Poll: So. Stones or Beatles?

Recommended Videos

Baldry

New member
Feb 11, 2009
2,412
0
0
Neither. I haven't really heard any of their songs, or at least the good ones but the songs I have listened to weren't that good. Now Queen on the other hand...
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
GundamSentinel said:
God save the Kinks!

Okay, okay, out of those two I'd say the Stones. More my kind of music.
Exactly what he said. I never liked the Beatles, and the Stones are better, but The Kinks are amazing.

Kinks>Stones>Beatles
 

Bassman_2

New member
Feb 9, 2009
904
0
0
I grew up never knowing of the Beatles (but have heard their songs), while knowing somes Rolling Stones songs (while knowing it's by them. A single day in my life changed everything, I am now a die-hard Beatles fan.
 

Purple Shrimp

New member
Oct 7, 2008
544
0
0
tigermilk said:
Let It Be (1969) or Let It Bleed (1969). It isn't rocket science! (the point I am making is as a rhetort to Let It Be Let It Bleed pissed all over it from a great height.
let it be came out in 1970 but otherwise i completely agree!
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
Purple Shrimp said:
tigermilk said:
Let It Be (1969) or Let It Bleed (1969). It isn't rocket science! (the point I am making is as a rhetort to Let It Be Let It Bleed pissed all over it from a great height.
let it be came out in 1970 but otherwise i completely agree!
Good point, bang goes my theory. Still Let It Bleed pissed all over Abbey Road as well.
 

Purple Shrimp

New member
Oct 7, 2008
544
0
0
tigermilk said:
Purple Shrimp said:
tigermilk said:
Let It Be (1969) or Let It Bleed (1969). It isn't rocket science! (the point I am making is as a rhetort to Let It Be Let It Bleed pissed all over it from a great height.
let it be came out in 1970 but otherwise i completely agree!
Good point, bang goes my theory. Still Let It Bleed pissed all over Abbey Road as well.
it pisses over every other album ever made imo
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Chances are, even though I like them both, I like more of the Beatles than I do the Rolling Stones. So, I'm voting for the Beatles.
 

Mr.PlanetEater

New member
May 17, 2009
730
0
0
Neither give me The Who any day, but if I have to choose one then I would say the Beatles as far as their versatility. That and the only songs I like by the Stones are Lady Jane, Sister Morphine, Paint it Black, and Give Me Shelter.
 

Vandy

New member
Apr 18, 2011
115
0
0
Beatles or Stones?
The Who, of course!
Although 'Cocksucker Blues' is the best Stones song you've never heard.
 

Hawk eye1466

New member
May 31, 2010
619
0
0
Superior Mind said:
Beatles for me but the Stones are great too.

Gotta love Charlie Watts and how he deals with Mick. Great story about Mick getting drunk at a hotel bar and running his mouth off about how great he was. Mick rings up Charlie, who was in bed asleep at the hotel, and says to him something along the lines of "Hey where's my drummer get down here!"

Charlie casually gets up. Gets dressed. Makes his way down to the bar, finds Mick and floors him with one punch to the jaw. He points down at him in the silenced bar

"I'm not your drummer, you're my singer."

Charlie makes his way back upstairs and goes back to bed.
was that in one of the band members biographys? because i read that in i think Keith Richerds book and he said after Charlie punches him Mick starts sliding down the table and out the window Keith grabbes him and pulls him in when Charlie asks why he saved him Keith says because Mick's wearing my wedding jacket!

But I could never decide they both were good and I liked them both equally
 

allmadeup

New member
Jun 30, 2011
13
0
0
Beatles... but only just. I love them both, and Gimme Shelter is one of my favourite songs of all time... but then so is Strawberry Fields. Overall, there's slightly more Beatles songs that I like, but it is tight.