Poll: Would you rather live in a world with vampires and no nukes, or nukes and no vampires?

Recommended Videos

letsnoobtehpwns

New member
Dec 28, 2008
1,628
0
0
Nukes because I hate whales. Although, having vampires would be nice. Girls would know that vampires aren't anything like Edward Cullen.
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
Vampires and no nukes because you can always fight vampires. There's no fighting having your skin melt off your face.
 

The Kangaroo

New member
Feb 24, 2009
1,481
0
0
effilctar said:
As long as it's PROPER vampires and not the faggots from twilight that sparkle.
Like the darren Shan ones? They were awesome and I'd want to be half Vampire
 

MiserableOldGit

New member
Apr 1, 2009
553
0
0
WrongSprite said:
Hmm....

How many vampires?
Ah, thats interesting. You see, as creatures that cannot die we have to carefully control numbers, so you have to apply to turn someone at the DUA (dept. for undead admissions). Without the correct forms, vamps are hunted down like dogs and killed slowly and painfully, or worse, forced through the appeal process.
Did I say we? They.
 

Neonbob

The Noble Nuker
Dec 22, 2008
25,564
0
0
letsnoobtehpwns said:
Nukes because I hate whales. Although, having vampires would be nice. Girls would know that vampires aren't anything like Edward Cullen.
Were you trying to get some affection?
Because you just earned it.
Right there.
*hands pamphlet*
That's a schedule of planned drops.
Stop by if you're still interested.
 

MiserableOldGit

New member
Apr 1, 2009
553
0
0
Spygon said:
a world with nukes isnt that the world we live into day.Or did the governments of the world announce that they were all lieing because they all thought the other side had nukes.
Yep- thats the point- that real world threats like muggers, rapsits, nukes, etc are scarier than made up ones, thus mooting the horror genre.
Mind you, it got lost in the vamp chat so I can see why you'd miss that. Probably should have picked a different example. Oh well, you live and learn-unless you get nuked or sucked dry...
 

Kiutu

New member
Sep 27, 2008
1,787
0
0
sgtshock said:
Nukes. They've never been used in anger since 1945, and they were pretty much what prevented the cold war from turning hot. For all we know, we could be speaking Russian now.
Or they could be speaking english.
 

AkJay

New member
Feb 22, 2009
3,555
0
0
sgtshock said:
Nukes. They've never been used in anger since 1945, and they were pretty much what prevented the cold war from turning hot. For all we know, we could be speaking Russian now.
Spoken like a true comrade.
 

bigolbear

New member
May 18, 2009
185
0
0
RavingPenguin said:
Neonbob said:
Give. Me. My. Nukes.
There is no other option for me.
Of course you cant nuke whales without nukes after all. *[sub]I wonder if you can make vampire whales... Hmmmmm...[/sub]

I vote vampires, they'd spice up life a whole lot more.
perhaps we could nuke wales instead? (note the spelling)... come on.. plz.

On the matter of nukes vs vampirs id prefer a world with vampires - cos i can rip a vampire apart with my teeth and claws (note my avater plz) but newkiller testing makes the earth warmer which makes me uncomfortable and also leaves me kinda homeless. Id suggest finding any vampires we can if they do exist strapping them to all the nukes, then posibly just fire them at the heart of the sun... or wales.

if america had no nukes would it have dropped vampires on japan, and what would godzilla have had to say about it?
 

effilctar

New member
Jul 24, 2009
1,495
0
0
eoin90210 said:
effilctar said:
As long as it's PROPER vampires and not the faggots from twilight that sparkle.
Like the darren Shan ones? They were awesome and I'd want to be half Vampire
Darren Shan is amazing but I'd rather stick to traditional vampires