Poll: should you need a license to be a parent

Recommended Videos

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
Knight Templar said:
Samurai Goomba said:
Douk said:
Glefistus said:
If the parents want to pay for a little extra "oomph" in their child(higher intellect/dexterity, w/e) that's fine too.
No way will I let that happen. I will assassinate the scientist responsible. Once scientists find out a way to remove birth defects before they're born, the world will collapse.

It'll start with 'my sons gonna be born with a funny nose FIX IT!' to 'my sons not smart enough, or strong enough, or dark enough or have good hair' and parents will start to reject their 'mistakes' and people will kill each other over this.

I dreamed it all up one night trust me it will happen.
"Brave Newer World" is a short story which pretty much describes that which you were talking about.
And it is the logical continuation of a license to breed.
Can't disagree with that.
 

Knight Templar

Moved on
Dec 29, 2007
3,848
0
0
Supreme Unleaded said:
Knight Templar said:
Mrsnugglesworth said:
stone0042 said:
It would be pointless, what would you do to those that fail? You can hardly steal their baby...
Every 3 years you have to take the test from 18 to Death.


If you fail to take the test, and you have a child you get fined.
What happens when the fine isn't paid?
Is the child then taken away? That would create ever biger issues than poor parenting.
Why don't you look at China's 2 (or is it one i can't remeber) child policy, if you have 3 kids you get an extra fine attached to that child, if the fine isnt paid (i think) the child gets taken to a new home. It may be a bit crule but thats what you get for not whearing a condom. And if the condom doesnt work (which can happen) then congradulations you're an annomaly get used to it. Nothing is ever going to be fair for everyone, people just have to get used to it.
So you think it's ok to take away chrildren, which is a much bigger problem than bad parenting, as well as taking away basic human rights?
I've allready covered that in my other posts.
 

Jon Etheridge

Appsro Animation
Apr 28, 2009
1,384
0
0
Oh god no! Not because it's a bad idea but because with getting a license you're going to have to go to some horrible government run establishment to get it. And if the DMV is any kind of example of what our government can cook up then those people can kiss the shittiest part of my ass.
 

sethwood

New member
Sep 25, 2009
58
0
0
If we continue to allow stupid people to breed, then this world will end up like the movie, Idocracy.
 

VicunaBlue

New member
Feb 8, 2009
684
0
0
They parents must:
-Be Athiest, or not crazy (like Carrie's mother) about religion
-Have at least a highschool diploma
-Have steady income of at least 70,000 a year
-Not have any major crimes (murder, rape, arson) on record
-Be at least 14, and younger than 75
-Be Have no genetic problems
-Have no Mental disabilities that interfere with the raising of the child
-Have a REAL IQ of at least 95
 

bodyklok

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,936
0
0
No.

Will some people be bad parents? Yes.

Will writing 'you have to take a test to have kids' down on a piece of paper stop them from having kids? No.

And what do you do then? Abort their foetus because you don't like them? Go fuck yourself.

That's all I can say without losing my temper.

EDIT: Actually, though I disagree in principle with such a license I'd have to see the criteria for it first.
 

bodyklok

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,936
0
0
sethwood said:
If we continue to allow stupid people to breed, then this world will end up like the movie, Idocracy.


EDIT: why hasn't this been posted already?
 

Cortheya

Elite Member
Jan 10, 2009
1,200
0
41
No, I don't think so....I really believe that people should have the right to do (almost) whatever they want to do.
 

itsnotyouitsme

New member
Dec 27, 2008
370
0
0
Here's how i see it. Instead of making unfit parents take a test, how about we just beat the idea that not all parents are perfect, and that their performance shall determine everything. Basically, let it be known far and wide that not all kids have to respect their parents. That not all kids have to give a rats arse about their parents. Here's how it should work, if the parent is so bad that they can stop the love that is biologically and chemically ingrained into us from birth, such a process that has taken place for millions of years and is still taking place in every animal in the world, if they can stop this process that binds you together, and make you hate them instead of love, then the kids should have full right to slap them and move out at whatever age he/she feels like. If we can beat this idea into everyone, the world would be a lot happier. But that's going against the bible so it's impossible.
 

Kuchinawa212

New member
Apr 23, 2009
5,408
0
0
EcoEclipse said:
Ew. A wigger, and a slut? 300 accounts of unprotected sex? Having sex in public? "All my girlfriends have babies, I'ma have a baby too!" And stupid? Hot damn, I think we found the winner of this year's "Most Blatant Display of Retardation" contest.

