Poll: Paedophile sentenced to be beheaded then crucified

Recommended Videos

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Akai Shizuku said:
Internet Kraken said:
Akai Shizuku said:
Sorry, that was a bit difficult to understand, I'll admit. My point was that regardless of whether or not it deters other criminals, it will stop this one from committing any more crimes without a shadow of a doubt.
While I disagree with killing someone for such a purpose, I will say that if you do so at least do it in a humane way. Beheading someone and then crucifying their corpse serves no purpose.
It stops repeat offenses and provides some emotional relief for the victims.

I believe the punishment should fit the crime. If you kill and rape children, I think a punishment like this is perfectly fitting, especially considering that rape gives people mental illnesses (I know this for a fact), and pretty much screws up their whole lives.
That;s not true. Unless you can prove that rape is 100% guaranteed to have screwed up the lives of everyone that has been raped, then you can't call it a fact.

And really, does beheading someone and crucifying their corpse really provide emotion relief for the victims? I doubt that seeing a vermin infested corpse nailed to wooden planks would help them.
One of my friends was raped as a child. She now suffers from borderline personality disorder, depression with psychotic features, and numerous other problems.
 

Silva

New member
Apr 13, 2009
1,122
0
0
Maze1125 said:
Maybe you should try living in a Saudi Arabian prison before you make claims like that.
A good argument - for improving the prison system alongside removing the death penalty, that is.
 

Ph33nix

New member
Jul 13, 2009
1,243
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
infinisynth said:
Internet Kraken said:
infinisynth said:
I think it's a great crime deterrent and I wish that it was implemented here in the U.S. That would be swell.
Oh look
bjj hero said:
I just wonder what sort of deterant this is if they have had to decapitate 40 people this year. Something isn't working.
This person already pointed out the flaw in this logic.
40 people a year!?! Lets compare that to the amount of rapes and murders and shit that happen in the U.S. every year. If we could slim down the crime rate 1% per year by using this method then it would be considered a success in many peoples eyes. What flaw are you talking about?
You're missing the point. The point is that this does not prevent crimes. There is no evidence to suggest that. We already have a death penalty in the US and we still have higher crimes.

Secondly, this is just one method of killing people in Saudi Arabia. I vet they have other, more common forms of capital punishment. You also seem to be forgetting that this man was put on trial without a lawyer. That's another reason not to use this form of justice.
in most states the death penalty is gone only Texas has been making it easier to kill these people
 

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Wow, if only they did that here... he should be granted a lawyer and should be granted a fair trial but if found guilty for a crime like that... well give me the Knife and I'll do it for you. The Crucifix is there to show people what will happen to them if they do this. You know I know I sound a little evil for agreeing that this should be done but understand that when thinking about the children he raped and left for dead.. I think of my niece... the rest is easy.

When thinking of people like these, think of your children or family members as the victims... what would you want doing to them if he had done that to your child?.
 

Sindaine

New member
Dec 29, 2008
438
0
0
Why are people so quick to assume he DIDN'T do it, is what I want to know? Did DNA cease to exist or something?

Also, no amount of money will make those childrens' trauma any less. Knowing their abuser is still alive, safe and sound, being fed and sheltered and biding his time until he gets out to come rape them again. If he'd dead, you see, he can't do that ever again, thus the victims can start working towards healing.
 

Gebi10000

New member
Aug 14, 2009
475
0
0
I've said it before, and will say it again:The death penalty is NEVER a answer.EVERY human being has done something wrong in it's life, and should be given a chance to redeem itself. I'm not saying they shouldn't go to prison ,I'm saying that if we kill a person, they will never have the chance to regret their deeds, however depraved ignorant these deeds were.NO PERSON should have the power to decided over the life or death of another.
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
whaleswiththumbs said:
I think we should do this here.. Pedophiles don't have rights anymore. Of course special exceptions to those who are wrongfully sentenced, but small price to pay for it, maybe you'll start checking age better.
This is probably his excuse...

http://img.moronail.net/img/0/1/901.jpg

More on topic, I agree. Pedophiles, especially those who kill their victims, deserve no rights.
 

Yegargeburble

New member
Nov 11, 2008
1,058
0
0
That seems a little like overkill, but who am I to pass judgement on anyone? Let them do what they want to the guy.
 

