Maybe you should add another choice on that there poll, say, conscientious objector (and don't quote that defective pile of nuts and bolts Bender at me).
I would not willingly go if someone tells me to go kill or die for their cause without my consent.
I'd say that giving consent to be killed or maimed and to take lives is a sight more important than even consent in sexual matters and I'm practically a wonk on that particular issue as it is.
It had better be a very good cause to get me to give up everything that I have and ever could have or to take that from others to get me to fight to the death over it. If a conflict can be resolved by gradually eroding the opposition's beliefs through art (any medium and every medium, even videogames)or simple conversation, it's no go for me. If it is just some natural resource, that's worth turning one's back on a country for unless one's country is in dire need. If it is for a nebulous, ill defined abstract concept such as 'Freedom', I'll likely want to fight whoever uses such words with me. Free knuckle sandwiches all around. They had best hope that there is free health care where ever and when ever they ran afoul of me.
Hmm. That might be worth fighting over and that's the way to fight. Ah,whatever happened to melee brawling outside of wrestling, videogames and sports riots? Does it always have to be guns and knives (and tanks and flamethrowers and missiles,etcetera), anyway? Can't wars be food fights or water gun battles...unless it is over food or clean water?
I could probably just jump ship to Nigeria if America gets too insistent on the Draft,anyway. Nigeria could probably benefit from another revolution right now,however,but a non-violent one. They don't need another armed conflict to wreck things up worse than they already are.