I'm not for pirating a newer game simply because you're too damn lazy to buy it, but there are times where it can be a good thing. When people pirate to demo a game or see if it will work properly on their system, then it can actually help sales. (Unless the game sucks, but if that's the case then why should we care whether or not a crappy game sold well?) As for pirating older games, it depends for me. Sometimes old games are hard to find or so rare that they're ridiculously overpriced. And since the developers aren't going to see a cent of that anyways, then there really isn't any harm in pirating it. (And before someone chimes in and says the seller is a victim, there is ALWAYS another buyer. Trust me, I've had experience in the used games market) But if they're still being sold through compilation packs or a downloading service, then I say buy it.
Oh, and in light of the Ubisoft controversy, I'm not sure where I stand on pirating out of protest. I'm gonna have to wait and see what happens with that. Either Ubi clamps down harder on piracy, or they learn their lesson and drop this retarded DRM. We should find out in about a month or so, I think.
So yes, I think pirating can be justified. And yes, I've heard the counter-arguments, and I still find them to be (mostly) bullshit. The two most common ones I hear is that pirating is a crime and is therefore wrong no matter what you do, and that developers have a right to protect their software, which means you should buy it. Both ring true, but that doesn't make them argument stoppers. In regards to the first, there's a reason pirating is so rampant. It's because hardly anyone cares that it's a crime. If the FBI were to seriously start prosecuting everyone who pirates, there would be millions upon millions in jail. Yeah, they occasionally bust someone to try to scare everyone else, but the reality is that it rarely happens and the scare tactic doesn't work. Yeah, it's a crime, albeit an extremely petty one and in a lot of cases, victimless.
As for developers having a right to defend their property, I simply say we consumers also have a right to defend our money. I have always said that PC developers should always put out a demo. People can see if they like it and test it out to see if it will run properly on their system. After all, if you buy a PC game, you can't really return it. You can get some of your money back perhaps, but basically you've wasted money. While it is true you need to know your specs before you buy a game, you can't always get a good picture of how the game will run just by looking at the chart on the back of the box. For those of you with high end systems, fine. But I've seen plenty of gamers who have specs that are relatively mixed. For example, I have a high quality processor, a good sound card, and tons of RAM, but my video card is a little unreliable. (And no, I won't "just upgrade it." The computer was a gift and I'm not made of money) Some current games work great, others work like crap. If I'm not sure how it will run, then I look for a torrent. If it runs fine, I buy the game. If it doesn't, I delete all data and never look at it again. And don't give me the "You're just justifying this heinous crime" argument. Save that argument for someone who pirates truly just because they're too lazy to buy it. Or would you rather I let developers make me their ***** and rip me off since they didn't put out a demo?
As for developers having a right to defend their property, I simply say we consumers also have a right to defend our money. I have always said that PC developers should always put out a demo. People can see if they like it and test it out to see if it will run properly on their system. After all, if you buy a PC game, you can't really return it. You can get some of your money back perhaps, but basically you've wasted money. While it is true you need to know your specs before you buy a game, you can't always get a good picture of how the game will run just by looking at the chart on the back of the box. For those of you with high end systems, fine. But I've seen plenty of gamers who have specs that are relatively mixed. For example, I have a high quality processor, a good sound card, and tons of RAM, but my video card is a little unreliable. (And no, I won't "just upgrade it." The computer was a gift and I'm not made of money) Some current games work great, others work like crap. If I'm not sure how it will run, then I look for a torrent. If it runs fine, I buy the game. If it doesn't, I delete all data and never look at it again. And don't give me the "You're just justifying this heinous crime" argument. Save that argument for someone who pirates truly just because they're too lazy to buy it. Or would you rather I let developers make me their ***** and rip me off since they didn't put out a demo?
Oh, and in light of the Ubisoft controversy, I'm not sure where I stand on pirating out of protest. I'm gonna have to wait and see what happens with that. Either Ubi clamps down harder on piracy, or they learn their lesson and drop this retarded DRM. We should find out in about a month or so, I think.