Abedeus said:I cut out the part I didn't want to comment. You kinda lost the moment you said you are not going to even try arguing with sense.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Oooh, so you just admitted you are trolling here just to troll.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:You really don't understand? It was a statement.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:First of all, it's "argument".Evil Jak said:Its as flawed as your arguement, if it had no flaws then it would have got 100%. Also, "one of the best PC games ever" is like saying "Its the best way to get herpes".Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
Also, it doesn't have 100% because it's an average. Out of 81 reviews.
It IS one of the best PC games ever. Seriously, 96%? That's like saying a student with 96% average is not one of the best students, if there are few thousands of other students in a school. And there are no people with 100%. I want to see a person (in high school, of course) with a 96% average out of 81 marks.
And there is no "the best way to get herpes". There are "few of the best ways to get herpes". See the difference? No? I know you don't, not sure even why do I argue with you.
Sorta lost what you were getting at after... well after you started typing, huh? =D
"Not sure even why do I argue with you" It sounded like a question but there wasnt the appropriate punctuation at the end, are you dyslexic? That would explain it.
And now I say it the second time - I have no freakin' idea why am I still replying. You didn't bother to answer me if you know anyone with a 96% average.
Face it - HL2 is the best PC game according to Metacritics, and they take in account dozens of reviews. And one of the best PC games in any site/magazine, you name it.*
*- At least country-wide, of course, because I don't care what some school paper says about anything.
I decided, upon principle, to ignore any point you made
/reported and moving away, slowly. Also, notice this thing, on the right of the page:
http://www.metacritic.com/games/pc/
Out of the Park Baseball 2007? WOT? This game is so unknown, it's gotten only 5 reviews so far. And it's 2009 already.
It's easier to get a 96% from 5 reviews than 81 reviews. Oh, and Bioshock has half the reviews, too.
Oh, how pitiful your actions are. Taking my message out of context by deleting about 85% of my message just to try and support you ban attempt, you kinda undercut your attempt though when you refered to something I said which is non-existence in your quote and people will have to see my original post to see what you are talking about.
You are resorting to back-handed techniques in order to silence any opposing voice, you know who else did that... Hitler and the Nazi's.
But now you lost thanks to Godwin's law. Sorry.
They are all great games and now they have it's on a thread were people get to decide which one they enjoyed the least.Captain Urahara said:Why include Half-Life 2 in there? That was a fantastic game and is drastically different from every other game in the list.
Yeah, a brainMister Benoit said:I've tried and tried to get into Half Life 2, I just couldn't, same goes for the rest of the Orange Box, guess a part of me is missing inside or something.
Average at today's standards. And it was made nearly 10 years ago.Mazty said:Half Life 2.
Blatant whacking off of an average physics engine
Nope, sorry, the first person to apply Godwin's law is the loser. Sad, but true.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:I cut out the part I didn't want to comment. You kinda lost the moment you said you are not going to even try arguing with sense.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Oooh, so you just admitted you are trolling here just to troll.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:You really don't understand? It was a statement.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:First of all, it's "argument".Evil Jak said:Its as flawed as your arguement, if it had no flaws then it would have got 100%. Also, "one of the best PC games ever" is like saying "Its the best way to get herpes".Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
Also, it doesn't have 100% because it's an average. Out of 81 reviews.
It IS one of the best PC games ever. Seriously, 96%? That's like saying a student with 96% average is not one of the best students, if there are few thousands of other students in a school. And there are no people with 100%. I want to see a person (in high school, of course) with a 96% average out of 81 marks.
And there is no "the best way to get herpes". There are "few of the best ways to get herpes". See the difference? No? I know you don't, not sure even why do I argue with you.
Sorta lost what you were getting at after... well after you started typing, huh? =D
"Not sure even why do I argue with you" It sounded like a question but there wasnt the appropriate punctuation at the end, are you dyslexic? That would explain it.
