Poll: Would you harbor a nazi?

Recommended Videos

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
dyre said:
Arsen said:
rutger5000 said:
Arsen said:
Sorry to say but that's extremly racist
I said forgive the man, with a historically Jewish God, a Jewish Savior, with a mixed ancestry that would have been looked down upon for being not being of a certain descent, and you have the right to claim I am racist?

This is the foolishness I just spoke of. So many sides are given the full right to use what is and isn't racism, yet in this case the Germans are not by any stretch of the imagination. Even then, the constant reoccuring imagery and force-fed notions that it was worse because it was done to the "Chosen People" could be seen as racist as well.
What the hell are you talking about, dude. We're not talking about prosecuting random Germans, we're talking about prosecuting a Nazi that committed crimes against humanity. Unless you think Jews don't count as a part of humanity, in which case you're a racist. And racism is bad, no matter who spouts it.
Sorry, you've made yourself look foolish.

Are you really claiming jews are a race?
 

klakkat

New member
May 24, 2008
825
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
((snip snip))

Not really. A lot of propaganda remaining from World War I era was still around, and America did curb civil rights to ensure no war weary people would rebel. Raids on foreigners, etc. That was racist. It found no evidence of anything, and it's being repeated again today against Muslims, anyone who looks middle eastern, or Hispanic. Hell, even politicians today and in recent times have viewed these populations as dangerous.

Whether the Jews influenced anything is up for debate. Hell, Americans now believe they defeated Germany when it was really the Russians. Americans taking credit for Russia's actions is kinda low. He is right about a lot of bullshit about World War II being flung around. A lot of American textbooks come from Texas, who tends to make questionable judgments. Evolution? Science? All of that is cut, and some facts were "stretched." Hell i seen a textbook claim that America exported everything in amounts larger than all the other countries, and how everything is "made in America." What a load of crap that was. Movies and culture? They tend to exaggerate, and vilify anything based on pop culture and not facts. Culture itself isn't much better. The culture goes against fact. It basically pushes twisted ideas regardless of fact. Circumcision, pot, etc are all apart of this. People believed circumcision was invented because "God wanted it so" or "because we found it was cleaner." However, in christian beliefs god would not ask us to fix his mistakes because god doesn't make mistakes, and how his designs are perfect. Cutting would be tantamount to questioning god. The cleanliness portion was unfounded, as baths were common. The main reason was to oppress male sexual feeling to prevent masturbation. Pot was pushed as a drug that would make all these bad things happen to you. Sure pot can cause problems, like everything else, but it won't instantly kill you, make you gay, or a terrorist.

In short, America relies on inaccurate culture and ancient propaganda for its information while the education system can't do anything until a massive overhaul is done. Hell, the mistakes we made in World War I & II are showing up again in our modern world due to this knowledge discrepancy.
Surprisingly well put. A lot of people forget that much of modern society relies on technology either developed BY the nazis, or developed to FIGHT the nazis. But that's just the technological aspect; there was intense propaganda surrounding the second world war (the Sequel to the War to End All War; god even Hollywood didn't come up with a sequel THAT shitty). Like what? Oh, that's right, the USA started Eugenics project DECADES before Hitler. And that's not even scratching the surface. Hitler was a folk-hero in Germany because of how oppressed the Germans were after WWI. Long story short, Germany lost WWI, and America basically helped by hammering the last nail in the coffin that German was already laying in. So, a stupid set up of alliances led to a massive war that settled nothing, and the coalition that won decided it would be fair to punish the SHIT out of the losers, despite the fact that they hadn't instigated the war. Germany goes into an economic depression of epic proportions (it makes our Great Depression look like a Bad Hair Day) and is essentially leaderless, their military completely neutered, they have lost all international power and pride. So really, what the fuck did they think would happen? They treat an entire country that is renowned for it's military as a bunch of whipped losers, then raid their meager treasury, and THEN destroy what little remains of their economy, and just expect them to bend over and take it? I say the Nazis were exactly what this world deserved.

