cuddly_tomato said:
Naah. If there was a god who went around fixing everything in sight then human progress would halt overnight. People would become dependant on this god for everything and anything, then start asking the unreasonable before long (please kill my enemies.) Didn't you ever read Gulivers travels? What happened when he helped the little people? He had the best motives, but his actions resulted in the little people demanding more and more from him.
Also remember that chaos, conflict, pain, death, suffering, and danger are all tests. Whether you are atheist, Christian, or Buddhist, you have to admit that those things are what temper life. Think about it - how would life evolve without it? How would people learn how to deal with life if they didn't suffer? And just desirable would a perfect existance be?
All true, of course. Adversity is a major factor in human development, on both microscopic and macroscopic levels.
The question is, then, why he should intervene in anything. A caring parent might allow a child to get a tiny bit too close to a fire so they learn that fire is hot - but letting the kid fall in and burn to death would be indefensible. And yet that's what God allows, if he exists and is omnipotent. Look at the Crusades, the World Wars, the Arab-Israeli conflict, Northern Rock, the cancellation of
Firefly... That's letting the kid fall into the fire. That doesn't temper, that destroys.
A genuinely omnipotent, omniscient and praiseworthy god would know where to draw the line, and no amount of mysterious ways gets him off the hook for that. ;-)
As for 2012, by the way, the Mayans never said anything about it being the end of the world - just the end of an era, rather like we'd celebrate the Millennium (In 2001, of course, because we can count. Or, I suppose, technically 1994, since the year 0 was misaligned...).