And now I say it the second time - I have no freakin' idea why am I still replying. You didn't bother to answer me if you know anyone with a 96% average.
Face it - HL2 is the best PC game according to Metacritics, and they take in account dozens of reviews. And one of the best PC games in any site/magazine, you name it.*
*- At least country-wide, of course, because I don't care what some school paper says about anything.
I decided, upon principle, to ignore any point you made
/reported and moving away, slowly. Also, notice this thing, on the right of the page:
http://www.metacritic.com/games/pc/
Out of the Park Baseball 2007? WOT? This game is so unknown, it's gotten only 5 reviews so far. And it's 2009 already.
It's easier to get a 96% from 5 reviews than 81 reviews. Oh, and Bioshock has half the reviews, too.
Oh, how pitiful your actions are. Taking my message out of context by deleting about 85% of my message just to try and support you ban attempt, you kinda undercut your attempt though when you refered to something I said which is non-existence in your quote and people will have to see my original post to see what you are talking about.
You are resorting to back-handed techniques in order to silence any opposing voice, you know who else did that... Hitler and the Nazi's.
But now you lost thanks to Godwin's law. Sorry.
Hmm, except I never said I wasnt going to argue with sense. So have you decided to argue both my part and yours? Because I dont think thats a very fair arguement when you can just put words in my mouth. Also, Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies being applied doesn't mean that an arguement is lost... all it means is that this has been a relatively lengthy debate. Seriously, try that crap on someone below 12 years of age.
Edit: Sorry forgot to mention... Quirk's Exception, BEHATCH! You see you abused Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies by calling it Godwin's Law which shows you had the expressed intention of ending the debate with it and expecting it to be a diversion. However I wasnt aiming my "Nazi" comparison at any of your comments, I was aiming it at the unjust techniques that you employed outside of the debate in order to quell my expressed opposition to your point of view. So I think you will find, if anything, you lost back when you decided to be such a rascal and tried to remove me from the debate.
Oh and "I cut out the part I didn't want to comment" would have worked... if you didnt comment on the part you cut! You are using rather shady techniques and a lesser man would have given in to your tyranny by now but I refuse to let you think you can bully people into believing you, so this debate is now over... and of course I have already won by default for reasons already expressed.
WTF?B T A M R D said:I'de say Half-Life 2 because it's crap and over-rated
Abedeus said:Nope, sorry, the first person to apply Godwin's law is the loser. Sad, but true.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:I cut out the part I didn't want to comment. You kinda lost the moment you said you are not going to even try arguing with sense.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Oooh, so you just admitted you are trolling here just to troll.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:You really don't understand? It was a statement.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:First of all, it's "argument".Evil Jak said:Its as flawed as your arguement, if it had no flaws then it would have got 100%. Also, "one of the best PC games ever" is like saying "Its the best way to get herpes".Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
Also, it doesn't have 100% because it's an average. Out of 81 reviews.
It IS one of the best PC games ever. Seriously, 96%? That's like saying a student with 96% average is not one of the best students, if there are few thousands of other students in a school. And there are no people with 100%. I want to see a person (in high school, of course) with a 96% average out of 81 marks.
And there is no "the best way to get herpes". There are "few of the best ways to get herpes". See the difference? No? I know you don't, not sure even why do I argue with you.
Sorta lost what you were getting at after... well after you started typing, huh? =D
"Not sure even why do I argue with you" It sounded like a question but there wasnt the appropriate punctuation at the end, are you dyslexic? That would explain it.
And now I say it the second time - I have no freakin' idea why am I still replying. You didn't bother to answer me if you know anyone with a 96% average.
Face it - HL2 is the best PC game according to Metacritics, and they take in account dozens of reviews. And one of the best PC games in any site/magazine, you name it.*
*- At least country-wide, of course, because I don't care what some school paper says about anything.
