He only knows two people who are atheists. There could very well be many more who kept their mouths shut (and who can blame them since the ONE person who did speak up is now skipping town due to the backlash).Twilight_guy said:I'm not saying that majority makes it right for them to do that, I'm saying that majority makes it impracticable to stop having the pray. He said that he knows of three atheist people in town (or was it his class?). If he is in such a small minority the better option is to, instead of changing the ceremony, simply let him leave and return after the prayer. It takes two second to set him up in location where he can simply slip out when he's uncomfortable and come back in, noone gets sued and the whole mess is solved. Instead we have to have a big debate about it and have incendiary arguments over the whole thing. (I looked through some of those comments on that web page and my god its like rednecks praising religion but in reverse). There is no reason to make a big mess out of this when the administrations could have easily fixed the situation.
He shouldn't have to leave because a PUBLIC school is ILLEGALLY incorporating religion (separation of church and state, the latter which funds the public schools). If they want to introduce prayer, they better be prepared to say "bye-bye" to their public funding. The majority opinion is irrelevant if they oppress or harm small groups (tyranny of the majority). It's why the gay marriage ban in California was overturned.