Maze1125

New member
Oct 14, 2008
1,679
0
0
Sindaine said:
Why are people so quick to assume he DIDN'T do it, is what I want to know? Did DNA cease to exist or something?
Oh yes, I'm sorry I forgot, in cases of child abuse, it's guilty until proven innocent, right? My mistake.
 

HyperCubed4

New member
Oct 2, 2009
20
0
0
The Great JT said:
Geez sods (Saudi Arabians), excessive?

Wait a minute, he raped five children!? That's too fucking nice! Behead him, crucify him and then let the throngs of fans throw rocks at his corpse!
Oh wow, I missed that. I thought he only raped the one. Well, I'd say crucify him first THEN decapitate him. He would die slowly and painfully, then they could cut off his head and display it to everyone as a symbol of justice. Well, their version of justice, anyway.

Maybe I'm being a bit too harsh on this guy, but he raped five children, so I guess those thoughts are justified in my eyes.
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
HyperCubed4 said:
The Great JT said:
Geez sods (Saudi Arabians), excessive?

Wait a minute, he raped five children!? That's too fucking nice! Behead him, crucify him and then let the throngs of fans throw rocks at his corpse!
Oh wow, I missed that. I thought he only raped the one. Well, I'd say crucify him first THEN decapitate him. He would die slowly and painfully, then they could cut off his head and display it to everyone as a symbol of justice. Well, their version of justice, anyway.

Maybe I'm being a bit too harsh on this guy, but he raped five children, so I guess those thoughts are justified in my eyes.
He also killed one of them.
 

Maze1125

New member
Oct 14, 2008
1,679
0
0
Akai Shizuku said:
More on topic, I agree. Pedophiles, especially those who kill their victims, deserve no rights.
Actually, the majority of child rapists aren't paedophiles. They're just bastards with a power complex who have a position of power over a child.

In fact, rape in general is usually about power, not sex.
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,425
0
0
HyperCubed4 said:
The Great JT said:
Geez sods (Saudi Arabians), excessive?

Wait a minute, he raped five children!? That's too fucking nice! Behead him, crucify him and then let the throngs of fans throw rocks at his corpse!
Oh wow, I missed that. I thought he only raped the one. Well, I'd say crucify him first THEN decapitate him. He would die slowly and painfully, then they could cut off his head and display it to everyone as a symbol of justice. Well, their version of justice, anyway.

Maybe I'm being a bit too harsh on this guy, but he raped five children, so I guess those thoughts are justified in my eyes.
so raping one kid is excusable? ill keep that in mind next time i touch your daughter in the ass.
 

Sindaine

New member
Dec 29, 2008
438
0
0
Maze1125 said:
Sindaine said:
Why are people so quick to assume he DIDN'T do it, is what I want to know? Did DNA cease to exist or something?
Oh yes, I'm sorry I forgot, in cases of child abuse, it's guilty until proven innocent, right? My mistake.
NOW you've got it!
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
Akai Shizuku said:
More on topic, I agree. Pedophiles, especially those who kill their victims, deserve no rights.
Take the rights away from one, you might as well take the rights away from everyone. Once you start including allowances and caveats into what is, and what is not, acceptable treatment for human beings then you wind up dehumanizing humans.

Guantanamo bay? Did you object? Well there were many people who thought that was justice. They were terrorists, going to kill and maim people who were just going about their business. So locking them up and torturing them all day long was actually humane.

To forestall your next point, there really isn't a difference. Leaving an improvised explosive device in a village where kids play, knowing that they could be killed, and raping those kids, are two things that are pretty much on par with each other as far as evil goes.
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
Gebi10000 said:
I've said it before, and will say it again:The death penalty is NEVER a answer.EVERY human being has done something wrong in it's life, and should be given a chance to redeem itself. I'm not saying they shouldn't go to prison ,I'm saying that if we kill a person, they will never have the chance to regret their deeds, however depraved ignorant these deeds were.NO PERSON should have the power to decided over the life or death of another.
The chance to regret his deeds isn't going to reverse the severe mental damage on his victims, and it sure as hell isn't going to bring back the innocent little girl he murdered. The death penalty won't do it either, but at least there's some retribution there.