I decided, upon principle, to ignore any point you made
/reported and moving away, slowly. Also, notice this thing, on the right of the page:
http://www.metacritic.com/games/pc/
Out of the Park Baseball 2007? WOT? This game is so unknown, it's gotten only 5 reviews so far. And it's 2009 already.
It's easier to get a 96% from 5 reviews than 81 reviews. Oh, and Bioshock has half the reviews, too.
Oh, how pitiful your actions are. Taking my message out of context by deleting about 85% of my message just to try and support you ban attempt, you kinda undercut your attempt though when you refered to something I said which is non-existence in your quote and people will have to see my original post to see what you are talking about.
You are resorting to back-handed techniques in order to silence any opposing voice, you know who else did that... Hitler and the Nazi's.
But now you lost thanks to Godwin's law. Sorry.
Hmm, except I never said I wasnt going to argue with sense. So have you decided to argue both my part and yours? Because I dont think thats a very fair arguement when you can just put words in my mouth. Also, Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies being applied doesn't mean that an arguement is lost... all it means is that this has been a relatively lengthy debate. Seriously, try that crap on someone below 12 years of age.
Edit: Sorry forgot to mention... Quirk's Exception, BEHATCH! You see you abused Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies by calling it Godwin's Law which shows you had the expressed intention of ending the debate with it and expecting it to be a diversion. However I wasnt aiming my "Nazi" comparison at any of your comments, I was aiming it at the unjust techniques that you employed outside of the debate in order to quell my expressed opposition to your point of view. So I think you will find, if anything, you lost back when you decided to be such a rascal and tried to remove me from the debate.
Oh and "I cut out the part I didn't want to comment" would have worked... if you didnt comment on the part you cut! You are using rather shady techniques and a lesser man would have given in to your tyranny by now but I refuse to let you think you can bully people into believing you, so this debate is now over... and of course I have already won by default for reasons already expressed.
And now to delight myself in my awesome TYRANNY (Ahhaahhahah). Btw, you have not actually used a single argument why this isn't one of the best games on PC, even if the biggest score-calculating site on the Internet says so.
Uhm. I didn't ignore. I responded. Maybe you are just too full of yourself.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Nope, sorry, the first person to apply Godwin's law is the loser. Sad, but true.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:I cut out the part I didn't want to comment. You kinda lost the moment you said you are not going to even try arguing with sense.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Oooh, so you just admitted you are trolling here just to troll.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:You really don't understand? It was a statement.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:First of all, it's "argument".Evil Jak said:Its as flawed as your arguement, if it had no flaws then it would have got 100%. Also, "one of the best PC games ever" is like saying "Its the best way to get herpes".Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
Also, it doesn't have 100% because it's an average. Out of 81 reviews.
It IS one of the best PC games ever. Seriously, 96%? That's like saying a student with 96% average is not one of the best students, if there are few thousands of other students in a school. And there are no people with 100%. I want to see a person (in high school, of course) with a 96% average out of 81 marks.
And there is no "the best way to get herpes". There are "few of the best ways to get herpes". See the difference? No? I know you don't, not sure even why do I argue with you.
Sorta lost what you were getting at after... well after you started typing, huh? =D
"Not sure even why do I argue with you" It sounded like a question but there wasnt the appropriate punctuation at the end, are you dyslexic? That would explain it.
And now I say it the second time - I have no freakin' idea why am I still replying. You didn't bother to answer me if you know anyone with a 96% average.
Face it - HL2 is the best PC game according to Metacritics, and they take in account dozens of reviews. And one of the best PC games in any site/magazine, you name it.*
*- At least country-wide, of course, because I don't care what some school paper says about anything.
I decided, upon principle, to ignore any point you made
/reported and moving away, slowly. Also, notice this thing, on the right of the page:
http://www.metacritic.com/games/pc/
Out of the Park Baseball 2007? WOT? This game is so unknown, it's gotten only 5 reviews so far. And it's 2009 already.
