Female. (Technically. It's complicated)
Size 0, in my understanding, Equates to size 6 where I live.
And that's pretty damn tiny. I don't think it's a good ideal for anyone to aim for unless you are in fact quite small to begin with.
By point of comparison, the national average here is size 14 (working back to US sizes, that's size 8 or so.)
And personally? I'm really quite skinny as it is. Sure, I could lose more weight, though mostly at the risk of going into territory that can only be considered anorexic...
But even if I did, I still wouldn't be able to fit into a size 6 (the local equivalent to size 0, in case you've forgotten), ever.
My skeleton by itself would probably limit me to at least size 8 even if I was scarily underweight.
It would look horrible, and I still wouldn't be small enough to fit something like that.
Impossible goals are not worth worrying about, and really, even if it were possible, what's the point?
Would I actually look better? Or is it just some stupid 'ideal' that nobody ever thinks about?
Size 0, in my understanding, Equates to size 6 where I live.
And that's pretty damn tiny. I don't think it's a good ideal for anyone to aim for unless you are in fact quite small to begin with.
By point of comparison, the national average here is size 14 (working back to US sizes, that's size 8 or so.)
And personally? I'm really quite skinny as it is. Sure, I could lose more weight, though mostly at the risk of going into territory that can only be considered anorexic...
But even if I did, I still wouldn't be able to fit into a size 6 (the local equivalent to size 0, in case you've forgotten), ever.
My skeleton by itself would probably limit me to at least size 8 even if I was scarily underweight.
It would look horrible, and I still wouldn't be small enough to fit something like that.
Impossible goals are not worth worrying about, and really, even if it were possible, what's the point?
Would I actually look better? Or is it just some stupid 'ideal' that nobody ever thinks about?