Mazty said:Ignignoct said:Einstein was a genius, and had sloppy hair. Therefore, you should have sloppy hair too.
Very generic example of an appeal to authority.
So and so did this, and was smart/had power, so you do it too.To be blunt, that's not a good enough reason.Seldon2639 said:I'm gonna say the problem with both sides is that (a) Aristotle wasn't a good philosopher, and (b) even if he was, quoting him and leaving it at that isn't sufficient. No matter how well-respected someone is as a thinker, he is not the end all and be all of a discussion. Cheeze's point was that there's no proof that Aristotle was right about that, so we shouldn't take it at face value. It's claiming that Aristotle was correct because he's Aristotle, but in terms of classical (syllogistic) logic, it's fallacious.
Your saying his idea isn't good to go on because he's Aristotle. Having studied the Nichomocean Ethics, I know his reasoning for it, which in my eyes makes sense. Therefore you have to explain why his reasoning is wrong, otherwise your just saying I shouldn't listen to him because he is Aristotle.
So in short, explain how you can have a fulfilled life without your health, as that is the point.
Plus Cheeze was asking for the "moral" point, so where better to go then philosphy?
Oh goodness.
Thank you.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.