Poll: whose starting WW3 people?

Recommended Videos

Custard_Angel

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,236
0
0
Middle East vs. Israel.

Especially with the current government reshuffle that has been going on in a lot of those countries, I can see some huge problems occurring in the future.

America and a few other countries (probably the UK, Australia etc.) will join Israel, passive governments (Scandinavia, France, Germany etc.) will condemn them etc.

Bad stuff will happen.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
Pakistan v India. They have fought 4 wars since 1947 and as recently as 2002 they have been on the verge of war. The likely story goes something like this. A Pakistan backed Islamic terrorist organization launches series of large scale attacks in India. Indian public opinion swings in favour of large scale military action. India launches 300000 troops across the border, Pakistan appeals to its ally China. China worried that Indian success could mean, not only their main rival for global economic dominance gets stronger but their own territorial gains made during the 1962 Chinese invasion of India come under threat. China begins moving troops towards the border. India seeing the threats uses her navy to block oil supplies going to China from the middle east. China finding its oil supply blockaded but with 1/2 million troops a few hours drive from the central Asian oil fields, mainly controlled by India's ally Russia. Now you have 2 minor nuclear powers and 2 major nuclear powers shooting at each in very quick space of time.
 

Enslave_All_Elves

New member
Mar 31, 2011
113
0
0
Exile714 said:
I just can't imagine WWIII when the US has nuclear weapons. Sure, there will be small conflicts, but the big ones are forever off the table.

Also, I would have voted for EU versus the Balkan States. Why is the only European country the UK, and why in the world would they start a world war with Argentina? Is that a soccer thing or something?
You're worried about us? Have you seen the other people with nukes? Apart from France they're a pretty unsavory and aggressive lot.

The notion that there will never be another big war is too hopeful. There is always another brewing and it's always worse than the last.

"Oh it'll be economic or political and that's it."

...Uhhhh what did you think the other wars were? Fun vacations for rowdy young men? Economics and politics always cause one group or another to butt heads eventually, and then they call their friends for help and it all becomes a Wild West Saloon minus a piano player.

I'd have to guess it would be in the Middle East, and the US would get drawn into the mess. I don't think it would be America vs. China. Sometimes I wonder, even hope (yeah sick I know) for that, but I think we're too involved economically. I believe China's biggest threat is going to come from their own pissed off people. If anything they might even end up on our side. Russia? Mmmmmmm maybe. Probably end up with whoever can benefit them the most one way or the other.

I'd have to guess it would be Israel vs. Someone, or Pakistan vs. someone then the US gets involved.
 

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
The UK against Argentina. We REALLY like that little island, just in case anyone had any ideas.
 

SFMB

New member
May 13, 2009
218
0
0
Satsuki666 said:
SFMB said:
WW3 will start in Africa, when two tribes grow too big and start to assimilate smaller ones. War will sweep across the continent, millions dead and raped. Nobody in the civilized world gives a shit, just contain it in Africa.
So wait how is that any different to what has been happening in Africa for the past only god knows how many years?
It isn't. Have you noticed the World War yet? Let them sort it out themselves.
 

XDravond

Something something....
Mar 30, 2011
356
0
0
WW3 ehm not sure who would start it but USA, China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran and most of Africa (and of course EU has to be involved but the "unification" is not that stable at the moment) sure will be involved... And betting Americans will be playing really hard on the "we're the good guys" card...
But for the voting 3) America vs the world... (rest of world will be fighting against each other to... )

I have a hard time seeing many more countries starting a big ass honestly ugly fight of world scale proportions...

But what says really that say Iceland wouldn't start a war? (they do not have an army but still..)
 

6unn3r

New member
Aug 12, 2008
567
0
0
Ohhh i dunno lets saaaaaaay, Papua New Guinea aaaaaaaand Cayman Brac?

Meh. I dont think there will be one, M.A.D pretty much means that we're all fucked if there is.

And then to quote Einstein
I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth?rocks!
 

Zach of Fables

New member
Oct 5, 2011
126
0
0
I don't see a true World War actually happening. But because America and China are the two superpowers, they would have to be involved in some way.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,150
0
0
tstorm823 said:
It's not really World War unless more than 2 nations get involved...
Yes, but these things tend to start, and other countries pick sides.

OT: Northern Ireland vs. the rest of the UK. Either that, or the Yorkshiremen vs. the Lancastrians. We hate each other so much...
 

Robert Ewing

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,977
0
0
I'd put money on either North Korea or China.

North Korea, because they're crazy. But WW3 should not sound threatening in this case. South Korea would completely wipe the floor with North Korea's ass by the time any other country has even got the chance to get their aircraft carriers wet.

China because... Well it's China. They're scary as shit. But they do depend HEAVILY on the US, UK, lots of other western countries for almost all their economy, so I dunno.
 

TonyVonTonyus

New member
Dec 4, 2010
829
0
0
China will demand Russian natural resources, they'll refuse, they'll go to war, Russia will be overthrown by ultranationalists or communists in a revolution, ban together with china to take over the world or just try it on their own...or like I'm hoping for Canada and Denmark.
 

vivalahelvig

New member
Jun 4, 2009
513
0
0
TheYellowCellPhone said:
I don't know, therefore aliens.

No reason WW3 can also be the War of the Worlds.
When you think about it, we could just send out a few biological bombs and murder them all, like in the book, but a lot quicker and more exciting to watch from a hill in some area in britain.

Captcha: Behold, ibleivel
I do beleive this will happen too, captcha!
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
New Guinea vs Puerto Rico...WHAT THE F-

My browser doesn't know the name "Puerto"?
Well...time to rectify that.

I had some silly joke about how the Great Rum Shortage brought these two countries to war...but now I've just lost my train of thought at that revelation.

In all seriousness: Possibly North Korea vs South Korea; we've seen far more bloody and violent wars break out in the Middle East since WW2 than anything today. The only way that shit is going to get serious is if some terrorist cell nukes a major city and manage to drag one of the big Arabic players into the mess as a scapegoat....cripes, did I just accidentally write a Tom Clancy novel there? I'm sorry.

Anyway, China has assets in North Korea, and I shouldn't have to explain how in deep South Korea is with the US government. Shit will get hot very quickly if North Korea manages to do something really REALLY stupid, like nuking Japan or South Korea.