Poll: Time Travel is Impossible, or at the Very Best, Highly Unlikely

Recommended Videos

PrimoThePro

New member
Jun 23, 2009
1,458
0
0
crudus said:
PrimoThePro said:
No joke poll options up in this thread!
EDIT: Okay guys, I'm seriously enjoying the discussion we have going on. I read a little about Multi-Dimensional travel. Do multiple dimensions even exist? And if so, how could we even get to them?
Counter question: why are you picking at problems when we haven't even proven they will be an issue? Time travel is theoretically possible. Physicists are currently working on it. Right now the math says you can't go to a point before the time machine was made. That is about as far as they have gotten. The first step is to send a particle through time and go from there. We aren't just going to start with a human and figure out calibration from there.

As far as the second one, do you mean multiple dimensions or multiple universes?
You are correct, they wouldn't jump the gun and go straight to people, but how would they track that one particle? How could you choose where it ends up? If it doesn't show up, but disappeared, where did it go?
I'm pretty sure I mean multiple dimensions. But multiple Universes, made up of different galaxies would be interesting to ponder. To be honest, I have never even heard of multiple dimensions being used for time travel, and that is what I am asking here.
 

Aeterna

New member
Oct 4, 2010
39
0
0
in a documentary i saw Steven Hawking was talking about time travel and he believes that travelling in the future may be possible but not into the past, he managed to pull off some quite convincing ideas that I'm not even going to try to reiterate.
 

Nazz3

New member
Sep 11, 2009
861
0
0
Eaglesolidus said:
you can go fowards if you go fast enough listen to stephen hawking
Yeah, if you go faster than light. Only thing is that nothing moves faster than light.
 

SuperNashwan

New member
Oct 1, 2010
213
0
0
The moment we invent faster than light, or even near light speed travel, we essentially invent a time machine anyway. The closer you get to light speed, the slower time passes. If you travelled at light speed away from our planet for a day and came back, when you return to earth a great deal more than a day will have passed for those who stayed on earth. So from the point of view of the people in the spaceship, they have traveled into the future. Relativity is going to be a ***** for anyone who has appointments to keep.
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
Holy shit. At my vote, its 84 to 84. Perfect 50% split.

But anyway.

Even if time travel were possible, it would be completely moot.

The earth spins at over one thousand miles per hour. It revolves around the sun at sixty-seven thousand miles per hour. The sun orbits the Milky Way at a speed I don't know off the top of my head, bit it's huge. The Milky Way hurtles through intergalactic space even faster than that.

If you travel just one second in time, you might still be within the circumference of Pluto's orbit when you die in the cold vacuum of space.

PS: Ten bucks to anyone who knows what I'm quoting.
 

thethingthatlurks

New member
Feb 16, 2010
2,102
0
0
Eaglesolidus said:
if time travel were possible we would see people from the future and it would create a time paradox people are stupid for thinking its possible
Just as with this grammar thing. Damn punctuation marks...people are stupid for using 'em!

Staskala said:
thethingthatlurks said:
No, the information is the key! otherwise you just have a bunch of elementary particles without any coherent...anything. It doesn't matter if you can transport matter. Matter is everywhere, you just need to present it with the correct information.
But in that case you only shift the problem from teleportation to creating artificial biological matter in less time than it would take to bring it there the "normal" way, which is equally ludicrous.
*shrugs* In my work, we just give that problem to the engineers and let them worry about it. You wanted to know what teleportation is, and you've got it. It's not fancy, it's not convenient, but it's damn fun to think about.
 

Nazz3

New member
Sep 11, 2009
861
0
0
TheDrunkNinja said:
Holy shit. At my vote, its 84 to 84. Perfect 50% split.

But anyway.

Even if time travel were possible, it would be completely moot.

The earth spins at over one thousand miles per hour. It revolves around the sun at sixty-seven thousand miles per hour. The sun orbits the Milky Way at a speed I don't know off the top of my head, bit it's huge. The Milky Way hurtles through intergalactic space even faster than that.

If you travel just one second in time, you might still be within the circumference of Pluto's orbit when you die in the cold vacuum of space.

PS: Ten bucks to anyone who knows what I'm quoting.
...OP?
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
heavymedicombo said:
TheDrunkNinja said:
Holy shit. At my vote, its 84 to 84. Perfect 50% split.

But anyway.

Even if time travel were possible, it would be completely moot.

The earth spins at over one thousand miles per hour. It revolves around the sun at sixty-seven thousand miles per hour. The sun orbits the Milky Way at a speed I don't know off the top of my head, bit it's huge. The Milky Way hurtles through intergalactic space even faster than that.

If you travel just one second in time, you might still be within the circumference of Pluto's orbit when you die in the cold vacuum of space.

PS: Ten bucks to anyone who knows what I'm quoting.
"the meaning of life"?

Nope. And, yes, the image was absolutely necessary. :D
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
Time travel is the magic of the modern age, I think. A hypothetical goalpost based in nonphysical possibilities and wild guesses. Which is interesting, as the flow of time is a logical, rather than physical, construct as well. I would conjecture that the only place where one could "rewind the record" would be from outside the universe itself - and that we'll never get there. One might simulate it, hypothetically, by constructing a new universe with a structure identical to that of a short time back - but to do so would require literally more matter than exists in the universe, just as a hypothetical simulation of the entire universe would.

But that's just my opinion.

Whether or not Stephen Hawking thinks it's possible makes small difference - he's a man. An intelligent man, sure, but just a man, and he is fallible.

And the argument of "a thousand years ago X was thought impossible" is logically flawed - it could be paired with any desired result with the same chance of occurring - for instance, "Will it be possible someday to transform all humanity simultaneously into polka-dotted ligers?"

...only in Scribblenauts. Which, come to think of it, also applies to time travel. And Cthulhu.
 

SomethingUnrelated

New member
Aug 29, 2009
2,855
0
0
thespis721 said:
I think a lot of scientists spend their time focusing on the speed aspect of travel... in the future, they may find a way, and I'll be surprised if it has NOTHING to do with speed or movement at all.
With all due respect mate, if you've cracked this, I find it hard to believe that humanity's greatest minds are struggling with it...
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
Nazz3 said:
TheDrunkNinja said:
Holy shit. At my vote, its 84 to 84. Perfect 50% split.

But anyway.

Even if time travel were possible, it would be completely moot.

The earth spins at over one thousand miles per hour. It revolves around the sun at sixty-seven thousand miles per hour. The sun orbits the Milky Way at a speed I don't know off the top of my head, bit it's huge. The Milky Way hurtles through intergalactic space even faster than that.

If you travel just one second in time, you might still be within the circumference of Pluto's orbit when you die in the cold vacuum of space.

PS: Ten bucks to anyone who knows what I'm quoting.
...OP?
In a way, but I'm under the impression that he got his conclusion from where I got my quote.
 

archvile93

New member
Sep 2, 2009
2,564
0
0
If I have read scientists' reports correctly, backwards time travel is immpossible. However, it is still theoretically possible to travel foreward in time.
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
Wait, three pages and nobody mentioned the ancient hole in time travel? Gawd, I expect better from you all:

Rule 1 of Time Travel: It doesn't exist and is not possible, because if it was someone would have transported it back in time by now.