Poll: Should Fallout: New Vegas have Multiplayer?
- Thread starter damn12369
- Start date
Recommended Videos
If it's anything like the Old Fallout, no,
If it's anything like the New Fallout, no,
If it isn't like those two, then it won't feel very falloutey.
If it's anything like the New Fallout, no,
If it isn't like those two, then it won't feel very falloutey.
No,the fallout games are ment to be single player experinces.
Althogh i do see how you could have "versus" multiplayer,all you have to do is take out vats and there you go.Some other things would have to be tweaked though to make it good.
I think co-op should be there though.
Althogh i do see how you could have "versus" multiplayer,all you have to do is take out vats and there you go.Some other things would have to be tweaked though to make it good.
I think co-op should be there though.
yup that's one of themNaumWolf said:The only real problem with that would be when you get stuck in VATS because some one triggered it and your on the other end of the map where the most threatening thing near you is a mean looking shrubTrifer420 said:
(vicinity? but, I don't want to protect this idea any longer, Fallout would be a terrible multiplayer.)I would see how it would work if they made a multiplayer after the last two games, turn-based and all, but I'm going to shut up now.
It would be immensely difficult to pull off a lot of the little things in Fallout. For one, in Fallout 3, at least, you had to choose what you carried carefully because of the weight limits. If multiple persons could be considered, a LOT more could be carried by specialization.
e.g. One would be an ammo carrier, another armor, another weapons, another as a miscellaneous, etc.
Also, several parts of the game would not be intimidating at all if there was more than one person, such as a fight against one or more Deathclaws. A Deathclaw can be intimidating if it's just one person. With multiple, one or two could have a Dartgun, and the others just light it up with conventional weapons. It wouldn't be difficult anymore. Or, one could go as far to say that a Dartgun would be obsolete, and with enough combined firepower, it wouldn't matter.
What I'm trying to say is: A lot of the game's charm would be lost with more than one player at a time.
e.g. One would be an ammo carrier, another armor, another weapons, another as a miscellaneous, etc.
Also, several parts of the game would not be intimidating at all if there was more than one person, such as a fight against one or more Deathclaws. A Deathclaw can be intimidating if it's just one person. With multiple, one or two could have a Dartgun, and the others just light it up with conventional weapons. It wouldn't be difficult anymore. Or, one could go as far to say that a Dartgun would be obsolete, and with enough combined firepower, it wouldn't matter.
What I'm trying to say is: A lot of the game's charm would be lost with more than one player at a time.
Not to put you down or anything, but the trouble with that statement is that could be said of just about anything. If you could make a Madonna video game "work," it would be good. But we have to ask ourselves: Do we have the patience?Fantastico said:
i still think a horde style MP would work wellTrifer420 said:yup that's one of themNaumWolf said:The only real problem with that would be when you get stuck in VATS because some one triggered it and your on the other end of the map where the most threatening thing near you is a mean looking shrubTrifer420 said:
I would see how it would work if they made a multiplayer after the last two games, turn-based and all, but I'm going to shut up now.
It should have co-op only don"t call me a nerd but good role playing. and plus co-op would make it perfect for machinima. and just take vats out for Co-op less problms that way and its more realistic.
It wouldn't work very well. I say they skip multiplayer completely and expand the single player further.Although co-op could work well.
