieber is with an extremely professional production team and a huge budget he can look passable and not sound like shit. Oh yes, I'm so awestruck at the moderate amount of talent that this marketable teen heartthrob can appear to have with millions of dollars in production funding.
Ok, I just wasted all this time typing that out. This is the part where you laugh at me and tell me the joke's on me, right? ...Right?
I'm pretty sure they will find an excuse why killing was justifiedWesley Au said:I hate any artist that inspires slavish non-thinking worship. True, maybe it is motivated by jealousy ( hopefully not for me ) but i cant stand anything that inspires cult-like worship. k-pop , Youtube vloggers and this jsutin bieber. Its annoying. Its like that Jap cult who all mass suicided cause their leader said so. Its insane. If justin bieber kills some guy intentionally, would the majority of his fans call for his arrest? I doubt it.
If that song is supposed to be what he's capable of with his own creative control, I'm sorry but he will always be catering to 14 year old girls. You're not wrong about him playing his part well,however, I didn't hate it right up until he started singing, and he doesn't seem to be trying nearly as hard to look cool as in previous clips. Make no mistake though, this type of song will never compare to something like smooth criminal, which is in no small part because it's designed to be safe, and easy for teenagers to like. I'm more than a little confused as to why you'd rate Jackson (generally considered to have released 'good' music) and Timberlake (generally considered to have promoted bland, samey music-which I say despite liking the guy).TomLikesGuitar said:
Youth is no substitute for quality.lacktheknack said:Sure, he's not the best performer out there, but he's younger than ME.
I stand corrected. Though i very much doubt that these guys would allow JB or anyone "current pop" to stand in their shadows on a hot day lol.MorganL4 said:What about these guys?:Gunslinger said:I have nothing against beiber personally, However i do feel that the term "Pop Musician" is an oxymoron.
![]()
Jesus, I'm not even that cynical... But now that I think about it, especially with todays youth*, you're probably right.WanderingFool said:In all likely hood, Slavery, the Holocaust and Darfur will likely be footnotes to the general public in the future. Hell, they dont get that much attention high-school history classes right now, and that the extent of history people will likely learn, unless they go to college for a history degree.SaneAmongInsane said:Xan Krieger said:He is bad for history because in the future people will look back and think people liked him and we'll all look bad because of it.Not sure if serious... bro.
Yeah.... not the Holocaust, or slavery, or the fact we're ignoring Darfur, or any of that shit.
Beiber man. That's the thing the future civilizations are going to look back and judge us on, our pop musicians.
But pop culture... everyone will remember that... there will be Trivial Pursuit games made about it...
*Edit*
Also, I hate his music, as there are very horrible things one can hear in this world, and they are all pleasant in comparison to that shit he calls music.
As a person though, I dont hate him. It takes knowing a person before I decide to hate him.
Oh yes I can, their music sucked. How they influenced music by sounding as bad as they did I have no idea.Nouw said:'Usually.' The Beatles weren't a horrendous band anyhow; they may not suit your tastes but you can't deny they made quality music.Xan Krieger said:The Beatles survived so the bad music does survive.Nouw said:Have you noticed how it's usually the good music that survives? That is if you consider Justin a 'bad' musician. * Shrugs,* we'll see in a few decades.Xan Krieger said:He is bad for history because in the future people will look back and think people liked him and we'll all look bad because of it.
SecondedEsotera said:He's obviously not a bad pop musician as he has been incredibly successful (in a crap genre). It's more that he's incredibly annoying and I instantly want to cause him pain when I see or hear him.
Weak. [http://youtu.be/9QS0q3mGPGg]lacktheknack said:snip
Now I do dislike him.Marter said:snip
ThyNameIsMud said:Fans must hit the button above.
But that like is negated by shaking the guy's hand. Would have been an excellent moment for a well placed "sike!"Blood Brain Barrier said:This actually makes me like him a little. Any individual showing disdain for Harper is worthy of respect.Marter said:I don't really hate his music as much as most. I don't like it, but it's fine, I guess.
His dancing is not something I'm a fan of. No, I don't like it when the same moves are done by someone else.
The reason, right now, that I don't like Bieber is because of this:
<img height=250>http://www.teenvogue.com/blog/teen-vogue-daily/BieberOveralls.jpg
You wear that to meet the Prime Minister? Get out. Right now.
Now come on dude. In what way did their music suck?Xan Krieger said:Oh yes I can, their music sucked. How they influenced music by sounding as bad as they did I have no idea.Nouw said:'Usually.' The Beatles weren't a horrendous band anyhow; they may not suit your tastes but you can't deny they made quality music.Xan Krieger said:The Beatles survived so the bad music does survive.Nouw said:Have you noticed how it's usually the good music that survives? That is if you consider Justin a 'bad' musician. * Shrugs,* we'll see in a few decades.Xan Krieger said:He is bad for history because in the future people will look back and think people liked him and we'll all look bad because of it.