Gormourn said:
plastic_window said:
These are the main parts that concern me.
I mean, I'm all for progress - and since sex is a big buisness, it seems appropriate that robotics should at some point address the most basic of all human wants.
But I don't think it's healthy for a human being to be attatched to a sex-robot emotionally. In some ways I can see why a person might turn to something like this, but we're not exactly good enough with robots to replicate Blade Runner.
Right now, I don't mind these things existing, but I find the idea of someone emotionally connecting to a machine a little disturbing.
People emotionally connect to simple unliving objects. To imaginary concepts. To fuckin' unintelligent animals.
Now do tell me, if it's such a horrible thing, how is it any worse then what I've already said?
I don't believe I ever stated that it was 'such a horrible thing'. Saying that I find something disturbing is a matter of my own morality, and I fail to see why that should annoy you. It's not like I'm throwing eggs at abortion clinics, here.
Although you do bring up a good point, I'd argue that an emotional attatchment to any of those things is basically unhealthy. Concepts, dogs, cats, robots, pieces of the Berlin Wall: none of these things can really return to you the emotion that you give to them.
True, in some cases the emotion is purely platonic, and in these cases I'd argue that there is nothing 'horrible' to be seen. But in the cases where people become genuinely infatuated with something that cannot feel the same way, I'd argue that this relationship is unhealthy.