If I really would do anything, and not be just cannon fodder, then yes. Of course, if there's something more to defend than just land and empty houses, where noone lives anyway.
Not for the country itself, nor would I kill for it. People are always more important than the arbitrary chunks of land they inhabit. After all, once someone's dead, they can never be more than a memory.
The people in it? Maybe. It would be the right thing to do if by dying you might save many, but it's easy to SAY you would without actually being in that situation.
Die for the UK? Eheheheheh. No, being killed in some godforsaken craphole of a desert thousands of miles from home for a pointless cause which no-one cares about any more is not my idea of a particularly worthwhile end.
Die to help defend my town and the people in it? Yes. I'd feel terribly guilty expecting everyone else to fight while I run away without a glance back. If it came to it then I'd fight and die alongside them.
I will never kill another human being in defense. I will only kill if I'm the aggressor. And since I'm not able to delude myself into thinking I'm invincible, that is the only situation in which I would be able to internalize and justify the possibility that I could die.
Nah, I'm just kidding. I'd probably lay out for the heartland. After all, dying for your country is relatively easy compared to killing for it--you're far more likely to do the former anyway.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.