TehCookie said:
Dexter111 said:
Notice how every non-videogame example you posted probably has sexy men in advertising their products. Old Spice dude for deodorant, athletes for shoes, hot guys shirtless in jeans ads (I tend to notice Levi does that quite often). If I took the time to look I probably could find an attractive guy eat fries or posing for a picture.
So how are any of videogame characters you posted exploited for fanservice? Not that many people oppose sexy women in games, just the way they act. Oh and I'll clarify fanservice as fanservice directed towards the female gamers. If you sexualize men for other men that doesn't help female gamers at all. I find it worse since it's just outright ignoring them.
People like fanservice. I'll admit I like fanservice. I'm not saying we should get rid of it, but we should level the paying field a bit and have fanservice for all!
Well that was pretty much my point, you'll see as many "hot guys" in commercials/movies/tv series/games as you see "hot gals", and I don't really see any kind of exploitation either way, as they aren't being forced to pose or participate in any of it against their free will or against their beliefs, it's a job like many others and it is based on basic biological primal urges to find certain physical traits more attractive than others. I don't see any problem with that, but the people that do seem to often be rather one-sided in comparisons and there's always the ingenious argument that women apparently don't like sexualized/muscular men, but that that is apparently a "male fantasy" or something (I don't want to look like either The Hulk or some girly man-boy prevalent in most JRPGs either), in which case a lot of the commercials you talked about at first would apparently miss their mark xD
Also, more often than not the people complaining actually *do* oppose "sexy" people in games, if it would be only about the characterization, then more often than not it's barely existant in a lot of video games and it isn't restricted to a certain type of character, it's just bad writing in general (or no writing at all, as it's more about the shooting of things).
All that said, I don't really judge how good a game is on either how many "good looking people" there are or usually characterization in general much at all... let's break down my favourite games of this year:
Witcher 2 - it has some erotic scenes and attractive characters but mostly excels through the telling of its story and showing of ambiguous morals supported by some of the best visuals in any video game
L.A. Noire - great character story, although it has its faults in the gameplay department it made that up to me by reminding me of TV series with HBO/Showtime type of quality
Space Pirates and Zombies - surprise of the year, great gameplay as a space sim/shooter and only a bunch of cutscenes with a few still images and text for characterization
Portal 2 - great story and funny characters
Battlefield 3 (Multiplayer) - just military men shooting each other, fun stems from gunplay and using the right tactics at the right time to be able to turn around and win a match
Terraria - no characterization to speak of, fun stems from gameplay
Magicka (CoOp) - barely any characterization at all, more of a parody and fun stems from gameplay
Saint's Row: The Third (CoOp) - the first game that has both exaggerated and sexualized female and male characters with jiggly physics and pokes some good fun out of both, the fun stems mostly from the similarly exaggerated gameplay and activities though
Basically, looking at it I don't much care either way, as long as a game is fun I could aswell play as a representation of a 10 year old (Costume Quest), some sort of weird ant-like creature (Psychonauts) or any sort of critter or individual, but I also don't see a problem with any of them being attractive or having "assets" (Mass Effect 2 for instance), in some cases I even prefer it or it might raise my interest to start with and I've never seen a game be bad or good because of that as an isolated singular reason.