God dammit, that is disgusting.
If a man did this he'd be called a creep and a pervert and would be in jail for years (and rightly so). But of course because it's a woman "she was just a little emotional and concerned for her baby because motherhood and feelings and hormones" or some shit. I'm just going to stop this train here because I don't really think this is fully a gender thing and I don't want this to turn into a feminism vs MRAs thread. But I won't deny that I think is incredibly sexist on the part of the justice system.
"Suspicion" that someone is a sex offender is not enough. Even if it was factually true that he had molested her toddler, she should have called the police. I don't really see this quite as much of a gender thing but rather I think it's the knee-jerk way people flip out when you say "suspicion" and "child molestation", abandon all reason, and suddenly think literally any and all acts of violence against a person become okay. But the kid DIDN'T molest her infant, and she had no good reason to think that, and even if he did, then this is vigilante justice.
No, this isn't a mother looking out for her child. She got high, and since marijuana doesn't to my knowledge cause violent paranoia I suspect it was on something quite a bit harder, she ganged up on her daughter's boyfriend with 3 accomplices, locked him in a trailer, tortured him for 3 hours, and mutilated his genitals, because of a completely baseless suspicion that the kid was abusing her toddler.
If a man did this he'd be called a creep and a pervert and would be in jail for years (and rightly so). But of course because it's a woman "she was just a little emotional and concerned for her baby because motherhood and feelings and hormones" or some shit. I'm just going to stop this train here because I don't really think this is fully a gender thing and I don't want this to turn into a feminism vs MRAs thread. But I won't deny that I think is incredibly sexist on the part of the justice system.
"Suspicion" that someone is a sex offender is not enough. Even if it was factually true that he had molested her toddler, she should have called the police. I don't really see this quite as much of a gender thing but rather I think it's the knee-jerk way people flip out when you say "suspicion" and "child molestation", abandon all reason, and suddenly think literally any and all acts of violence against a person become okay. But the kid DIDN'T molest her infant, and she had no good reason to think that, and even if he did, then this is vigilante justice.
No, this isn't a mother looking out for her child. She got high, and since marijuana doesn't to my knowledge cause violent paranoia I suspect it was on something quite a bit harder, she ganged up on her daughter's boyfriend with 3 accomplices, locked him in a trailer, tortured him for 3 hours, and mutilated his genitals, because of a completely baseless suspicion that the kid was abusing her toddler.
Well, I guess in that case that's his decision. I personally, I would have demanded she be locked up, or at least lose custody of her children, being a violent drug addict. Or at least have taken it to civil court and sued for pain and suffering.The victim didn't seek jail time so long as Vela acknowledge her crime.