i think its perfectly fine as long as you use protection and understand the actualy biological purpose of sex (reproduction)
And cause even more overpopultion.Spinozaad said:I'm not promiscuous, although part of the reason for that is because I'm in a reasonably stable relationship.
I do not judge people for sleeping around. To paraphrase/rape a famous quotation: 'Fucking, for lack of a better word, is good.'
If I were single, and able to pick up and bed many different lovely ladies, I'd do it. Friends who cheat on their girlfriends/boyfriends, too. I might go 'Meh. Wouldn't have done that myself', but I'm not going to sit on a ridiculous high horse and judge them lacking in the ethical department.
If anything, I'd say that people should fuck around more. It might release some frustration/tension with the world.
You'd likely get an STD out of it.Betancore said:You literally stole my post.Oh That Dude said:I don't have a problem with it and struggle to see why anyone would have a problem with two consenting adults doing whatever the fuck they want.This is what I had typed up before I refreshed the page to see if there were any new replies -
It's not my problem. If two adults consent to having sex with one another, then they can bloody well do so. And for me personally, I don't consider sex a sacred act or anything, but I don't think I'd get anything out of sleeping with a lot of people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CondomIronman126 said:You'd likely get an STD out of it.Betancore said:You literally stole my post.Oh That Dude said:I don't have a problem with it and struggle to see why anyone would have a problem with two consenting adults doing whatever the fuck they want.This is what I had typed up before I refreshed the page to see if there were any new replies -
It's not my problem. If two adults consent to having sex with one another, then they can bloody well do so. And for me personally, I don't consider sex a sacred act or anything, but I don't think I'd get anything out of sleeping with a lot of people.
I grew up in the Bush era, but I don't care if people sleep around or not...ShadowsofHope said:Clinton was very much a more "liberal", promiscuous president, whereas Bush was far more Neo-Conservative Christian with the "only for marriage" belief. Leadership tends to influence populations, no less.vociferocity said:what does that even mean? non-american here, genuinely interested.xDarc said:Reading through the thread, the difference between kids who grew up during the clinton years and the ones who grew up during the bush ones is pretty evident.
I grew up constantly hearing about Clinton and his "latest hijinks", but I still think that sex is meant for a married couple only.ShadowsofHope said:Clinton was very much a more "liberal", promiscuous president, whereas Bush was far more Neo-Conservative Christian with the "only for marriage" belief. Leadership tends to influence populations, no less.vociferocity said:what does that even mean? non-american here, genuinely interested.xDarc said:Reading through the thread, the difference between kids who grew up during the clinton years and the ones who grew up during the bush ones is pretty evident.
Condoms work, too.lacktheknack said:How to get rid of AIDS: Don't have one night stands or casual sex for a generation.
Nicely sums up my feelings towards promiscuity.
Apparently not, as AIDS is <link=http://www.avert.org/usa-statistics.htm>AIDS is still extremely prevalent in the United StatesDags90 said:Condoms work, too.lacktheknack said:How to get rid of AIDS: Don't have one night stands or casual sex for a generation.
Nicely sums up my feelings towards promiscuity.
That's why you go 'Double'. Pill and condom.archvile93 said:And cause even more overpopultion.