Poll: whose starting WW3 people?

Recommended Videos

Shinomori

New member
Sep 20, 2011
50
0
0
I'm sorry but you're all wrong. WW III will be started by Antarctica vs the Arctic. Polar Bears and Penguins have had a cold war going on for years.
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,544
0
0
There's no gonna be a "world war 3". You want to see a depiction of the most probable form of future warfare? Then check out Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots.

It's mostly gonna be corporate armies fighting the odd insurgent faction or two that dare threaten the capitalistic money-making machine, or perhaps one corporate army engaged in a few skirmishes with another corporate army.

The age of national governments doing any large scale warfare is passing.
 

LinwoodElrich

New member
Dec 1, 2009
35
0
0
Greenland versus Iceland, Iceland will be pissed that Greenland takes all the tourists (being called 'Green' land) and Greenland will be angry because Iceland isn't really freaking cold
 

Darknacht

New member
May 13, 2009
849
0
0
Luxembourg VS. Switzerland
Switzerland will attempt to invade Luxembourg as the first step to eliminating blue from all nations flags, reserving blue only for flags of organizations such as the UN and EU. From there all countries with blue on their flags join Luxembourg and all without join Switzerland.
 

devotedsniper

New member
Dec 28, 2010
752
0
0
Since there was no other, i put America (should really be America and UK since UK follow america everywhere..) and china, but i believe it will be the UK vs Australia after an argument over the ashes (along with the other sports us and the Australian's clash at, rugby is another example).

Many chavs and kangeroo's will be lost in the war.
 

Vanbael

Arctic fox and BACON lover
Jun 13, 2009
626
0
0
Im going with USA Vs. East Europe, and a repulican will be in office when it happens.
That or Canada will sack Turkey using maple syrup and hocky sticks.
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Way recent history has played out, america vs anyone but china.
China would sink the american economy so quickly its daft.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA
Jadak said:
tstorm823 said:
It's not really World War unless more than 2 nations get involved...
Maybe you missed the part where this wasn't asking who would be involved, but who would likely be the ones to go at it first, triggering other nations involvement and starting a world war.
But since there are plenty of wars between two nations that don't lead to world war, wouldn't it be more appropriate to blame those taking sides?
 

Justice4L

New member
Aug 24, 2011
213
0
0
America vs Russia because apparently every video game company in the entire world thinks so.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
tstorm823 said:
Jadak said:
tstorm823 said:
It's not really World War unless more than 2 nations get involved...
Maybe you missed the part where this wasn't asking who would be involved, but who would likely be the ones to go at it first, triggering other nations involvement and starting a world war.
But since there are plenty of wars between two nations that don't lead to world war, wouldn't it be more appropriate to blame those taking sides?
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't matter much because this is a question of cause and effect, where the topic is looking for what might be considered the initial cause, not who should be blamed.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA
Jadak said:
But since there are plenty of wars between two nations that don't lead to world war, wouldn't it be more appropriate to blame those taking sides?
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't matter much because this is a question of cause and effect, where the topic is looking for what might be considered the initial cause, not who should be blamed.[/quote]

It's not hard to point out how limited and presumptuous it is to ask this question and expect only 1 vs 1 answers, but to comtinue pushing this point, I would be a giant troll. teehee
 

darkonnis

New member
Apr 8, 2010
201
0
0
Exile714 said:
I just can't imagine WWIII when the US has nuclear weapons. Sure, there will be small conflicts, but the big ones are forever off the table.

Also, I would have voted for EU versus the Balkan States. Why is the only European country the UK, and why in the world would they start a world war with Argentina? Is that a soccer thing or something?
30 years a go or so, we fought over the Falkland isles. The argentinians to this day want them to be part of their territories because of the oil thats in the ocean there.
Trouble is, the people who live there are happy under colonial rule, and the UK if nothing else, holds its territories if they want to be kept.
It has been hinted at in the past that they'd try again. Makes no odds, we hammered them the first time, can probably do it again.
 

TiloXofXTanto

New member
Aug 18, 2010
490
0
0
There shall be no world war.
There shall only be conquest.

The Prussians shall rise again and steadily conquer the Earth with the backing of their allies.
Soon the Earth shall contain only two nations, the mighty global Prussian republic, and Switzerland.
 

Sir Ollie

The Emperor's Finest
Jan 14, 2009
2,022
0
41
Mcdonalds vs KFC.

 

Quigglebert

New member
Apr 13, 2011
81
0
0
LordOfInsanity said:
I'm going to go with Israel and Palestine when/if they get a state. Think of it. The Palestinians get a state, the leadership does their annual rocket launch into Israel
snip
isnt that like the 5th of november in the UK

that aside, i reckon it'll be china or russia that get arsey with some of their neighbors and america will decide it concerns them for some unapparent reason, escalating the vietnam way with advisors sent in to train ground forces.
in some respects it happening already, especially in twain where the us have just retro fitted most of the airforce their to bring them above the combat capabilities of their chinese counter parts. look further back when we have america trying to set up a balistic missile shield in europe and russia throwing their dummy out of the pram
 

Mr.PlanetEater

New member
May 17, 2009
730
0
0
It'll start off small, you know like Canada discontinuing the RCMP. Which will lead to the Sasquatches overrunning most of Canada by mid-July, at which point we'll either have to evacuate to Mexico or South America to save ourselves from the Sasquatch hoard. No doubt this will cause great tensions and small conflicts will spark as people try to get across the border and deal with drug cartels. To make matters worse a couple of internet geeks with too much free time will come up with a brilliant scheme to put bullet proof vests on the bears of North America and Europe. And because America has wasted all of their armor piercing rounds on the Sasquatches and Drug cartels, and European police forces don't even have armor piercing rounds. So now we will be faced with invincible bears who will no doubt be raping churches and burning the women. Finally it'll all boil over when Russia accidentally releases their Yeti's from Siberia.

I pray to God every night that Canada keeps the RCMP.