You know the fact that you are able to still say everyone else has fun with it and know even though you're gonna miss out makes me respect your personal boycott. Nicely done.Jumplion said:Since it had the option, I will not be buying Black Ops, and I will tell you why.
I will not be buying Black Ops because Activision is publishing it, and the CEO of Activision is Robert "Bobby" Kotick. I do not wish to support that man with my money, even if it's only a paltry $60 compared to the million's he'll make off of everyone else. As a result, I am pretty much "boycotting" Activision, I guess you could say. I will not buy any of their products until either Kotick is removed or cleans up his act. This may result in me missing out on some great experiences, but that's my loss.
However, I do understand that other people are very excited for the game, a few of my friends included. I wish no ill towards you all for wanting to buy Black Ops, it genuinely looks like a nifty game. There is absolutely no reason why you guys shouldn't get the best bang for your buck.
And so, with this, I wish all of you who are purchasing Black Ops a good game. I, personally, will not be purchasing it for my own reasons and you will be purchasing it for your own, and that is perfectly fine. I'll probably play the game with my friend, split-screen and whatnot, or borrow it if he gets it for PS3.
Enjoy your game. I mean that in the most sincere way I can.
I respect that decision because I personally thought World at War was a Catastrophe, but in general the game is going to be much more balanced. They really did their homework in terms of Balance issues, and said there main priority was to tackle in glitches and exploits that first came out in the game.JakeTheSnakeMan said:I'm not buying it. I've never really been into Call of Duty much and MW2 really left a bad taste in my mouth. The campaign was short and the multiplayer fundamentally broken. I know Black Ops is being developed by Treyarch but lets face it. They're not going to be much different.
Sooooo you completely hate the entire series just because enemies come out of invisible walls?Spy_Guy said:Will not get it.
Treyarch has with WaW proven that they're only good for releasing a horrible, broken mess of a game. Yes, WaW was cool, but they forgot rule #1 of immersion.
No invisible walls in open fucking doorways!
Well, yes, you have an enemy spawn in there... but that house surely could provide some much-needed cover from grenades nd bullets and the like.
Shoddy game design like that... no... never. WaW does clearly top my list of "stuff I deeply regret paying for".
As such, why on earth would I entrust them with more of my money?
First, I just have to point out that it's ironic you're getting rid of medal of honour while your avatar is a picture of Danger Close...second...is anybody else scratching their heads about the two men sharing the umbrella?Kukakkau said:I don't fall into any real category there - mainly to play with my friends list, rebalancing and of course zombies.
Plus I was getting rid of medal of honour so had the money back to spend