Sure, the Nazis were MASSIVE assholes on a scale we hadn't imagined. But they NEVER WOULD HAVE EXISTED if Germany didn't get totally fucked by the peace treaties that ended WWI. Everybody likes to paint them as evil, while conveniently forgetting that we made them that way. The Nazis acted largely in desperation; they, as a nation, had NOTHING to lose. The rest of the world made sure of that. If history has taught us nothing else, it has taught this: the most dangerous thing is a person that hates you and has NO reason NOT to attack. That was the exact position Germany was left in in the 1930's. We were only painted as the glorious saviors because the fiction is so much more fun to read that the truth. I'm not saying the nazi's were right; they were desperate, and desperation creates stupidity. With nothing to lose, they triggered the war that was waiting to explode, and 50 million people died for nothing (I try to contemplate Infinity on a daily basis, and 50 million individuals, 50 million people LIKE ME is a hard concept to wrap my head around).

So is our nation wrong? no. There is no such thing as elemental right and wrong. Morality is decided by the individual. Are the textbooks wrong? Technically, no. Are they misleading? FUCK YES.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
Evidencebased said:
If this person is truly sorry for what they've done, shouldn't they turn themselves in? I'd be pretty dubious that someone was actually "sorry" if they were still hiding out from the police. I'd turn him or her in. They can put their money where their mouth is ... and do it in court.
Agreed. I wouldn't trust a repentant man who's been hiding for so long. Also why would I hide him? If he's survived for this long he knows how to hide himself. Yeah, crimes too great to be forgiven with a promise that they regret all of it, also rising to an officer takes work, meaning he worked to get where he was, so that means he deserves to go wherever he goes for that "work".
 

iblis666

New member
Sep 8, 2008
1,106
0
0
Drake_Dercon said:
READ BEFORE VOTING!

You live in a small town. In it, there is a man.

He is a generous man, kind to all and very into philanthropy. He is by any definition a good neighbour and friend.

One day he asks you to house him for a while. He tells you he was an officer in a concentration camp. He cries for a long time. He is very sorry for what he's done (which happens to be a lot). He knows he will never be able to fix what he has done, but is afraid of what will happen to him if he is incarcerated.

Police soon come to your door asking for him. What do you do?

I was talking about something similar with my english teacher. We are both very convinced that rehabilitation is the best solution to crime, but for very severe crimes there is an instant desire to make someone pay. Usually harshly. This is that internal debate at its logical extreme.

Edit: Crimes against humanity, in case you were wondering.
first off rehabilitation doesnt work, the only way for a criminal to get back on the strait and narrow is if they truly want to be there

that being said there are some crimes that are so big that not only should we not waste the time trying to rehabilitate them we shouldnt even waste the time keeping them in prison but should be executed on the spot after a fair trial

now this person that is so sorry and repentant for what he has done has admitted to causing a great deal of damage so much in fact that it he has caused literally crimes against humanity and as such is on a totally different scale than your run of the mill murderer

If i had him in front of me id probably shoot him on the spot even without a trial
 

Coop83

New member
Mar 20, 2010
141
0
0
Let's face it, any high ranking Nazi is probably so frail nowadays that he is likely to be in a home, or more likely dead. If it were from a more modern conflict, I think that I'd still turn them in, since they had enough conscience to confess to you - the worst they can do is serve out their remaining days in the hands of the authorities, to show that they regret what they do as some sort of gesture of repentance.
 

idodo35

New member
Jun 3, 2010
1,629
0
0
Gordon_4 said:
idodo35 said:
Arsen said:
You want to know what I would do?

Absolute fucking nothing.

Even if he wasn't sorry for what he did...I refuse to turn in this man. Hollywood, Israel, and the Jewish people have villianized these people just for the sole sake that their ancestors were killed and it makes me sick.

Has the man apologized to God? Has he confessed his sins to Him alone? Has he said "God, Jesus...forgive me?". Even then, what right are you to judge in the midst of warfare?

Guess what world? The instance he does that...all the tears have been WIPED away...

We allow black people leniency on a sociological level towards crimes in the United States because of "historical discrimination and inequality", we allow the Mexicans to walk onto land which they take resources from because they are "starving" and "can't maintain anything in their own land", we make up excuses left and right for everyone to lay claim that Israel has a right to Palestinian land for a racial ideology that is insultingly masqueraded as a religion...but nooooo...the German people have absolutely no right whatsoever to ever lay the claim that they had their land usurped by foreign powers and that their country is in actuality BLAMELESS for what happened.

The man is innocent until death in my eyes.

