Assuming time is linear and not unraveling as it happened. you're theory is that time is that the future is pre-determined, and nobody knows for sure that that's true.Souplex said:
Not to be a dick, but I'm just pointing that out. >_>
Poll: would you kill baby hitler?
- Thread starter DudeistBelieve
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Not to be a dick, but I'm just pointing that out. >_>
Regardless, try to justify killing a baby.
If anything you should prevent him from being taught the racial superiority idea.
If anything you should prevent him from being taught the racial superiority idea.
Your mere presence there disrupts the timestream and causes untold changes. True, you would be unaffected, because reactionary instances from the divergent causality would no longer affect you. It would change the world around you, but it would not change you personally.
I mean its something that hasn't been proven for sure, it explains the phenomenon we see, but we can't state it as fact.Souplex said:
Wouldn't kill him if I can go back in time to see him as a baby. I'll try to get his parents to raise him as a more sociable person or something. I'll be a friend who'd try to keep this angst-ridden bastard from killing anyone. AND I'LL KEEP HIM AWAY FROM POLITICS, that's one of the most important. He just had a backwards retarded life, and had a backwards retarded way of responding to it (like, uh, oh I dunno, killing millions of people to relieve angst). The only time I see it reasonable to kill is to defend myself or those that I care about. If he hasn't done anything yet, no reason to be such a psycho, just raise the little scamp right.
I couldn't kill a baby, and I wouldn't kill Hitler. You know who I'd kill? Harry J. Fucking Anslinger. He was way worse, more insidious and for much longer than Hitler.
well if you did it like that you'd get a time paradox
killing hitler results in no need to kill hitler, thus you would never be offered to go back in time to kill hitler, thus never killing hitler, thus creating a need to kill baby hitler, ect.
but other than the paradox thing yes i'd kill baby hitler
killing hitler results in no need to kill hitler, thus you would never be offered to go back in time to kill hitler, thus never killing hitler, thus creating a need to kill baby hitler, ect.
but other than the paradox thing yes i'd kill baby hitler
Killing Hitler wouldn't stop the war or it's horrors. All this would do would be to change the dates when the war started and ended.
If you know your history, rather than subscribe to the "the world can be easily be classified in Black & White, Right & Wrong, Good & Evil, Hitler & Ghandi", then you will know that Germany was forced to take all the blame for the previous World War (as the losers who caused the most damage to France and Britain) and was in the simplest of terms "being bullied" by the rest of the European powers. This caused great resentment towards their lot in life and the rest of the world, throughout the German populace. If not Hitler, then someone else would have taken his place as a warmongering nationalistic extremist (the details are too much for me to get into here, but that specific type of leadership was very appealing to the German populace at the time).
I don't deny Hitler being a madman, an opportunistic warmonger, a racist, and a political extremist. But I am getting tired of him being presented as "the ultimate form of evil". He was a human being, and like all of us he had his good points, as well as bad (Vegetarian Dog-lover, who managed to earn the love of a woman). My belief is that he must have been somewhat psychologically disturbed, in order to actively seek the utter annihilation of an ethnic group and cleanse humanity of genetic variety (At least I hope one has to be, to seek to achieve such atrocities. Then again, he simply gave orders at a distance. So shouldn't we be dismissing the masses of human beings who carried out these deeds as mentally unstable?).
If you know your history, rather than subscribe to the "the world can be easily be classified in Black & White, Right & Wrong, Good & Evil, Hitler & Ghandi", then you will know that Germany was forced to take all the blame for the previous World War (as the losers who caused the most damage to France and Britain) and was in the simplest of terms "being bullied" by the rest of the European powers. This caused great resentment towards their lot in life and the rest of the world, throughout the German populace. If not Hitler, then someone else would have taken his place as a warmongering nationalistic extremist (the details are too much for me to get into here, but that specific type of leadership was very appealing to the German populace at the time).
I don't deny Hitler being a madman, an opportunistic warmonger, a racist, and a political extremist. But I am getting tired of him being presented as "the ultimate form of evil". He was a human being, and like all of us he had his good points, as well as bad (Vegetarian Dog-lover, who managed to earn the love of a woman). My belief is that he must have been somewhat psychologically disturbed, in order to actively seek the utter annihilation of an ethnic group and cleanse humanity of genetic variety (At least I hope one has to be, to seek to achieve such atrocities. Then again, he simply gave orders at a distance. So shouldn't we be dismissing the masses of human beings who carried out these deeds as mentally unstable?).
I dont mean to sound... Cruel, but things happened that way for a reason. Ever see the movie The Butterfly Effect? There's a quote at the beginning that says "It has been said that something as small as the flutter of a butterfly's wing can ultimately cause a typhoon halfway around the world - Chaos Theory." Point being if you change one thing, you change everything; Such minor changes, such huge consequences; The end is only the beginning. So no, as much as it probably would do the world good, and as much as I wish WWII and the Holocaust hadn't happened, I wouldn't go change anything.
everything is a theory. there is no way to undeniably prove a theory with no chance of it being dis proven. ideas we know as fact can be and are changed all the time. they did tests to prove that the world was flat. you send a ship in any direction and it disappears, so the ship must have fallen of the edge. this limited human thinking theory scales in complexity of all theories.
no...because Hitler wasn't born evil, he learned his evil ways.
So, all you have to do with baby Hitler is give him a good upbringing, free from evil and then he will b a nice dude. Not infamous for being a Jew murderer.
So, all you have to do with baby Hitler is give him a good upbringing, free from evil and then he will b a nice dude. Not infamous for being a Jew murderer.