It's easier to get a 96% from 5 reviews than 81 reviews. Oh, and Bioshock has half the reviews, too.
Oh, how pitiful your actions are. Taking my message out of context by deleting about 85% of my message just to try and support you ban attempt, you kinda undercut your attempt though when you refered to something I said which is non-existence in your quote and people will have to see my original post to see what you are talking about.
You are resorting to back-handed techniques in order to silence any opposing voice, you know who else did that... Hitler and the Nazi's.
But now you lost thanks to Godwin's law. Sorry.
Hmm, except I never said I wasnt going to argue with sense. So have you decided to argue both my part and yours? Because I dont think thats a very fair arguement when you can just put words in my mouth. Also, Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies being applied doesn't mean that an arguement is lost... all it means is that this has been a relatively lengthy debate. Seriously, try that crap on someone below 12 years of age.
Edit: Sorry forgot to mention... Quirk's Exception, BEHATCH! You see you abused Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies by calling it Godwin's Law which shows you had the expressed intention of ending the debate with it and expecting it to be a diversion. However I wasnt aiming my "Nazi" comparison at any of your comments, I was aiming it at the unjust techniques that you employed outside of the debate in order to quell my expressed opposition to your point of view. So I think you will find, if anything, you lost back when you decided to be such a rascal and tried to remove me from the debate.
Oh and "I cut out the part I didn't want to comment" would have worked... if you didnt comment on the part you cut! You are using rather shady techniques and a lesser man would have given in to your tyranny by now but I refuse to let you think you can bully people into believing you, so this debate is now over... and of course I have already won by default for reasons already expressed.
And now to delight myself in my awesome TYRANNY (Ahhaahhahah). Btw, you have not actually used a single argument why this isn't one of the best games on PC, even if the biggest score-calculating site on the Internet says so.
Hmm, except its not true is it. I told you why it isnt true and yet you dont listen, thats quite ignorant of you. Also, yes I did give you examples of other games that got the same score and you just put your fingers in your ears and looked away. Its pointless arguing with you because you are exactly what Yahtzee describes as a "fan", that and you are very arrogant.
TaborMallory said:...how is this thread still alive??
Hmm, I called you arrogant so you responded by calling me "too full of myself"... rewording what I say and then sending it back my way isnt going to fly here. And you clearly did ignore what I said... the fact that you persisted with trying to apply Godwin's Law after I told you how you were wrong shows that you ignored how I slapped in your face with facts! You do know that I dont have short-term memory loss, right? And you are aware that when you say something it doesnt automatically become fact, right?Abedeus said:Uhm. I didn't ignore. I responded. Maybe you are just too full of yourself.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Nope, sorry, the first person to apply Godwin's law is the loser. Sad, but true.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:I cut out the part I didn't want to comment. You kinda lost the moment you said you are not going to even try arguing with sense.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:Oooh, so you just admitted you are trolling here just to troll.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:You really don't understand? It was a statement.Evil Jak said:Abedeus said:First of all, it's "argument".Evil Jak said:Its as flawed as your arguement, if it had no flaws then it would have got 100%. Also, "one of the best PC games ever" is like saying "Its the best way to get herpes".Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
Also, it doesn't have 100% because it's an average. Out of 81 reviews.
It IS one of the best PC games ever. Seriously, 96%? That's like saying a student with 96% average is not one of the best students, if there are few thousands of other students in a school. And there are no people with 100%. I want to see a person (in high school, of course) with a 96% average out of 81 marks.
And there is no "the best way to get herpes". There are "few of the best ways to get herpes". See the difference? No? I know you don't, not sure even why do I argue with you.
Sorta lost what you were getting at after... well after you started typing, huh? =D
"Not sure even why do I argue with you" It sounded like a question but there wasnt the appropriate punctuation at the end, are you dyslexic? That would explain it.
And now I say it the second time - I have no freakin' idea why am I still replying. You didn't bother to answer me if you know anyone with a 96% average.
