Due to the fact that you claim he refuses to answer these questions, I will throw out some possible answers. He can take them if he wishes, I'm not certain they will help him, but I saw philosophy and felt like giving this a shot. I am still very much an amateur when it comes to philosophy, so if anyone would like to correct me, please do.Mazty said:For ****** sake, stop digressing.Cheeze_Pavilion said:When the issue is about whether medicine should worry about 'being cold' in picking a definition of disease, bringing up the issue of what I consider to be the source of morality and attacking it?
That's a strawman. And a bit of a red herring. And even some ad hominem.
Are you trying to set the land speed record for logical fallacies?
You have not stated what a source of morality should be.
You have not stated your source of morality on being obese.
You have not stated how being obese is not a flaw, after claiming it is, then being reminded that flaw means imperfection, and poor health would not be in the perfect human.
You have not disproved how any of the philosophers views I mentioned are invalid, and therefore, not proven how it was "silly" to quote philosophers on the morality of being obese, when asked about the moral implications of being obese.
All you have done is digress and avoid answering the questions I give.
source of morality - Read up on the philosopher Hume, "Morals are not derived from reason. Morals are derived from the moral sentiments: feelings of approval (esteem, praise) and disapproval (blame) felt by spectators who contemplate a character trait or action." This essentially states that morality is nothing more than personal bias (because different people will see different degress of approval and disapproval from an action) with no true reason behind it. Therefore morality should have nothing to do with your argument.
Morality on being obese - If you submit to the above you are simply asking him for his biased opinion, which he has provided numerous times.
Obesity as a flaw - Follow me on this one, not all flaws are diseases, but all diseases are flaws. Following that logic, obesity can be both a disease and a flaw...so can we all just get along?
disproving philosophers - disproving someones personal opinion is impossible, however, I can provide a more widely accepted, opinion. That of Hume.
(my quote regarding Humes philosophy comes from a stanford.edu page. If you care enough to request it, I will post a link)