Your sending someone you dont know to fight, and possibly die in your place.Rutawitz said:last time i checked war is murder. and i dont like murder. so i would not go to war.Mcface said:If you run, you are a selfish coward, and possibly a murderer.
If you run, they draft someone else to take your place.
So you send someone else off to fight, just because you are a coward.
so because i dont believe in murder, it makes me a coward?
Wow, unbelievable.Mcface said:Your sending someone you dont know to fight, and possibly die in your place.
thats cowardice, yes.
Sure you can.Skeleon said:Wow, unbelievable.Mcface said:Your sending someone you dont know to fight, and possibly die in your place.
thats cowardice, yes.
Some people have ethical principles that prevent them from willingly taking another person's life.
Like doctors that follow the Physician's Oath (based on the Hippocratic one), but it's certainly not limited to only them.
One cannot be held responsible for the actions of the state (i.e., sending another person in your stead).
That's not a valid point, that'd be like a thug with a gun asking me whom to shoot.Mcface said:Sure you can.
Because you chose not to go, which is obviously your decision, and your actions, someone else is sent BECAUSE of YOU.
What does a "serving non-combatant" do, exactly? Does he still wear a uniform or is a civilian in a supporting role, away from the front-lines?odubya23 said:Of course not, that's why, even in the US, one can conscienciously object, or chose to serve as a non-combatant.
Going to war does not meaning dying. You can also die any minute while not at war.ae86gamer said:I'd run and hide. I like America, but I'm not gonna die for it.