Poll: Pokemon's gotten way out of hand..yes?

Recommended Videos

MetaKnight19

New member
Jul 8, 2009
2,007
0
0
I agree with most people saying that there are too many Pokemon. In the Red and Blue era there were 151 if you include Mew, thats a decent number. The tally was raised in Gold and Silver to 252 if you include Celebi. Fair enough I suppose, but from Ruby/Sapphire onwards, the numbers are ridiculous. In the R/S/E games there was a total of 386. That is far too many, and now with D/P/Pt the number has increased to 493! But hell, I still find the games fun to play, so I dont really care. I go through the game catching the least amount of Pokemon I can, then go about getting ones I missed. Bear in mind these numbers include event Pokemon but even so, they have to stop after a while.
 

phoenix352

New member
Mar 29, 2009
605
0
0
they should have just made pokemon for the next gen ..

3rd person view in a full 3d world make it a sand box obviously .

when you start a fight it be seizure flashes like always then you see "the players" like chose a pokemon and you get full control over it so it becomes the player so fights would not just be decided upon who has the highest level pokemon with the best attacks....

youd have to use cover the landscape and all that crap.....
 

Kidbizzaro

New member
May 20, 2009
7
0
0
hypothetical fact said:
Kidbizzaro said:
"...And the HM moves! Dear God the HM moves...Surf, dive, waterfall, paddle, float, drown, so many fuckin' HM moves I had two separate Pokemon with nothing by HM moves and the other four to actually battle"

Hahaha thank you! Those things were such a waste of space! I remember in Silver version alone there were like 3 HM's that could only be used by water types...which pretty much made my Feraligatr suck ass.
Er. You know you can hit the quote button if you want to quote someone.
My bad. Still new to this.
 

Stalk3rchief

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,010
0
0
Pokemon got stupid after the Hoen [sp?] region.
Then they started making banana tree dinosaurs and monkeys with hands on their asses.
Just ridiculous.
*Shakes head in shame*
 

KarumaK

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,068
0
0
They should just make it an MMO and be done with it. They could make it console based on the Wii or something.

I'd pay for that shit.

http://www.pokemontrash.com/images/1184620195.png
 

Westy215

New member
Aug 31, 2009
25
0
0
Yes I remember the Red, Blue and Yellow games as the orginals and even though im still a 'young' gamer, I still think they have gone way too far. I remember when I could talk to any of my friends who have played pokemon and we could tell each other about ALL the pokemon and all about them. Now I only know the friggin legendaries! Pokemon needs to die off before we all remember it as only a worthless franchise and not as the god it should be remembered as.
 

megapenguinx

New member
Jan 8, 2009
3,865
0
0
I say no, and they are still just variations of animals in the real world. They main game has stayed the same since blue/red. Bad guys trying to take over the world, you stop them, you take on the elite four, you become champion. The games are just addictive as crack and they keep people coming back.
 

McBurks

New member
May 8, 2009
259
0
0
APPCRASH said:
I still enjoy the old Pokemon Red and Blue games. They should have stopped at 150.
Typical.

They should have stopped when they started to run out of ideas for Pokemon designs.Now they're trying to shove as much down our throats while they can,and pacify the old gamers who want remakes (HeartGold,SoulSilver.)

They have been getting lazy lately with some of these Pokemon and story lines,and they have ass explain to us how half these Pokemon have never been mentioned before. (You would think if Arceus created all Pokemon,he would have been mentioned SOONER.)
 

tsolless

New member
Jul 15, 2009
243
0
0
You played pokemon as a kid and thought that they were awesome.

Going back you can see that pokemon is ridiculous and uncreative, but due to nostalgia you only realize it in the newer pokemon.

Pokemon was always ridiculous your nostalgia is merely denying you from realizing this.
 

