I reckon it would be pretty cool to have multiplayer, but I would rather have a better singleplayer experiance.
It's not that simple. Time and money expended on a multiplayer mode are time and money not expended on single player, and there's a finite amount of both. I don't see the point of attaching a multiplayer option that's going to be inferior to dedicated multi games already in existence, and just be ignored.manythings said:I'm not a nay or a yay. If they don't it's not like it needed it, if they do it's not like we have to play it. If it's there I'll give it a try, maybe they'll make it good.
this man/woman has it.Beryl77 said:As long as the singleplayer is awesome I don't really care.
I specifically meant XBL/PSN as opposed to local co-op. Split-screen would not work for this game in my opinion. Though as to your AA challenge idea, that sounds pretty cool actually. Perhaps you could be dropped into a city and tasked with finding and safeguarding a group of civilians from invading hordes of husks as you said. I'm kind of liking this idea...AndyFromMonday said:Co-Op can work on PC as well. You could create your own unified network on the PC or hell, just plain use Steam.TheMariner said:snip
And to be honest I was actually thinking of Co-Op missions involving the combat only with little story or dialogue. Remember the challenges in Batman: Arkham Asylum? It was timed and your job was to complete your mission as fast as possible. The same could apply here where for e.g. you would have to hold off a horde of husk's until extraction arrives.
To be honest I don't know why split screen wouldn't work. Care to elaborate a bit?TheMariner said:I specifically meant XBL/PSN as opposed to local co-op. Split-screen would not work for this game in my opinion. Though as to your AA challenge idea, that sounds pretty cool actually. Perhaps you could be dropped into a city and tasked with finding and safeguarding a group of civilians from invading hordes of husks as you said. I'm kind of liking this idea...AndyFromMonday said:Co-Op can work on PC as well. You could create your own unified network on the PC or hell, just plain use Steam.TheMariner said:snip
And to be honest I was actually thinking of Co-Op missions involving the combat only with little story or dialogue. Remember the challenges in Batman: Arkham Asylum? It was timed and your job was to complete your mission as fast as possible. The same could apply here where for e.g. you would have to hold off a horde of husk's until extraction arrives.
You really asked this question? Not trying to insult you but knowing most of the community of the escpiast are Single-player only people, its going to be naturally mostly no.RatRace123 said:Pretty simple do you want multiplayer in Mass Effect 3?
I say, only if it's Co-op, an online multiplayer mode like Halo or Gears would be a horrible fit for Mass Effect, plus I feel that it would just be a tacked on addition.
Ideally I'd prefer no multiplayer at all, but if there must be multiplayer, let it only be co-op.
Valkyrie101 said:It's not that simple. Time and money expended on a multiplayer mode are time and money not expended on single player, and there's a finite amount of both. I don't see the point of attaching a multiplayer option that's going to be inferior to dedicated multi games already in existence, and just be ignored.manythings said:I'm not a nay or a yay. If they don't it's not like it needed it, if they do it's not like we have to play it. If it's there I'll give it a try, maybe they'll make it good.
If you're going to respond read my whole post in the future.manythings said:I'm not a nay or a yay. If they don't it's not like it needed it, if they do it's not like we have to play it. If it's there I'll give it a try, maybe they'll make it good.
It's still just a rumour and since pretty much everything is getting multiplayer it's just one of a hundred rumours that sounded more plausible and was picked up. Co-op would be cool.