No, I am not overly bent out of shape about the thought of clone sexing, that's just to odd ball for me, and I assume that oddity and the lack of reality involved in that thought is why so many people are quick to say they would.Daezd said:I'm not addressing this post, but your previous onemanaman said:Of course it did. You placed it right out there all by itself surrounded by many many other comments that said the same exact thing that where not intended to be taken as sarcasm.Music Mole said:The sarcasm went right over the top of you mate...
So tell me, without reading your mind how was I supposed to interpret that as sarcasm.
I keep telling people we need to adopt the italicized text sarcasm rule.
Why are you so bent out of shape at the idea of clone sexing? Clone. Same exact person-type clone. Not just same DNA, but different person clone.
Exact copy. But with opposite parts. And corresponding facial/body features to match said parts.
Calm down. The way you're pushing your opinion on clone fucking is downright odd to me. Odder than the idea of doing my own clone. A copy of me.
We you sexed by your own clone or something? the way you're talking about this subject makes it seem as though these types of things happen all the time.
So, I reiterate, calm down! Just read over some of your previous replies and tell me that you arent taking this too seriously. i implore you!
OT: We'd do it like they do on the discovery channel. A lot.
Fuck buddies for life, fosho.
What I am going on about is the fact that people keep terming it masturbation. You will notice that only twice when asked have I expressed my opinion on it, that I find it incomprehensible, and when I really think about I found it a bit abhorrent. Other then those times I only reiterated that it was more akin to incest, and that it is most defiantly not masturbation no matter how you look at it.