NintenTim64

New member
May 22, 2009
82
0
0
I was rather skeptic about the newest generation of pokemon, but after playing Pearl I felt that the series has still got some sparkle to it, especially for the more hardcore fans who really search out everything there is. The post-story modes are getting more and more creative even if the pokemon aren't.
Of course, the original 151 (and especially Bulbasaur) will always hold a special place in my heart, and the newer games have their faults, but Pokemon is still managing to take me (at least) on an interesting journey, even if it is pretty well the same as the last one, with enough new stuff to keep me interested.
 

axia777

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,895
0
0
Yes, but it will never stop, Ash will never grow up and that fucking little yellow rat will never evolve.
 

Rouzeki

New member
Feb 11, 2009
77
0
0
Personally I don't really see a problem with it. the wider the number of Pokemon gets, the more possible it becomes to tailor special teams as they release more Pokemon for the under represented types.

when it comes to the way Pokemon look... each version has had several misses. 3rd generations luvdisc got on my nerves for truly being bland, but then the unknown are just entirely pointless overall. some good, and some crud each generation.

Sometimes though the newer versions seem worth a look to me. I'm picking up platinum because among other things, they finally divided up the mechanics behind each element, and gave physical and mental attacks for all 17 types. this means Pokemon who couldn't use their own element well (nearly ALL dark and ghost Pokemon in 3rd gen due to stat dispersion, or even just physical types with originally special elements) get a second chance to shine a bit.

sure, they may be the same stamping out overall, but they do add or alter the mechanics a bit, or add something new overall like the 3rd and 4th generation Pokemon contests, so there are more things to do. personally my issue is your always locked into the gym battle thing. maybe I want to travel the whole revealed world to raise my snorlax to win cute competitions in every corner of the known Pokemon world. In my case, sticking a medal on my "little" (as little as roughly 1000 pounds) snorky is a lot more fun then another gym brawl.

As for each new one dropping so many Pokemon, I can only assume that each area is relatively in the dark about each other unless you actually go, which doesn't make much sense. maybe you won't hear the story of every region, but they all seem relatively self-contained. that could have something to do with it, but each region not being aware of the basic other one is kinda foolish, but they gotta ship sequels out somehow. still more diverse then other franchises, id say.
 

PureChaos

New member
Aug 16, 2008
4,990
0
0
i've always said that the first generation was great, second was OK but after that was too much. there are, what, just under 500 of them and i heard a new generation is being planned. STOP IT ALREADY
 

messy

New member
Dec 3, 2008
2,057
0
0
NeoAC said:
Actual number of Pokemon is 486, and yeah, that's too much. I don't even know what they are going to do for legendaries now in their next game.
Good piont with ledgendaries, where can you really go after controller time, space and assume the ghost dragons meant to be chaos or something. Oh and you capture essentially pokemon divinity (or you will do at one of the event things)

OT; I quite like pearl and diamond. I've played all the other generations as well and like them. Although must of the new ones are completely pointless. You can complete the main story with pretty much anything and if you try for competetative battle (which I did, notice the word try) you'll spend ages making a squad but very few of the new ones are any good.
 

ikyda1

New member
May 22, 2009
74
0
0
i normally use to deny that the 2nd and 3rd gen pokemon existed but with 4th gen pokemon i though they just got better and more interesting

plus diamond/peral was probably the best pokemon game since pokemon red/blue
 

lostclause

New member
Mar 31, 2009
1,860
0
0
I do agree that Ruby should have been the last (although fire red and leaf green were welcome). They are scrapping the barrel for new pokemon and it's becoming a bit ridiculous. I mean, they've lost all style.
Doesn't even compare to the classics and some of the good additions.
 

Melon Hunter

Chief Procrastinator
May 18, 2009
914
0
0
Pokemon out of hand? In some ways, yes. I agree that the Pokemon have been more and more unoriginal as time goes on, and with each generation, escalating amounts of Legendary Pokemon have been piled into the games, but the post-story development is much improved, and I found even Platinum Version to have enough inovation to be likeable.

What annoys me about the franchise is the amount of legendary Pokemon. Or more specifically, the special ones like Darkrai and Shaymin, that you can only get from a few select events in Japan or maybe North America, if you're lucky, that run for a couple of days and then vanish, along with any chance of legitimately getting the Pokemon. I hate that.