lasherman said:
The whole "used games are a parasitic drain on game developers" argument is bullshit. It can be used to target literally ANY product being sold.
Seriously, just replace the word "videogame" with the word "car", or "books" or even "trombone", and you can make a case about how used "nouns" are killing the "noun" industry.
Hey, man, it's noun-repeaters like
you who are encouraging the stagnation of the English language! I make a point to use brand new words that I make up whenever morphatan.
nuba km said:
Matt_LRR said:
Game stop isn't a monopoly at all.
They happen to be the only national chain of specialty game retailers. They are so far from the only game retailers that the idea of their being a proper monopoly is laughable.
-m
game another big game retailer also that is why we have to support the independent retailers so their is more of a competition for game stop meaning things will be better for the game industry.
Maybe OP (and a few others) aren't entirely sure what a monopoly is. See, "mono" is a derivative of 'mono' and 'pōl,' meaning single, alone, etc and 'to sell,' respectively.
See, Carnegie Steel was a monopoly because it bought virtually every manufacturer of note that produced steel, from mining of ore to refining and selling. J.D. Rockefeller simply bought every oil
refinery available, assuring that no one could make a profit from pumping or shipping oil unless they first let him have a hand in it.
With that in mind...why can I buy games from places other than Gamestop? And why are most of those places horrid, faceless corporations manned by drones of questionable immigration status or mental health, while my local Gamestop is a small storefront manned by friendly and knowledgeable gamers?