Rape is a form of torture - it is designed to break a person, to haunt them. Rape isn't actually about sex for most rapists (according to psych studies done on rapists) - it's about hurting someone for revenge or because "they deserve it" or because the rapist can't hurt the person he (or she) really wants to hurt.
The main exception being date-rape, which is usually about sex (or sometimes humiliation - not that the difference often matters to the victim) but violent rape is almost always about torture. (Of course, the torture can be about getting sexual satisfaction, in a sort of round-about way, but then so can murder... gods, people can be fucked up).
This is why I would consider rape worse than murder - the same way that I would consider burning someone alive worse than shooting them in the head.
Rape is far worse, it CANT be justified and permanently scars the victim psychologically setting it up to what can be a lifetime of suffering
Murder as nasty as it is, ends there, and can be justified due to extrenous circunstances.
ultimately is one of those topics where everybody is right cause is too far rooted in personal opinion (unless some AH comes saying raping is fun and killing is cool)
Rape is worse because it can't be justified
and
Murder is worse because because the victim can never recover
Quite frnakly put me in the Murder boat, rape doesn't even ALWAYS have consequences on the victim anyway, there are people who WANT to raped (not many, but still)...
Edit: to people yet to post, just think for a moment, would you rather be raped or killed? I would personally prefer rape, heck, I'd rather be tortured as long as it left me alive at the end of it.
Murder is generally defined as an unlawful homicide with premeditated malice. Under this definition, it can no more be justified than rape can. As such, I would have to go with murder as being the worse crime, since the wounds it causes can never be healed.
As for which is "worse" for the victim, obviously it's murder. Really, doesn't need to be debated. As for which is the "worse" act e.g is the rapist or the murderer the worse person, that entirely depends on the specific case, there's a bazillion reasons for both and trying to make a blanket statement about all those reasons is impossible.
murder: can be justified; war, they tried to kill someone you care about or you or successfully killed someone you care about, or other reasons i haven't yet thought of.
rape: under no circumstance can this be justified.
in my mind I always connect a "worst case scenario" of rape with torture and you can irreversibly damage someone(and those around them with torture which will always affect more people than murder.
murder: truly affects only those who truly knew the victim.
rape(more directly, torture): I know of methods that are so terrifying that it will make those who never knew the person cringe in pain and have nightmares of the process;
most horror movies demonstrate the concept but more directly the 1 guy 1 jar video, or 3 guys 1 hammer video.
essentially because the review of the incident damages more people than murder, i say rape (or torture which you can do at the same time)
i wanted to say more on this but i forgot mid rant so i'll stop here
please pm me if curious on anything i've said or would like to change my mind(please do help me to change my mind since i honestly scare myself frequently)
Quite frnakly put me in the Murder boat, rape doesn't even ALWAYS have consequences on the victim anyway, there are people who WANT to raped (not many, but still)...
Murder. Rape is certainly a terrible thing...but pretty much only for women. The reason they say 99% of rape victims are females raped by males is because a no male is going to have unwilling sex with a woman after they hit puberty, even if it was "forced" on them.
[small]Obviously I don't really know jack shit about male rape victims, but it seems to make sense out of context so SHADDUP[/small]
Murder is much worse When you stop breathing you cant take meds after rape you still can. Easy one fer me!
Well i'll go into further detail, Murder is as a poster above me mentioned is not in response to being attacked, therefore all Murder is voluntary as is Rape.Both have long lasting after-effects, both on the mental and physical natures of the victim. However at the end one victim is no longer on this earth and the other is. Physiological damage can be mended with time, therapy, and liberal doses of medication ,as mentioned above. And in regards to the assailant, Murderers often have regrets and mental stress about what they have done, Rapists on the other hand only regret getting caught.
After considering this we can draw only one conclusion that is Murder is as regarded as a whole more traumatic to the victim and Kin than Rape.
P.S. I am not belittling the horrible effects of Rape, but look to present both as statistics to be calculated.
I would normally say definitely that rape is the worse of the two. Its a complete taking of power, an absolute mental subversion physically and emotionally scarring to anyone it happens to, there are definite risks to the victim not encountered in any other crime, including but definitely not limited to emotional and psychological torment and damage, relationship trouble, control issues, and potential for social exile or stigma (face it, as advanced as modern societies are, a good number of them don't actually have good ways of dealing with rape victims, advanced or not.)
That being said, there is a certain finality to death that certainly makes murder a great concern. Even if a killing can be justified, there is no denying that for many people it either causes them internal pain or anguish when they have to do it, or the damage was done before they did the deed. And that's for killing, not murder. Murder, or the unjustified and intentional killing of someone (Big hint on the actual definition of the word for people claiming murder can be justified... it goes Manslaughter: accidental killing, Homicide: intentional killing that can possibly be justified, Murder: unjustified Homicide. There, defined.) is a completely different ballgame. And for the victim here, there is no recovery, no second chance. I'll give you another big hint here. There have been cases of people being attacked, and having "died" on the operating table while they were trying to be saved. In those cases, the assailant was not tried for murder, but for attempted murder. For real murder, the victim has to stay dead.
And now, I will say something relevant to this subject that despite any appearances of a joke or light-hearted humor, is 100% serious, and about 80% offensive to 90% of people. For that reason, I have hidden it behind a spoiler.
In a case where both are done by a perpetrator to a victim in the same short time span, I think many would agree that whichever one happened second would be worse.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.