Poll: Ultimate Sacrifice

Recommended Videos

Emissary Laito

New member
Jun 15, 2010
167
0
0
Eh, dunno. I might if the world wasn't perfect, just better, a perfect world would be boring.

ZephyrFireStrom said:
For the greater good of what? These humans are worth jack. The majority of them are unoriginal clones that flock to the next best thing, that best thing being something entirely irrelevent. What good there is left in the world is dwindling, hanging by a thread, vastly out numbered by the corrupted. There isn't enough good on the planet to stop the spread of corruption. To prolong the human race is to doom the universe.
Fucking LOL!

I disagree with this entirely. The misanthropy is bad enough, but the idea that we could doom the universe on our own is laughable.

I'm curious, how old are you?
 

JLML

New member
Feb 18, 2010
1,452
0
0
Nope, I would not. Mostly 'cause I don't care too much about humanity. Also, humanity itself is kinda one of the problems of today, so... Yea. Also, I don't want to have to watch the world go on, no matter how perfect, since I'd get so bored I'd find a way to destroy it just to get away from it.

Also, there can be no good without evil. Thus, if I remove everything that is "bad" (which also just depends on the point of view, what is a problem to some is something good for others) in the world, I would also remove the possibility for most good things.
 

Layzor

New member
Feb 18, 2009
731
0
0
So nothing I did ever happened. Does that include making the sacrifice?


I'm on to you Lucifer.
 

Magicmad5511

New member
May 26, 2011
637
0
0
I would not. Partly for the selfish "I don't want to be trapped forever in hat is essentially hell"
The main reason though? While the world sucks at times and I will complain about whenever possible, it is still a world of free will. There being bad in the world is what highlights the good and makes it feel all the better.
If you got rid of all the bad, even if it was just the massive evil's, then people would eventually come up against this power effecting their free will.

You can't have good without bad. You just gotta focus on the good and only briefly deal with the bad.
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
Do we honestly need the bad to make it more exciting? (I was reading the past posts.) I mean surely people can still have fun without the negative traits like e.g. no more car accidents from drunk driving or do you really like being insulted by a kid online in a fps game? Or are we talking about the utopia future in the film Demolition Man in that cursing and kissing is illigal? (With that I can understand about.)
I can get it's without evil there is no good but still.

OT- I would say yes but depending if I can choose when I where I get erased. I don't want to leave the worlds with regrets.
 
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
Yeah, sure, that sounds awesome. It's even better if I can live forever because then I'm like an eternal guardian of Earth, I'll just feel truly awesome. Then, when my sacrifice is inevitably squandered, I can hate humanity and call them monsters.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,872
0
0
The_Vigilant said:
DEATHROAD said:
AccursedTheory said:
Would I erase myself from history to rob every single person on the planet of their free will?

That's not an ultimate sacrifice, thats the biggest dick move ever conceived. Made even worse since you wouldn't exist anymore, and no one would have anyone to blame for the lose of free will (And they couldn't play the blame game anyway, since that requires a little bit of self interest).
Interesting take on it, but im alittle confused, how exactly is it robbing people of their free will?
He's sort of a jerk and he's saying people have the right to kill, rape, and steal. Oh, also that people born into impossible odds (orphans in sub-Saharan Africa) are thankful for their freedom to try and fail, as opposed to the tyranny of the situation being fixed by an outside force.

He's pretty much an idiot who has never left his house.
That's not what he's saying.

At all.
Basically, you'd be preventing people from doing anything which may have negative impact on anyone else ever, which is the removal of free will. Everything would be exactly the same, and nothing would ever be done.

Think, please.
 

Dejanus

New member
Jul 15, 2010
120
0
0
I would do it, and likely kill myself soon after. I imagine that degree of solitude would grate on even my sanity, and above all I want to die as myself.
 

