I always wondered about that...I would have to say probably not...but then thats was giz monkeys are for.Tarlane said:Does the holodeck self-squeegee?
I can see why you might be ethically against porn but why self pleasure? Not everyone has someone there to do it for them and it certainly caries less risk of infection.InnerRebellion said:As someone who is against porn and self-pleasure, I will say no, I would not.
You say that like wanting it for porn means you can do nothing else with it.pigmypython said:Or would you use it for something else more spiritually fulfilling?
People you know in real life? How dull. Also slightly creepy. Isn't that the holodeck version of masturbating to someone's photo? Ick.pigmypython said:Personally I would be really tempted to re-create all the past girlfriends, hotties I had a crush on back in the day, and hot co-workers and have gratuitous sex with them all day and night. Hmmm probably never get any work done...evil technology.
so then we download the hack after they crack the holodeck drm in a week. next problemSteve5513 said:Only problem I see is that there will undoubtedly be a group of people who would campaign to have holodecks with built in features to prevent you from recreating real life people.
My circle of friends is made up of mostly girls, and I've subconsciously adopted the idea that self-pleasure is a stupid thing. As for me being against porn, it has to do with me being erotophobic, which is also another reason for me being against self-pleasure. My views have no religious base, due to me being an atheist.pigmypython said:I can see why you might be ethically against porn but why self pleasure? Not everyone has someone there to do it for them and it certainly caries less risk of infection.InnerRebellion said:As someone who is against porn and self-pleasure, I will say no, I would not.
Not judging just curious.
We can only hope!manaman said:Then the porn industry would get their claws into it, prices would drop and soon after there would be one in every home.