I think, after seeing that, that yes, we do need a parental exam.
OOooh you though was bad...
(granted she's number one on the list)
It'll be nice to screen people before they add to the gene pool

Note to Mods: this is bolster my argument of the need to screen people, and there is no sexually explicit content
 

Borrowed Time

New member
Jun 29, 2009
469
0
0
Are... you... kidding me!? Yes there are horrible parents in this world, but who do any of us think we are to dictate if someone can have a child or not? The blatant disregard for basic human rights and the sheer maniacle egotism of this disturbs me.

How about this then, all of you who are young enough to still be living at home, etc... We legislate this system into place with the whole "license to have children" thing right? Fines and all. Now, how about we give all the children born (at a certain age, say, 8?) a test to see if their intelligence is good enough for societal standards. Then, if they pass, great, the kids are allowed to continue in their growth and development. If they fail, they're confiscated from their parents because they are "defective" and sent to some processing facility to be recycled. :cough: How many would be up for this idea? Anyone?

Or maybe how about we make it so children (or any "child" still living in their parents home) have to do everything their parents tell them to, punishable by whiping. I bet we'd have a lot less idiots coming into this world if they didn't think they knew more then their parents. (which is almost everyone) I know a woman who'se 16 year old daughter has been running away from home over the course of the last year repeatedly and was recently gone for a month. She just came back home, pregnant, dropped out of school and begging for her mom to take her back. Maybe she should have listened to her mother to begin with?

This is an incredibly huge can of worms on a slippery slope that leads directly into a volcanic flow. I'm curious where all the "pro-choice" people are on this thread? It's the woman's body right? it's her choice? So instead lets just take that right away before they even get to that choice? Excuse me? What about everyone who is pro-legalization of weed? It's their body right, their choice?
 

Jeronus

New member
Nov 14, 2008
1,305
0
0
I am going to say no just because licenses do very little to keep dangerous and stupid people from driving. Any idiot can pretend to drive safe just once, get a license, and be speeding down the highway while texting their friends about how they passed the driver's test. The same goes for a parent license. I also believe there is no way to tell or teach someone how to raise a child because unlike cars, kids operate differently from one another. If kids could be controlled like machines, I might be in favor of a license but that is not the case.
 

Cody211282

New member
Apr 25, 2009
2,892
0
0
I want to say yes so much to this, only problem is that it really is a fundemental right so i have to say no
 

herio

New member
May 20, 2009
81
0
0
yes and it solud be like a drivers lince you can only have children when your an adult not a child and take a long test
 

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
You need a licence to fish; a licence to drive; a licence to own a pet...

And I'm fairly certain whether or not you're fit to be a parent is more important than any of those things.

If you fail the test, you leave some key bod parts at the front desk and go your merry way-- it's that simple...or is least it should be.
 

bigolbear

New member
May 18, 2009
185
0
0
I cant beleive the majority is going with 'yes' on this. i swear the world is getting more fascist by the day!

ok so we have over population - this is solved by EDUCATION and FREE CONTRACEPTION. I agree many folks are unfit parents but that does not deny there basic human right to procreate, what most of these people are suffering from is poor education, class stigma and POVERTY. further more i will remind you that you are judging these people by your standards - not theirs, everything is relative. Ultimately if the child survives to adulthood then they have been successfull parents, any other judgements are based on culture and opinion. If a 'parent test' were to be introduced you can bet it would be how well the parents could pay for the kids upbringing rather than how much love they might show the child.

All that being said i do refer to the kids hangin out on the end of my street as 'the little f-ing scrotes' i just think that education and sorting out the economy would be a beter resolution than one group of people imposing their power over another yet again.
 

kitsunema

New member
Apr 16, 2009
51
0
0
licenses? really? i know there are some people who dont have what it takes to have children but to license right to reproduce sounds alittle if not completely fascist heck then you'll want to come up with the idea just to cut out the parent middle man and create human life like brave new world
 

bigolbear

New member
May 18, 2009
185
0
0
Just had a brainstorm!

how about this for an idea:
Upon finding out about pregnancy prospective parent(s) must take a test....

If they fail - they get some free education, some help, social care to get them started. Posibly help applying for any relevant benefits they may be entitled to, and help with how to manage parenting and working life.

How does that idea grab you all?