Silent_Protagonist

New member
Jul 6, 2011
55
0
0
Even though I live my life with the thought: "To be forgotten is worse than death" I would make the sacrifice. Something inside of me just knows the benefits of billions out way the benefits of one. Even if that one, is me.
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
That's not an ultimate sacrifice, thats the biggest dick move ever conceived. Made even worse since you wouldn't exist anymore, and no one would have anyone to blame for the lose of free will (And they couldn't play the blame game anyway, since that requires a little bit of self interest).
Kinda agree with cursed here even if I consider it more a misguided naive move then a dick one.

More worryingly, this could be the single largest silent genocide in the history of the universe, think of all those people who exist in the current timeline suddenly never existing as time rewinds and decisions that led to these people's birth would never have happened.

Death is scary enough as it is, but never having even existed?

By a funny coincidence watched a Dr Who episode last night (flesh and stone with the weeping angels), and some soldiers in it get entranced by a rip in the space time continuum, so the sergeant sends his men to investigate 1 by 1, each time the soldier sent gets absorbed by the tear and is "unmade" so for the other soldiers it is like he never existed and the sergeant kept sending more men, forgetting he sent the previous ones as they never existed. Then it's just the doctors companion (who can remember the previous soldiers due to being speshul) and the sarge, the companion desperately trying to remind the sarge that he sent 4 of his men to die already, whilst the sarge replies "What men? It was always just us 2. Now stay here, I will go to investigate, i'll be back in 2 minutes, i promise..." I found that rather freaky (incidentally first DW episode ever for me ^^ can see why people reccomended that episode so highly) and the fate of those men to be extremely cruel.
 

Daymo

And how much is this Pub Club?
May 18, 2008
694
0
0
NinjaDeathSlap said:
ZephyrFireStrom said:
NinjaDeathSlap said:
ZephyrFireStrom said:
I wouldn't. Humans aren't worth it. Well majority of them anyway, so weak and stupid. They deserve all the suffering they get and then some. Specially rich and famous people and the clones that follow them.
Oh hoo-fucking-ray! The inevitable misanthropic douche is in the house. Nelson Who? Mahatma What? No, every single homo-sapiens on the planet is worth nothing more then their own weight in shit and no one human has ever done anything good for anyone else. That's why I wouldn't give up my own conscious existence to end all human suffering. Not because I value myself too much, not even because I think humans are stronger if we have to overcome ordeals to succeed. I just can't be arsed because I spend too much time in my mum's basement to see any good in the world.

If you hate us so much, then just go away because nobody cares.

OP: I'd do it. If I could end all human suffering the only thing I would need for the rest of eternity is to be able to watch the Utopia my choice created blossom and prosper.
First off, I said majority of humans aren't worth it. Get your facts straight dumbass. There's no good reason to give up my life just so corrupted, indecent, moronic factory clones such as yourself could live happily ever after. Fact is majority of humans lost their ability to overcome actual challenges. And for the record, we don't have basements where I come from. You stupid mindless fucking troll.

Nah, that would only end your suffering sooner. I'd rather go on a massacre and go down in history as an infamous killer. Still more than what you would accomplish.
Oh I'm so sorry. You're right, I should have got my facts straight. It's quite clear to me now that you have in fact met every single human being on Earth and thus been able to pass the completely fair and not at all presumed judgement that the vast majority of us don't have a single ounce of compassion within us. How could I be so moronic as to believe that that was just a completely one-sided impression that you've got from whatever band you happen to be listening to at the moment? I also commend you on your powers of clairvoyance, seem as you obviously can tell despite the fact that I have probably never seen you before that I am a "factory clone" and will never accomplish anything in my life as noteworthy as a mass murder. Now that I think about it, it just seems so clear that I am exactly the same as every single person out on the street, and they in turn are all identical to each other. We might as well all be goose-stepping in perfect rhythm, so what's the point of actually, y'know, getting to know anyone, let alone feeling something as weak and unoriginal as compassion for them when they will only disappoint me. Thank you for opening my eyes as to how futile it all is, excuse me while I go wrap my lips round a shotgun barrel.

