As long as you get Warhawk and Infamous (or Killzone if you're more into the military style FPS) it's worth it.
My PSN account name is: TreblaineMazty said:snip
*Gasp* Horror, it must be an XBOT! What do you say Mazty? There is *NOOO* way he can have genuine criticism of MGS4 or Killzone 2 unless he is secretly in the pay of MICROSOFT!pieeater911 said:I can't recommend MGS4 because I think it is ridiculously boring and far overrated, and I also cannot recommend Killzone 2. The controls are just so shoddy that they seriously break the game. If the developers would release a patch or something to fix the controls then I'd probably tell you to think about getting it, but as of now don't even consider it.
Engine power is not measured by how much detail is represented in game, whatever you try and argue the Unreal Engine is certainly one of the best engines on the market - of that there is no question, it is by no means "weak", have you ever even used it?. The fact your arguing about consoles and engines is absoultly pathetic, especialy when the vast majority of what both of you have written is either pure bullshit or fanboy drivel, particularly you Mazty.Mazty said:Still shiny textures, but very, very flat models, showing a weak engine.
Are you serious?Zand88 said:You have;
Little Big Planet, which is OK.
Metal Gear Solid, which is overrated.
and Flower.
I'd say no. But I have all three consoles, so I don't care. Wii has no good games (decided to keep to play older games on GC and 64), PS3 has literally only one or two, and 360 and PC have all the fun titles. But if you like convoluted RPGs and anime, PS3 might be for you.
Simple, first I read your stupid argument and then I realized you were both fanboys and both wrong.Mazty said:How have you come to this conclusion?
So let me get this straight, your using the Unreal ENGINE as an example of the XBOX 360...? How exactly does that work, I agree the PS3 is a powerful machine, more so than the 360 when utilized correctly but engines have nothing to do with it.However, MGS4 has a higher polycount, as well as good lighting etc, showing that it is able to render more at an adequate speed e.g. 60 FPS, than the 360.
It would take to long, and I've seen your fanboy rants before, I'd rather not have to sit through all that again...but see above for a small example.Great how you explained how what I said was "bullshit"...
Oh wait, you didn't.
How is the MGS4 engine PS3 exclusive, chances are it'll be used on the upcoming MGS game that will also feature on the Xbox 360. Engines aren't exclusive to consoles and ultimately engines don't mean all that much - rather the artistic design. Is Gears of War 2 technically better than Uncharted, yes. Does it look as good? In most places no. Is that down to the engine - no.And considering the point of the thread is "Are PS3 exclusives worth it" I think talking about exclusive PS3 game engines are relevant. Nice to see you name calling before you stop, take a breath, and actually read the topic of the thread....
Way to be a hypocrite...and their sheer lack of analytical skills, thinking that name calling and subjective arguments mean anything.
When did I ever say it wasn't? Here we go again - you and your pathetic fanboy mindset...Fact is, the PS3 is a better console, technically, than the 360.
Well I'll just name those from the games I own (not counting those on your list, even though I do have them as well:Gondito said:...if im missing any other major 360 exclusives, I would love to hear!
Just PM that username and I will reply. I'll even PM you if you are too shy. I will even friend you if necessary so you can view my trophies I earned in Killzone 2. And yeah, I have a crappy camera-phone which doesn't like to sync with my computer, so what.Mazty said:So, I guess I was right in the fact that you don't own a PS3
Actually I do "give a shit". I'm a fan of RPG's too, and I can see many of the games on your list are rpgs, If you wanted to flame someone for not including the popular rpgs on the 360's list, you should have quoted the user I quoted, hes the one that ragged on "convoluted rpg's"D_987 said:Well I'll just name those from the games I own (not counting those on your list, even though I do have them as well:Gondito said:...if im missing any other major 360 exclusives, I would love to hear!