It's only because we've been force-fed that image so many times in our lives, via movies, via war films, via Hollywood...that we actually believe this shit that we're often told. Was it bad? Yes. But it's been overstated as to how "horrible" it really was. I see their deaths as no different than the deaths of soldiers.

Signed.
A man with German ancestry and other "untermenscht" mixings.
two things
1. the two commits about afro americans and mexicans are realy out of place and racist
the one about israel thats a tough one im myself an israely and i dont like what our goverment and "rigt" (as in left and rigt not correct)pollititions do to the arabs lets just put that one a side for a moment

2. what are you talking about demonising? you dont have to demonise a demon those nazis of ww2 were monsters they butcherd 6 million jews just for not being part of the arian race (look it up if you dont know) theyr next targets were black people homosexuals everyone who wasnt part of the "supirior race" was pllaned to be wiped out eventualy the jews were just the first and easyest to kill!
you say that movies and hollywood and everyone are demonising the nazies and yes sometimes they are but the nazis of ww2 (not the old men they became who are sorry for theyr crimes like the one in question) were indeed demons and if you dont belive me search the net for a "josef mengele" also known as the angel of death and tell me this man is inossent and yes this is the worst this gets but belive me the nazis were all evil back then and no one is making that up...
I hate to rain on your parade, but the Jews weren't the only groups of people sent to death by Nazi Germany. They also put to the sword; homosexuals, mentally ill, Gypsy/Roma, political dissidents (party member or no), and basically anyone the S.S. didn't like. All in all, death toll (of the Nazi camps) was about 13 million last I checked. It's also worth noting that Stalin then proceeded to, completely unchecked by the Allies, make Hitler look like a rank amateur in the genocide department.

And what makes a Nazi a Nazi? I seriously doubt some young pup, spurred on by the propaganda of his nation, joins the army and goes to fight for his country as a tank operator is a Nazi, he's just a young idiot with dreams of glory in battle. By now most of the truly evil people, the genuine died in the wool Nazi's who I'd be happy to swinging from a tree doing a last breath quick step, are long dead and good riddance to them.

I have no idea, what I'd do. Guards and officers at the concentration camps are the most difficult of all people to judge: some stayed because it was their duty (no matter how balls out wrong it seems), others because they enjoyed it (see: Aemon Goth) and some because they were terrified of being killed, their families killed and replaced by someone worse.

I don't know, I really am at a loss to answer this question.
i noted in my post that there were outher victims but the jews were just the most and the first (6 million out of 13 million dead were jews)

a nazi as you said isnt the "young pup" because you can see those today in every country (not so much in israel cause we have no choise but joining the army) and yes most evil people are dead some even paid for theyr crimes (for example hitlers helper aichman was the only person ever to recive death penalty in israel)

and about the nazi in question i already answered that this guy just want forgivness and should get it cause he is sorry for what he did and he is just an old guy now seeking rest.
 
Jun 7, 2010
1,257
0
0
If he truly regretted it and had become a good person, I'd help him.

What exactly did he do though?, Did he actually gas people?, Throw them into the furnaces, What?
 

idodo35

New member
Jun 3, 2010
1,629
0
0
dogstile said:
dyre said:
Arsen said:
rutger5000 said:
Arsen said:
Sorry to say but that's extremly racist
I said forgive the man, with a historically Jewish God, a Jewish Savior, with a mixed ancestry that would have been looked down upon for being not being of a certain descent, and you have the right to claim I am racist?

This is the foolishness I just spoke of. So many sides are given the full right to use what is and isn't racism, yet in this case the Germans are not by any stretch of the imagination. Even then, the constant reoccuring imagery and force-fed notions that it was worse because it was done to the "Chosen People" could be seen as racist as well.
What the hell are you talking about, dude. We're not talking about prosecuting random Germans, we're talking about prosecuting a Nazi that committed crimes against humanity. Unless you think Jews don't count as a part of humanity, in which case you're a racist. And racism is bad, no matter who spouts it.
Sorry, you've made yourself look foolish.

Are you really claiming jews are a race?
we are an etnicity for and a nation a race? it depands how you look at it if "black" or "chinease" is a race so id jewish...

and Arsen your racist because the black people and mexicans ruining america bullsh!t you wrote nothing else...
 

Scout Tactical

New member
Jun 23, 2010
404
0
0
No, not because I think the "crimes are too great". In fact, I'm inclined to think they've changed. However, I'm a law-abiding citizen. I do as the law says and assist the police.

