About my poll being terrible, I was basically just taking either answer to it's most extreme for comical effect. Sorry, I thought most people would catch on.Jinx_Dragon said:I say wut... cause your choices are pretty damn poor.
The swine flu exists, it is just a disease and as flu go it isn't even all that bad. The problem is it was a slow news week or something.... guess Michael Jackson can't die every day like they so wish. This means the media had to report on something. Given that the US media is all about ratings and nothing boosts ratings like 'hear it first on our chennal' driven fear it was enviable they would jump on swine flu like they did bird flu and whatever ailment comes out each year.
I don't think there is a conspiracy behind this, let alone a government one (and would you want them in charge of your conspiracies?) It is just a sad fact of today's existence: TV news hype up EVERYTHING they think will cause even a single extra viewer. Sensationalism, sensationalism, sensationalism!
It sells.
My view: wake me up when it kills, say, .5% of the world population. Given that this disease has such a dismal kill rate it couldn't even achieve that if we all got infected so I think I will sleep easy.
Frankly, I'm more worried about the fact that they are rushing untested vaccines to the public to combat an imaginary catastrophe. Flu vaccines aren't something you want to screw up--the 1976 "swine flu outbreak" killed one person, and the vaccine killed 25.kazuki landen said:I'm so tempted to go into a 'government making loads of hype so they can give everyone injections to control us all, instead of the vaccine they say they're giving us' rant, but common sense will prevail and keep me from doing so.
It actually put me out of it for nearly 2 weeks. But I guess it effects people of different health differently.ucciolord1 said:The only good that came out of it was a few school closings, and the worst that came out of it was like 20 deaths. A life (or 20) isn't to be taken lightly, but they made up such a huge deal about a global pandemic that would kill us all, it's a bit silly to see people panic over something that can be cured by two days in bed and a bowl of chicken soup.
Thats actually wutAnacortian said:I think I fall somewhere between those two very extreme answers. So.... Wuh?
More likely, but way less fun. (In stupid house-wifey advert voice): Orwellian paranoia - adds that little bit of unreasonable fear to any conversation.Vuljatar said:Frankly, I'm more worried about the fact that they are rushing untested vaccines to the public to combat an imaginary catastrophe. Flu vaccines aren't something you want to screw up--the 1976 "swine flu outbreak" killed one person, and the vaccine killed 25.kazuki landen said:I'm so tempted to go into a 'government making loads of hype so they can give everyone injections to control us all, instead of the vaccine they say they're giving us' rant, but common sense will prevail and keep me from doing so.
But the chicken soup helped, right?ExaltedK9 said:It actually put me out of it for nearly 2 weeks. But I guess it effects people of different health differently.ucciolord1 said:The only good that came out of it was a few school closings, and the worst that came out of it was like 20 deaths. A life (or 20) isn't to be taken lightly, but they made up such a huge deal about a global pandemic that would kill us all, it's a bit silly to see people panic over something that can be cured by two days in bed and a bowl of chicken soup.
Oh yes, immensely. And thats why people are overreacting @.@ucciolord1 said:But the chicken soup helped, right?ExaltedK9 said:It actually put me out of it for nearly 2 weeks. But I guess it effects people of different health differently.ucciolord1 said:The only good that came out of it was a few school closings, and the worst that came out of it was like 20 deaths. A life (or 20) isn't to be taken lightly, but they made up such a huge deal about a global pandemic that would kill us all, it's a bit silly to see people panic over something that can be cured by two days in bed and a bowl of chicken soup.
Thisss. Poll needs to be revised. Swine flu is real. No one should care. This is just more evidence of how useless our mainstream media is. Fuck swine flu.Jinx_Dragon said:I say wut... cause your choices are pretty damn poor.
The swine flu exists, it is just a disease and as flu go it isn't even all that bad. The problem is it was a slow news week or something.... guess Michael Jackson can't die every day like they so wish. This means the media had to report on something. Given that the US media is all about ratings and nothing boosts ratings like 'hear it first on our chennal' driven fear it was enviable they would jump on swine flu like they did bird flu and whatever ailment comes out each year.
I don't think there is a conspiracy behind this, let alone a government one (and would you want them in charge of your conspiracies?) It is just a sad fact of today's existence: TV news hype up EVERYTHING they think will cause even a single extra viewer. Sensationalism, sensationalism, sensationalism!
It sells.
My view: wake me up when it kills, say, .5% of the world population. Given that this disease has such a dismal kill rate it couldn't even achieve that if we all got infected so I think I will sleep easy.