Poll: - Parents Have Sex With Nine-Year-Old Son -

Recommended Videos

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
"I understand that you think we are wrong but we think the human body is art and to be admired ..."

Which is why we were using him for kiddie porn to put on the internet. In my opinion, these fucked up assholes were planning on using the kid this way the moment they conceived him. Hell, I'm certain that's the very reason why they had a kid to begin with. As far as I'm concerned, they were guilty from the very beginning, and they make real artists look like a bunch of nutjobs.
 

mechanixis

New member
Oct 16, 2009
1,136
0
0
Seriously? This is being put to a poll?

I had a screwed-up childhood just because my mother raised me Catholic.
 

Sougo

New member
Mar 20, 2010
634
0
0
Give the parents a life sentence in prison, or just execute them.
Confiscate all their assets/moneys/property and transfer it to the kids name, with the clause that he gains control of it when he turns 18. Send him to an orphanage till then.
 

GothmogII

Possessor Of Hats
Apr 6, 2008
2,215
0
0
bam13302 said:
As much as i am against this sort of thing, i must stand by my guns and say the government should stay out of child raising, this is something that needs to be handled by the community, not government. I would not be against the government educating parents, however they should not interfere.
...Wow, that really says a lot about my political views...
Handled by the community...why does that raise images of angry mobs and pitchforks in my head?
 

Nickolai77

New member
Apr 3, 2009
2,843
0
0
Incest and pedophilia really is, to most people, quite disgusting. But just because something is disgusting doesn't mean we should get all emotive about this and say the parents should be killed just because what they did was disgusting...scat's disgusting too, but you wouldn't kill someone for having a scat fetish.

What the parents did was morally wrong. It was morally wrong because:

1)Pre-pubecent children are unable to consent too nor understand what sex is and should therefore be kept out of it until they are old enough.

2)The act of incest is wrong because it can produce malformed children

3)Parents have a responsability to raise their children appropiatly. The parents decieved their child by treating incest and pedophilia as if it was a norm- and this could count as a form of exploitation. They decieved their child in order to fulfill their sexual needs.


Don't condem the parents because what they did was "disgusting"- as a hetrosexual male i personally find imagining the act of male homosexual sex rather disgusting, whereas a gay person wouldn't. What is disgusting to one person may not be to another. Therefore when judging cases like this we should ignore our emotive disgust response, and judge the case from a rational, neutral perspective.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Having sex with prepubescents is akin to forcing a newborn to bench 500 pounds.

Shouldn't be done, can't be done in a true sense, and will hurt someone very bad.

While I don't have an exclusive problem with other people performing incest (as long as children don't come from the act,) I do have a problem if one of the partners is fucking sexually immature. That's just fucking sick.

We could really avoid a lot of this shit if we required licenses for childbirth or some such.
 

Necromancer1991

New member
Apr 9, 2010
805
0
0
This is just wrong because:
1.He's 9, at least wait like 5 years!
2.It involves the parents....ugh how disturbing, walking in on your parents doing it and doing it WITH them are 2 totally different thing.
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
Nickolai77 said:
Incest and pedophilia really is, to most people, quite disgusting. But just because something is disgusting doesn't mean we should get all emotive about this and say the parents should be killed just because what they did was disgusting...scat's disgusting too, but you wouldn't kill someone for having a scat fetish.

What the parents did was morally wrong. It was morally wrong because:

1)Pre-pubecent children are unable to consent too nor understand what sex is and should therefore be kept out of it until they are old enough.

2)The act of incest is wrong because it can produce malformed children

3)Parents have a responsability to raise their children appropiatly. The parents decieved their child by treating incest and pedophilia as if it was a norm- and this could count as a form of exploitation. They decieved their child in order to fulfill their sexual needs.


Don't condem the parents because what they did was "disgusting"- as a hetrosexual male i personally find imagining the act of male homosexual sex rather disgusting, whereas a gay person wouldn't. What is disgusting to one person may not be to another. Therefore when judging cases like this we should ignore our emotive disgust response, and judge the case from a rational, neutral perspective.
I was under the distinct impression that people were saying it was "disgusting" BECAUSE it was morally wrong. I mean, sure, a boy having sex with his own parents who are practically a half century old conjures up unpleasant images, but that seems more like an after thought of the initial reaction in favor for the twisted morality of the issue.
 

DemonicVixen

New member
Oct 24, 2009
1,660
0
0
That was just sick. It took me a lot to try and read that article. How on earth can they say it was fair to do that regardless of whether the kid liked it or not or whether it "taught" him all there is to know?? He's far too young, and if he doesnt know it by the time he's 15-16 then bloody hell, at least let him find out for himself in the way many other teens do.
 

Spacelord

New member
May 7, 2008
1,811
0
0
In a way you could equate significantly deviant child rearing with child abuse: after all, when you're through raising your child you're sending it out into society. And society has its own rules which you have to obey in order to do well in life. The fact that the parents were found out after their 10 year old son propositioned a girl for sex - which violates implicit social contracts - says enough. Though you might be able to argue that it's a part of the child's natural development (not likely, but bear with me), it's important to make the distinction between what is natural and what's acceptable. While the early sexual activity with his parents may not be damaging to him (though I had to surpress a shudder just writing that) the culture shock that he'll inevitably go through will. When you decide to raise your child so far away from the dominant culture's norms you end up with an adolescent ill-prepared for life outside the microcosm he's accustomed to. And that's the exact antithesis of good parenting.
 

Arkhangelsk

New member
Mar 1, 2009
7,702
0
0
Well, as far as incest goes, I've always been okay with it, as long as A)There is no breeding of dysfunctional childs, and B)It's consensual by full judgement. Of course the child finds it okay, he's raised to think it's okay. And he's not old enough to have that kind of judgement. Imagine his sex/social life in the future. He be fucked up, man.

And I learned about sex without sex ed. Two things: Internet and the discovery of masturbation. Sure, I needed a little more info on the details, but I didn't need any rape.
 

mechanixis

New member
Oct 16, 2009
1,136
0
0
Davey Woo said:
FreelanceButler said:
Yes, yes, it's all very wrong, but why do people have to make threads about this?
I'm not insulting anyone, I'm actually asking. Is it just so we can have another round of everyone saying the same thing worded slightly differently?
It's called, news.
I think the term 'sensationalism' is more accurate. The verdict on whether or not this was okay was so forgone that there really isn't any discussion to be had.

He's got a point, these threads are pretty tiresome.
 

Toastergoat

New member
Jul 1, 2009
55
0
0
If they wanted to teach your kid about sex then how about talking to him, or if they are such an open minded family why didn't the family have sex in front of him rather than doing the kid, this makes me sick
 

Jaded Scribe

New member
Mar 29, 2010
711
0
0
WTF?

The nudist bit? That's fine. I don't do it myself, but I get it.

But the sex? Hell no. These people should rot in jail for the rest of their lives.
 

Perryman93

New member
Mar 27, 2009
281
0
0
I think people should be allowed to raise their children how they wish but not in ways as disgusting as using them for sex etc
 

mechanixis

New member
Oct 16, 2009
1,136
0
0
Danny Ocean said:
Relativism is all fine and dandy until they disagree with you, huh guys?
Oh don't be a hippy about this. Doing things that deviant to a child in his formative years by his parental figures is going to give him some deeply flawed notions about standards of social and intimate behavior and effectively destroy that kid's ability to function in society. This isn't about them being 'different', it's about them devastating their son's upbringing.