There is no "low" to which I wouldn't sink in the defence of freedom.SinisterGehe said:Define freedom of speech.BlindTom said:Freedom of Speech
/thread
pardon me here.
"you are a fucking dumpfuck asshole retartd" = "You are stupid"
According to Wittgenstein, only one of these sentences, are sentences with "sense" in them (Sorry I don't know how to translate it better, I hope you get the idea). But still according to freedom of speech I have right I can say both.
Law is not moral. (we can all agree on)
- I have right to freedom of speech and expression.
-- But if I insult someone in public I can be fined or dragged in to court.
With both things giving out the same meaning but only one of them can be seen as having "sense" in them.
So what is freedom of speech?
"you must take what you give to others"
You really want to go in to that extreme low?
Don't forget that old guy's birthday we attendedFinalGamer said:4chan are a huge collective of millions of people. It is impossible to judge all of them based on what a group of them decide to do. Just as there's been several bad things they've done such as this DDoS attack, they've also done good-hearted things like the prevention of the Pflugerville pipe-bomb explosion, the arrest of the Canadian paedophile Chris Forcand, the arrest of several animal abusers, and the mixed but well-intentioned Scientology protests.
But they are neither good or bad. They just are. And you cannot judge all of them for one thing they do.
I love you. That is all.Player 2 said:LordWalter said:SEVEN? God damn.....we'll have to buy a dog.Kittenmauler said:Those guys are too savvy to be "hunted down." Most of them are behind seven proxies.![]()
You missed my point there.BlindTom said:There is no "low" to which I wouldn't sink in the defence of freedom.SinisterGehe said:Define freedom of speech.BlindTom said:Freedom of Speech
/thread
pardon me here.
"you are a fucking dumpfuck asshole retartd" = "You are stupid"
According to Wittgenstein, only one of these sentences, are sentences with "sense" in them (Sorry I don't know how to translate it better, I hope you get the idea). But still according to freedom of speech I have right I can say both.
Law is not moral. (we can all agree on)
- I have right to freedom of speech and expression.
-- But if I insult someone in public I can be fined or dragged in to court.
With both things giving out the same meaning but only one of them can be seen as having "sense" in them.
So what is freedom of speech?
"you must take what you give to others"
You really want to go in to that extreme low?
I completely agree!The_Deviant said:anon IS normal people.
Kittenmauler said:Those guys are too savvy to be "hunted down." Most of them are behind seven proxies.
SinisterGehe said:You missed my point there.BlindTom said:There is no "low" to which I wouldn't sink in the defence of freedom.SinisterGehe said:Define freedom of speech.BlindTom said:Freedom of Speech
/thread
pardon me here.
"you are a fucking dumpfuck asshole retartd" = "You are stupid"
According to Wittgenstein, only one of these sentences, are sentences with "sense" in them (Sorry I don't know how to translate it better, I hope you get the idea). But still according to freedom of speech I have right I can say both.
Law is not moral. (we can all agree on)
- I have right to freedom of speech and expression.
-- But if I insult someone in public I can be fined or dragged in to court.
With both things giving out the same meaning but only one of them can be seen as having "sense" in them.
So what is freedom of speech?
"you must take what you give to others"
You really want to go in to that extreme low?
Communication in form of speaking is way of getting a simple and primitive message trough with different sounds, (Different languages got different sounds and different construction of sounds for specific "word")
So when I say your are "you are a fucking dumpfuck asshole retartd" All I try to say you are "you are stupid". Same message can be given out in simple words of saying "You are stupid".
But be realistic, would you honestly be ready to let me criticise all of your believes, values, morals, comment on your, personal appearance, family, friends, hobbies job. And you are not allowed to anything to me because it is my right to say them in name of freedom of speech? You honestly think this can drive humanity forward? [u/]
*- I have right to freedom of speech and expression.
-- But if I insult someone in public I can be fined or dragged in to court.*
(From my earlier statment)*
"Freedom makes a huge requirement of every human being. With freedom comes responsibility."
-Eleanor Roosevelt
They already have Oprah living in fear of 9000 penises!!!Xero Scythe said:Kittenmauler said:Those guys are too savvy to be "hunted down." Most of them are behind seven proxies.
Mate, while the US government can be one of the most inefficient things on the planet, second only to Jack Thompson at times, when we get serious, we are single minded. If Obama thought that takin' down 4chan would help his polls, I don't think there's a force on earth that would stop the sheer weight of the FBI, CIA, and whatever combination of letters the government cares to put together would bring down on 4chan.
Bwahahahaha fucking brilliant! xDSanqlol said:I don't know why all is hating 4chan...
It was Ebaumsworld that did it anyway...
at no time did I say an actual bomb. terrorism is bad, do not blow stuff up unless you are the military or the police and you have the proper warrants and paperwork. murder is a crime and I will look down on you after you have been sent too jail.