alcohol is a great, if not the greatest of darwinian tools, everyone should be allowed to drink it.
I think you fail to see the point that those arguing for the lowering of the drinking age are trying to make. By making alcohol legal at a lower age and providing proper education you create a culture of responsibility, rather than saying "no, you can't have this", while holding a beer in one hand and mainlining PCP with the other.skcseth said:Kids are just too irresponsible (for the most part) when it comes to alcohol.
That's not to say some adults (21+) are any more responsible, but you have to draw a line somewhere.
The problem with polls is that there is no way to tell if those answering it were telling the truth. There is also the fact that it does not say how many people were in each age group and that can also skew the results. Top that off with the fact that 10 different specialists can take the same data set and come to completely different conclusions and make pretty graphs for each and I'd be inclined to call this bunk.gentleben said:I found this data on US drink driving as well through a Gallup Organisation poll.
![]()
![]()
I would also raise the point that several US states have a ludicrously high BAC at 0.08%.
But even with proper education, kids will still be irresponsible. They'll all just have easier access to alcohol to fuel their nights of binge drinking.gentleben said:I think you fail to see the point that those arguing for the lowering of the drinking age are trying to make. By making alcohol legal at a lower age and providing proper education you create a culture of responsibility, rather than saying "no, you can't have this", while holding a beer in one hand and mainlining PCP with the other.skcseth said:Kids are just too irresponsible (for the most part) when it comes to alcohol.
That's not to say some adults (21+) are any more responsible, but you have to draw a line somewhere.
And also, there's a group called Mothers Against Drink Driving? What an exercise in fucking redundancy.
Cleansing the gene pool man.mr rofl said:too many stupid people.... The age should, in reverse, be higher
Are you saying that the people of America are that incapable of rational thought and basic responsibility that they can't handle something that is accepted in every other developed nation on earth?skcseth said:But even with proper education, kids will still be irresponsible. They'll all just have easier access to alcohol to fuel their nights of binge drinking.gentleben said:I think you fail to see the point that those arguing for the lowering of the drinking age are trying to make. By making alcohol legal at a lower age and providing proper education you create a culture of responsibility, rather than saying "no, you can't have this", while holding a beer in one hand and mainlining PCP with the other.skcseth said:Kids are just too irresponsible (for the most part) when it comes to alcohol.
That's not to say some adults (21+) are any more responsible, but you have to draw a line somewhere.
And also, there's a group called Mothers Against Drink Driving? What an exercise in fucking redundancy.
Look at sex education in schools. It still seems to be a taboo subject (at least during the time I was in school). It's just a course consisting of a few "shock" videos with a lecture and a few free condoms and they just kick you out the door, assuming you know everything (sad, I know). I think schools would run an alcohol education course the exact same way. Even if the classes were properly taught, it would more than likely go in one ear and out the other with these kids.
I work in a club here and all I hear every night from adults, and kids posing as adults with fake I.D.'s, is how much they are all looking forward to, and I quote, "getting wasted". These kids want to get so drunk, that they can't even stand up or formulate even a quarter of a sentence.
I can see the point those who are for lowering the drinking age are trying to make, but it will fail in the long run. If you do raise the drinking age however, make sure schools aren't just using the alcohol education classes as a filler for homerooms, and raise taxes for those who are buying who are under 21, to limit the amount they can have. Or at least try to anyway.
Yep. I wouldn't put it that harshly, but yep. People everywhere, even in these developed nations, tend to do things in excess. For Americans (mostly; and I'm sure this goes for the English/Canadians/who ever else), it just happens to be alcohol.gentleben said:Are you saying that the people of America are that incapable of rational thought and basic responsibility that they can't handle something that is accepted in every other developed nation on earth?
1) yes, and I am an American. The problem isn't that most people won't respond well to education and act responsible, it's that everything here has to be broken down to the lowest common denominator. Our lawmakers are of the opinion that if it won't work for everyone then it won't work at all. See also: no child left behind. We have to dumb everything down so the dumb people are not left out.gentleben said:Are you saying that the people of America are that incapable of rational thought and basic responsibility that they can't handle something that is accepted in every other developed nation on earth?
And I don't know about sex education, but we started in grade 6 at my primary school, and did like 4 classes in a year, then another 4 in grade 7, then similar numbers in grades 8, 9 and 10 at high school.
I look forward to living in a China-led world in the next 15 years then.khain13 said:1) yes, and I am an American. The problem isn't that most people won't respond well to education and act responsible, it's that everything here has to be broken down to the lowest common denominator. Our lawmakers are of the opinion that if it won't work for everyone then it won't work at all. See also: no child left behind. We have to dumb everything down so the dumb people are not left out.gentleben said:Are you saying that the people of America are that incapable of rational thought and basic responsibility that they can't handle something that is accepted in every other developed nation on earth?
And I don't know about sex education, but we started in grade 6 at my primary school, and did like 4 classes in a year, then another 4 in grade 7, then similar numbers in grades 8, 9 and 10 at high school.
2) The same applies to sex ed. We had a 2 week class in 5th and 6th grade and a chapter in "Health" class went over sex ed in 9th grade. That was about it. Not only that, it pushed abstinence and barely touched on safe sex practices. Come to think of it that's pretty much how the DARE program works too. "Kids, don't do drugs, mmmmkay?"