. Lost Odyssey
. Blue Dragon
. The Last Remnant (PS3 version was cancelled due to engine issues)
. Tales of Vesperia (US and Europe)
. Star Ocean : The Last Hope
. Infinite Undiscovery
. Mass Effect
. Too Human
. Left 4 Dead
. Shadow Complex
and from those I've pre-ordered;
. Mass Effect 2
. Splinter Cell : Conviction
. Magna Carta 2
. Left 4 Dead 2 (I think)
(You missed FF13vs., Grand Turismo and The Last Guardian on your PS3 list BTW)
- Now I know for a minute you honestly don't give a shit what I have written because your being a fanboy. No doubt you'll try and claim these games are not "major". Well here's the thing:
Games are subjective. I personally am an RPG fan, and so this kind of line-up will appeal to me personally. I'm not a huge action game fan, nor a driving game fan, so many of the games on your list won't appeal to me. And before you go on about some of these games (well, two of them) being available on the PC - how can you compare PC games and console games - your either looking at lists of exclusive console games or your not - as long as it on one particular console and not on the other two its an exclusive in my eyes.
Which is exactly why this kind of discussion cannot revolve around pointless lists of games. Don't turn it into something like that...
You've shown this to be true? You've taken two screenshots and claimed that they alone represent the entire engine and used words such as "good" to describe lighting effects. Besides which the term "main exclusive" is completely inaccurate both from a subjective point of view and a sales point of view in that it's not the most played game on the Xbox, and its not the best selling game on the Xbox. I assume you already know that game is Halo 3.Mazty said:3)The UT engine is the engine behind the main 360 exclusive Gears of War 2. Considering Treblaine was going on about it being superior to the MGS4 engine, I was showing how this is not true. The UT engine is graphically weak when compared to other console engines on the market. I have shown this to be true, so I can't see what you are trying to get at...
As I stated previously the Unreal Engine is on the PS3 - its not exclusive at all - your comparing an exclusive engine possibly build specifically for one game or system - as you stated it has not yet been announced it will be used on Raiden. (I have no idea what engine MGS4 runs on nor do I care). Unfortunately you haven't actually produced any sources bar two pictures that you yourself analysed...5)Until the MGS game on the 360 is released, saying the MGS4 engine isn't exclusive is nothing but unsubstantiated speculation. Nice to see you are grasping the value of facts and sources in producing a constructive counter-argument...
Your right that was a stupid way of putting what I was trying to say, but not for the reasons you come out with. What I was attempting to say was that art direction has a far greater role in graphics than the engine itself. You can have all the great lighting you want but without great art direction your game won't look visually appealing. Yes that was a poor point to make, and you are correct on this point.6)You have always 'defended' the 360 since I've seen you on the Escapist. That's fine & fair enough, but not when you start name calling and coming out with garbage such as "The game engine doesn't have anything to do with the graphics".
Really, your using facts...? I don't think so.using facts to back my argument
You pretty much sum up my thoughts of yourself. I stated earlier the reason I didn't go into detail was because I've seen how you argue: you spend the vast majority of your argument insulting the other person / bullshitting and then attempt to take the high ground by claiming you don't. Its pathetic. I'm not going to bother replying any further because this whole thing is a waste of time - we both have opposite view-points. Unlike the "mature" (you seriously claim your mature...) person who would just keep bullshitting they're way through another pointless post whilst claiming their opinion is fact...you're just another fanboy with a ignorant, juvenile argument.
I just PM'd you via PSN, I recommend you watch your inbox for a message and friend invite from a certain fellow called Treblaine. That's me by the way. But what was that thing you were saying, with such certainty, that there is absolutely no chance I have a PS3?Mazty said:See, told you a knife rampage was possible on the easiest setting.
So, no pics of your PS3, or details of your monitor or parents HDTV.
Right, so basically, all I have to go on is your word that you have played these games in HD, when you've made some gross errors in commenting on said games e.g. WipeoutHD has AA problems.
Can you see why I'm highly skeptical?
And if you can remember, I actually gave you a link to a £175 monitor which is great for playing PS3 games on. Hardly £2000.
Bullshit about contrast ratio? No...if you want the best out of a PS3, obviously using a crappy monitor won't help...
I'm not gloating about being richer, most likely I'm not as I'm a student. But the fact remains that part of the PS3's appeal is a bluray player, and that's not going to be very useful for the unemployed/those in education. Though, I'm somewhat amused I managed to guess your age/level of education from the way you type. =p
Ok, but when you make a post comparing lists of "major exclusives" and then give one side a significant advantage it makes you appear to be of a fanboy don't you think?Gondito said:Actually I do "give a shit". I'm a fan of RPG's too, and I can see many of the games on your list are rpgs, If you wanted to flame someone for not including the popular rpgs on the 360's list, you should have quoted the user I quoted, hes the one that ragged on "convoluted rpg's"