Poll: whose starting WW3 people?

Recommended Videos

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
I would go with North Korea v. South Korea. North Korea is such a background country and they need to stop with the whole isolating themselves from the world and learn to open up to everyone.
 

Icetailgreg

New member
Oct 12, 2011
25
0
0
In my opinion, America, with all of its games about Russia invading them (Except for Homefront, but, really, it may as well have been), will get paranoid as all hell (Like me in a dark room) and just go and invade Russia. By then, most of the good soldiers will be dead or retired and the fate of the free, gluttonous country that is America will rest on hardcore CoD players. Can't wait to see the Russians talk about this!
Russian Soldier 1: (In russian, duh) You won't believe what I saw today!
RS2: What?
RS1: An American soldier tried to shoot, while jumping! When he missed, he said something, That my English speaking comrade translated as "Stupid gun! This would never happen in "Call Of Duty.". We then took him as a prisoner.
RS2: Haha! and they say we Russians are backwards!

Mind you, the convo wouln't go that way, butyou get the point.

Edit: since I'm new here, and not used this new forum, if anybody finds this offensive (Just message me if you think this) I will delete this.
 

Mr_Universal

New member
Jun 29, 2009
186
0
0
Where is the option for an Alien invasion against America? (because we all know they will go for the yanks first,that´s one thing movies have tought me)
 

vrbtny

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2009
1,959
0
41
The UK vs Argentina?.... I don't comprehend.

That war over the little sheep isles happened over 20 years ago. Even we English don't keep grudges that long.
 

cookyy2k

Senior Member
Aug 14, 2009
799
0
21
Dome of the rock. The site is considered holy to Muslims, Jews and Christians. At the moment there is the Muslim temple on the sight, some Israeli Jews and several evangelical churches in america want it torn down so they can go digging since the arc of the covenant is supposable buried under there. I have a feeling one day some Israeli group will attempt to destroy the temple, if they succeed then I have a feeling the Muslim nations will turn on Israel HARD which will involve America and so on escalating to WW3.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
America versus South Korea? What? Reading comprehension? What's that?

I think it'll be Israel vs. Everyone Else. They have some allies, but they have an inexplicable amount of hate aimed at them as well.
 

Magicmad5511

New member
May 26, 2011
637
0
0
I WILL. Get me a space laser, a large amount of funding and a country flag of your choice and I'll get it done. I'll even do it against the country of your choice.

OT:
OK. In all seriousness I actually think America will be the cause in some way or another. Not sure who the other side will be to start with but I'll blame America.
They're at war already.They are really defensive of their religion.
I think it's a powder keg waiting to be lit.
 

cookyy2k

Senior Member
Aug 14, 2009
799
0
21
lacktheknack said:
America versus South Korea? What?

I think it'll be Israel vs. Everyone Else. They have some allies, but they have an inexplicable amount of hate aimed at them as well.
Not really inexplicable is it? It was made from stolen land at the end of world war 2, and since then they've broken most every rule the UN has but the US keep bailing them out veto style. They forge UK passports to conduct killings around the world, they invade sovereign nations with no reason then just retreat, they claim half the middle east as theirs by divine mandate. I can see why they are slightly disliked.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
cookyy2k said:
lacktheknack said:
America versus South Korea? What?

I think it'll be Israel vs. Everyone Else. They have some allies, but they have an inexplicable amount of hate aimed at them as well.
Not really inexplicable is it? It was made from stolen land at the end of world war 2, and since then they've broken most every rule the UN has but the US keep bailing them out veto style. They forge UK passports to conduct killings around the world, they invade sovereign nations with no reason then just retreat, they claim half the middle east as theirs by divine mandate. I can see why they are slightly disliked.
I'm NOT getting into a war for Israel here, but they didn't just steal the land. The UN offered it to them. And the alternative was expelling hundreds of thousands of Jews from Palestine, as opposed to hundreds of thousands of Arabs. It's called a "lose lose scenario".