Face it - HL2 is the best PC game according to Metacritics, and they take in account dozens of reviews. And one of the best PC games in any site/magazine, you name it.*
*- At least country-wide, of course, because I don't care what some school paper says about anything.
I decided, upon principle, to ignore any point you made
/reported and moving away, slowly. Also, notice this thing, on the right of the page:
http://www.metacritic.com/games/pc/
Out of the Park Baseball 2007? WOT? This game is so unknown, it's gotten only 5 reviews so far. And it's 2009 already.
It's easier to get a 96% from 5 reviews than 81 reviews. Oh, and Bioshock has half the reviews, too.
Oh, how pitiful your actions are. Taking my message out of context by deleting about 85% of my message just to try and support you ban attempt, you kinda undercut your attempt though when you refered to something I said which is non-existence in your quote and people will have to see my original post to see what you are talking about.
You are resorting to back-handed techniques in order to silence any opposing voice, you know who else did that... Hitler and the Nazi's.
But now you lost thanks to Godwin's law. Sorry.
Hmm, except I never said I wasnt going to argue with sense. So have you decided to argue both my part and yours? Because I dont think thats a very fair arguement when you can just put words in my mouth. Also, Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies being applied doesn't mean that an arguement is lost... all it means is that this has been a relatively lengthy debate. Seriously, try that crap on someone below 12 years of age.
Edit: Sorry forgot to mention... Quirk's Exception, BEHATCH! You see you abused Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies by calling it Godwin's Law which shows you had the expressed intention of ending the debate with it and expecting it to be a diversion. However I wasnt aiming my "Nazi" comparison at any of your comments, I was aiming it at the unjust techniques that you employed outside of the debate in order to quell my expressed opposition to your point of view. So I think you will find, if anything, you lost back when you decided to be such a rascal and tried to remove me from the debate.
Oh and "I cut out the part I didn't want to comment" would have worked... if you didnt comment on the part you cut! You are using rather shady techniques and a lesser man would have given in to your tyranny by now but I refuse to let you think you can bully people into believing you, so this debate is now over... and of course I have already won by default for reasons already expressed.
And now to delight myself in my awesome TYRANNY (Ahhaahhahah). Btw, you have not actually used a single argument why this isn't one of the best games on PC, even if the biggest score-calculating site on the Internet says so.
Hmm, except its not true is it. I told you why it isnt true and yet you dont listen, thats quite ignorant of you. Also, yes I did give you examples of other games that got the same score and you just put your fingers in your ears and looked away. Its pointless arguing with you because you are exactly what Yahtzee describes as a "fan", that and you are very arrogant.
Those other games either:
a) are unknown (that sport game with 96 got only 5 reviews - two less and it wouldn't even be shown on the list)
b) got less, a lot less reviews.
There you go. Now stop trolling.
UncleUlty said:TaborMallory said:...how is this thread still alive??
Because Half life and FF7 people want it to keep going
Who's a little fanboy? You're a little fanboy!Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
Oh please, at least the troll before tried to use arguments.WrongSprite said:Who's a little fanboy? You're a little fanboy!Abedeus said:Half Life 2.
Who.
THE HELL.
Put... that... game...
IN THE POLL?! You should be ashamed.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/pc/halflife2
Now. Say it again. Say Half Life 2 has a flaw. 96. From 81 reviews. One of the best PC games ever.
I don't particularly like Half life 2, just cause you like it, doesn't mean everybody else should.
Sorry, but that's not me losing a discussion to Godwin's law by comparing someone to Hitler AND Nazi, then denying it and ignoring all arguments.Evil Jak said:UncleUlty said:TaborMallory said:...how is this thread still alive??
Because Half life and FF7 people want it to keep going
Yeah, sorry about this. I dont even want to continue but the other guy is a typical 16 year old who thinks he knows everything, I think he could do with knocking down a couple of thousand pegs.