Because of the temperance movement and MADD.rees263 said:From an outsiders perspective it seems that the US has a great deal of taboo over drinking for some completely random reason (see prohibition)- while most of europe has a pretty strong tradition of drinking. A lot of European countries have no drinking age at all, or only some arbitrarily low one, and even then the rest usually allow beer or wine for 16 year olds (even uptight Britain in some circumstances).
I think the real question though is why are people who aren't considered responsible enough to drink still considered responsible enough to vote?
The obvious answer is to raise the voting age (and driving and everything else) to 21!
I blacked out after the first line of this ridiculous hyperbole laden post. Seriously, do you actually believe half the stuff you just posted or were you lying out your arse?LimaBravo said:While your correct that the majority seem to enjoy alcohol, the majority also beleive dinosaurs were an elaborte farce by an omnipotent force that never does anything tangible and created the universe. They also beleive the average gamer is 16 and that violent videogames lead to violent actions but TV/cinema is OK. Most of them dont know who Hitler was and beleive King Arthur was real.
The majorities opinion might not be the best rule of thumb to take into account, especially since the majority would like to hold onto alcohol as a crutch for their depressing dreary empty lives.
I see your point but honestly 99% of people cant hold their drink and shouldnt be allowed to drink. If youve ever said the words 'I blacked out' , 'Where am I' or 'Who are you & where are my pants' you should be barred for life (mebbe a three strikes and your barred rule thats fairer)
Yeah, but if it was legal, you could call a cab, or some relative to pick you up without fear of punishment.sneakypenguin said:As much as I would love to say no, my libertarian side says yes. Provided that said teenager doesn't harm anyone else I have no problem with drinking. It's when you get smashed at a friends and drive home, wreck, and kill three people that I have issue with. I'm of the position that causing deaths while drunk should be considered murder.
You can do that anyways, I don't think a cabbie is going to take you home and have the cops waiting for you, same with relatives.Wardog13 said:Yeah, but if it was legal, you could call a cab, or some relative to pick you up without fear of punishment.sneakypenguin said:As much as I would love to say no, my libertarian side says yes. Provided that said teenager doesn't harm anyone else I have no problem with drinking. It's when you get smashed at a friends and drive home, wreck, and kill three people that I have issue with. I'm of the position that causing deaths while drunk should be considered murder.
Will do sport, but you reporting me doesn't change the fact that your post didn't have any semblance of a rational thought in it, any factual basis for any of its allegations, or any evidentiary support.LimaBravo said:I was going for troll, but it looks like youve taken that position. Enjoy your report.gentleben said:I blacked out after the first line of this ridiculous hyperbole laden post. Seriously, do you actually believe half the stuff you just posted or were you lying out your arse?LimaBravo said:While your correct that the majority seem to enjoy alcohol, the majority also beleive dinosaurs were an elaborte farce by an omnipotent force that never does anything tangible and created the universe. They also beleive the average gamer is 16 and that violent videogames lead to violent actions but TV/cinema is OK. Most of them dont know who Hitler was and beleive King Arthur was real.
The majorities opinion might not be the best rule of thumb to take into account, especially since the majority would like to hold onto alcohol as a crutch for their depressing dreary empty lives.
I see your point but honestly 99% of people cant hold their drink and shouldnt be allowed to drink. If youve ever said the words 'I blacked out' , 'Where am I' or 'Who are you & where are my pants' you should be barred for life (mebbe a three strikes and your barred rule thats fairer)
What's it going to be? Dumbass, or liar?
agreedDannyBoy451 said:As if having a drinking age has ever stopped anyone from drinking.
Well I know your relatives wont call the cops but they will be royaly pissed, but they might be anyway even if it was legal.sneakypenguin said:You can do that anyways, I don't think a cabbie is going to take you home and have the cops waiting for you, same with relatives.Wardog13 said:Yeah, but if it was legal, you could call a cab, or some relative to pick you up without fear of punishment.sneakypenguin said:As much as I would love to say no, my libertarian side says yes. Provided that said teenager doesn't harm anyone else I have no problem with drinking. It's when you get smashed at a friends and drive home, wreck, and kill three people that I have issue with. I'm of the position that causing deaths while drunk should be considered murder.
This. I know there are a lot of responsible teens but for every responsible teen, there's four idiots.mr rofl said:too many stupid people.... The age should, in reverse, be higher