(also, I'm sorry I wasn't aware about the fact that your mum doesn't have a basement. What is it then, her attic?)
NinjaDeathSlap, that is possibly the best thing I have read on this site. Also Zephyer, doesn't not sacrifcing yourself make you far worse then these people you hate. I would prefer to be stupid, weak and kind then a unhappy, selfish jackass if it came down to it.

I would definitly sacrifice myself for this. I'm under no illusion that I'll do something memorable anyway, the odds of that are highly unlikely. I'm fine to give up my presence and be content knowing I did good, even if no one else knows about it.
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
Absolutely. Even if I couldn't partake in it, seeing everything going to so well and happily would keep my spirits up. Wouldn't be easy, but it'd be a worthy sacrifice.
 

Sir Prize

New member
Dec 29, 2009
428
0
0
No because as someone else pointed out the whole way to end all human based suffering would be to take away freewill. If someone no longer has the choice between doing good or evil, then it's not excatly morally good because there was never a bad. By wiping out the existance of all things evil the good things become a little less good, because there's no real oppesite to them.

EDIT: Also, there are somethings that lie in a moral grey area so what happens to those?
EDIT 2: Just one more point, wouldn't you have to erase the knowledge of evil or something to that affect?
Or perhaps make the entire world the same, you know so we all agree on everything?
 

Duruznik

New member
Aug 16, 2009
408
0
0
Nope, and I have 2 reasons why:

1. In my opinion, humans are propelled forward by suffering and pain. Our world is flawed, and we strive to improve it. For ourselves, for others, whoever- the point is all we really work for is to improve life. If life were perfect, I'd say that a large part of what it means to be human would disappear. I know that, being an upper-middle calss teen who's never starved before, I'm being kinda hypocritical, but that's my point of view in life.

2. I'm hella selfish. I love life. A lot. It ain't amazing, but I sure as hell am thankful for all I have (I consider myself very, very lucky). I am not giving this up for a philosophically dubious cause.
 

TheAceTheOne

New member
Jul 27, 2010
1,106
0
0
I would.

I'd do it for my friends and family. Even if she couldn't remember me, there's a certain friend of mine, whom I really care about, whom I want to see happy no matter what... If it solved every problem, it'd solve her problems too.

So, yes. I'd gladly give up my entire existence for the people I love.

The random strangers... Well, yes, for them too. But more for people I know, because I have a more personal stake in it.
 

Purkki

New member
Apr 4, 2010
102
0
0
No war, no diseases, no famine -> Overpopulation. So I wouldn't do it. Even when every problem would be erased, there will be new problems which are caused by no problems. Quite paradoxal.
 

Xaio30

New member
Nov 24, 2010
1,120
0
0
I believe someone has watched the Butterfly Effect recently. ;)

Anyways, no. I would not do it. I guess I am too egoistic to sacrifice my own life if no-one even remembers me.
 

subjectseven

New member
Aug 19, 2011
118
0
0
I definitely wouldn't say you're selfish for wanting to keep your own life.

Living as a human where every single person is satisfied would be too strange, and almost too hard to comprehend. There would be nothing to work for. Human emotion, probably the most significant feature of what makes us a unique species, wouldn't exist with the exception of the emotion of happiness. I wouldn't even be able to decide if this change would be for the better or worse unless I experienced it? But then again, of course it's always going to be for the better because I won't be able to feel anything else except satisfaction and happiness.
 

BabySinclair

New member
Apr 15, 2009
934
0
0
Suffering is part of the human existence, it from this that we evolve (culturally speaking.) Without pain and sorrow we will have nothing to strive for and I could not walk forever in this world, able to interact with it or not, knowing that I've ruined the meaning of our existence. (The mean in my opinion is to persevere, we are not the strongest, fastest, or environmentally adapted, we're just the best survivors and that is why we exist, to survive whatever comes our way.)