Lawful Neutral. All there is to it.
 

duncants

New member
Dec 11, 2010
22
0
0
Never posted anything before, mostly my opinions have already been voiced a hundred times before on a topic , in this thread it's only been like ten times so here it goes.

Most importantly I think it should be realized that (almost) everyone would have done the same thing if they had been unfortunate enough to be a white male in the Third Reich. Even though you may have convinced yourself that you are different.

Statistically speaking however, it seems unlikely that everyone that screams for 'justice' to be served would actually act courageously like killing themselves or something. I agree that 'just following orders' is no excuse but, just staying alive kinda is.

Also I would like someone to explain to me why exactly 'justice' should be served. It is not bringing back any of the old mans victims, the only reason to lock someone away (in my opinion ofc.) is to prevent them from harming someone else and since a 90 year old ex nazi is not going to hurt anyone anymore there seems no point.

ps. history is written by the victorious, someone could convict some European and American officers with as much justification as this dude.

oh and I do realize that if you were something else then a white male in the Third Reich you would be even more unlucky..
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
I'd turn him in, I have faith in the justice system and even with their bias they would be a better judge of whether he was blameless or not than me.
 

MasterWhatever

New member
Mar 6, 2009
247
0
0
if he was just a simple soldier, fine. but an officer in a concentration camp. he had to have barked orders. I'm not hiding that.
 

Diablo27

New member
Jul 18, 2010
301
0
0
It'd be a very hard decision but my faith has taught me that everyone deserves a second chance.
 

ScorpSt

New member
Mar 18, 2010
167
0
0
Being repentant doesn't mean they get to pull a Karmic Houdini. I would probably try to convince the man to turn himself in. I'd be willing to serve as a character witness and help provide proof that he has changed, but I could not bring myself to lie under direct questioning.
 

Frotality

New member
Oct 25, 2010
982
0
0
i wouldnt harbor a saintly schoolgirl that stole a piece of candy. what am i, the underground railroad? he can deal with his own problems, nazi or otherwise.

that i said, as much as we love to vilify them, germany doesnt just happen to be the world's biggest repository of evil, and most nazis were people like any other. in the same dangerously desperate situation alot of german citizens were in at the time, i can bet a great deal of people here would have jumped at the opportunity to join the SS. most knew only what their country told them about soldiers, which was propaganda, and then they were indoctrinated by fear into committing whatever atrocities they were told to. we have the nazis themselves to look back on, but imagine if you were there; you wouldnt have any instantly recognizable army of evil to compare this act to, you would have nothing but your superior officer telling you to butcher a family of strangers or have your own family butchered; to torture a civilian or be tortured. no one will ever admit it, and most never have to, but put into that situation a great deal of people would do anything they claim they would never do if the stakes are high enough. human motivations are not so simple that we can just ignore the extreme circumstances and claim anyone who contributed to what the nazis collectively did is irredeemably evil. that doesnt excuse any of it, but it annoys how quickly people get on their high horse and claim they could never do anything remotely as bad as what the nazis did; there is always a hypothetical situation were EVERYONE, from hitler to mother therasa would commit any given heinous atrocity, as much as we like to deny it.

...and if didnt, youd be dead, and i wouldnt have to worry about harboring you.
 

Votix

New member
Apr 2, 2010
16
0
0
I would turn him in, hoping that he will get fair trial. However he was a ranking officer so... He must of gave orders. It would also depend if he had choice in the matter if he joined or was forced to join in the army. What did he do exactly? How did he murder them? Those are the questions I would ask.
 

Rottweiler

New member
Jan 20, 2008
258
0
0
Anyone who *still* has to hide due to fear over war crimes...wasn't a 'Guard'.

I don't have numbers in front of me but 'Concentration Camp Guards' weren't hanged at the Nuremburg trials, and the vast majority of soldiers involved were more or less let go.

If someone came to me this long after the events, and is still terrified? That man has a Name and probably Israelis hunting his ass.

Honestly, the question is invalid to me because of this.
 

Infernai

New member
Apr 14, 2009
2,605
0
0
If he was just a regular grunt or soldier, yeah i would hide him. But...he was an officer, meaning he had some degree of authority. So yeah, i would turn him in.