As for the rest... sounds like pretty much any other major country with allies. The only difference is that Israel is the most recent to declare a country as their own and screwing a bunch of others out of land and then abusing it for a while.

See the birth of America for comparison.
 

Vault Citizen

New member
May 8, 2008
1,703
0
0
Do4600 said:
I don't think WW III will start because we're too interconnected and our populations depend too heavily on each other.
Actually at the time of WWI the economies in Europe all had close links and were all to some extent inter reliant on each other, yet that didn't stop the war from happening.
 

cookyy2k

Senior Member
Aug 14, 2009
799
0
21
World war 3 will not begin between nuclear powers. The concept of MAD keeps the peace well in that regard. It is far likely to be industrialising nations much like the last 2, the only difference now is that a nuclear power can become involved down the line and that's more of an issue.
 

Vakz

Crafting Stars
Nov 22, 2010
603
0
0
Andy Shandy said:
Berethond said:
Luxembourg vs. Andorra

I have a feeling it'll start small.
I say smaller. Vatican City vs Monaco. My guess is the Pope starts wrecking Monaco's shit, and from there it escalates into one mass-world brawl.
Vatican City vs Monaco, but guessing reason will be Albert II stealing the pop's hat during a party. You know how it goes.. people always want to try out the hat (cause it's so tall, you know?), it gets passed around, and then suddenly, no one knows where it is, because Albert went outside an put it in his car when no one was looking. That guy is always up to no good.

I'd start a war over that. It's a pretty neat hat.
 

Do4600

New member
Oct 16, 2007
934
0
0
Vault Citizen said:
Do4600 said:
I don't think WW III will start because we're too interconnected and our populations depend too heavily on each other.
Actually at the time of WWI the economies in Europe all had close links and were all to some extent inter reliant on each other, yet that didn't stop the war from happening.
The world population has more than tripled since 1917 and with it the need for resources, I really don't think we have as much wiggle room in our economics and resource transfers as we did back in 1917.
 

Vault Citizen

New member
May 8, 2008
1,703
0
0
Do4600 said:
Vault Citizen said:
Do4600 said:
I don't think WW III will start because we're too interconnected and our populations depend too heavily on each other.
Actually at the time of WWI the economies in Europe all had close links and were all to some extent inter reliant on each other, yet that didn't stop the war from happening.
The world population has more than tripled since 1917 and with it the need for resources, I really don't think we have as much wiggle room in our economics and resource transfers as we did back in 1914.
You seem to have been mistaken about when WWI started so I fixed it for you (unless you did mean when America entered the war and didn't just think that it actually started then also, in which case my apologies)
 

dancinginfernal

New member
Sep 5, 2009
1,871
0
0
King_1 said:
What a stupid thread.
No one will start WW3 because of the existence of nuclear missiles.
This statement is fact. The wars of the modern age are wars of deterrence. Nobody wants to start an all-out war with someone at risk of triggering a global nuclear battle. Such an event would destroy Earth's atmosphere, and scar modern culture and society.
 

AlphaEcho

New member
Jun 16, 2010
228
0
0
thespyisdead said:
i said america vs china, but in reality it should be the other way around, because chine will some day get pissed about the american "fuck that" attitude toward it's 100 trillion dollar loan.
What? China is even more reliant on the US than vice versa.

None of these are plausible, it will not happen. The republicans wet dream is defunct.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,872
0
0
Dooblet said:
Where is the option for Germany vs. Something random? I just have this feeling that Germany will be involved
Nah. Over the past hundred years, we've only known Germany to be a wholly peaceful and loving nation. [/sarcasm]

But yeah, I agree with this guy. I'd say Germany will get pissed off at someone not paying them back their money (perhaps us Irish), and will ragequit the EU, then invade us because we didn't pay them, then someone will try to step in and help, and then all hell shall break loose.