woah what part of america did you go to?interspark said:i hate guns, theres no just reason for owning one much less using it, i mean, dont get me wrong, ive got nothing against target shooting and stuff but i just hate places like america where everyone over the age of 6 has one in their pocket like its perfectly normal
guns are like armies and lawyers, if no-one had them, no-one would need them
Not so sure about this one. I think there are enough people who'll go: "Whoa! Cool! Let's try it out on something!" Well, I think it will go that way over here, because guns aren't legal to carry and thus a bit of a forbidden fruit.Jroo wuz heer said:I think guns should be commissioned by tthe government to EVERYONE. saying that this shouldnt happen is like saying we should saw peoples fists off, if everyone has a gun, noone will use it
Unfortunately the population you'd be left with would be the most criminal people and the most jumpy people.DividedUnity said:What better way to deal with over-population than to get rid of gun restrictions
Actually, most towns with very high gun-ownership have VERY low crime. Places with low gun ownership have the opposite: Look at Detroit or DC. They're hell holes. At least Detroit has economic reasons for sucking.Jack_Uzi said:Not so sure about this one. I think there are enough people who'll go: "Whoa! Cool! Let's try it out on something!" Well, I think it will go that way over here, because guns aren't legal to carry and thus a bit of a forbidden fruit.Jroo wuz heer said:I think guns should be commissioned by tthe government to EVERYONE. saying that this shouldnt happen is like saying we should saw peoples fists off, if everyone has a gun, noone will use it
that might happen in the first generation that gets guns, but after that it would be perfectly normalJack_Uzi said:Not so sure about this one. I think there are enough people who'll go: "Whoa! Cool! Let's try it out on something!" Well, I think it will go that way over here, because guns aren't legal to carry and thus a bit of a forbidden fruit.Jroo wuz heer said:I think guns should be commissioned by tthe government to EVERYONE. saying that this shouldnt happen is like saying we should saw peoples fists off, if everyone has a gun, noone will use it
You should give the movie "Idiocracy" a look if you haven't already. It is not scientific, but does pertain to your point.deathandtaxes said:Only in countries which don't have sensible education systems is death by anything preventable such as idiots using guns common, it's obvious when you look at guns. If people were forced to learn about firearms as part of public education then their would be far fewer deaths by natural selection.
The same principle can be applied to anything from Sex education to driving if people are not taught about how to do things safely and effectively then people will die it is as simple as that.
I always question it's use for self-defence. Said scumbags aren't known for their high intelligence, and instead of being deterred I reckon that they'd arm themselves sooner than not being a scumbag. Plus, wielding a weapon makes you a dangerous target, one an armed mugger is more prone to take out than an unarmed man who surrenders it's wallet. Afterall, the mugger or burglar has the surprise effect on you. You can arm yourself all you want, but if he's got a gun or knife aimed at you it's suicide to grab for your own weapon.blue_lame93@hotmail.com said:I have a question for you, have you ever used a weapon of any form to save yourself or another person? i'm guessing no. majority of people who have weapons, have them as a last resort or scare tactic, wether you live in a shitty part of america or just happen to know that there will be scumbags where your going your gonna feel a hell of alot less likely to be injured with said weapon
But is that thanks to the guns or thanks to the fact that such towns are usually not very urbanised. My village barely has any crime too but you'll barely find so much as an air rifle here.Koeryn said:Actually, most towns with very high gun-ownership have VERY low crime. Places with low gun ownership have the opposite: Look at Detroit or DC. They're hell holes. At least Detroit has economic reasons for sucking.
No, someone will use their gun and all hell will break loose. Every society has mentally ill people, some have no fear, or are just crazy. "but just don't give them one" you say, well the symptoms often do not show, and it takes something to set them off, but once they have gone off bad things happen (columbine, Dawson college). Further many people, even with training will have crappy aim, or miss occasionally. So if a situation arises where one must use their gun, like a crime taking place, they can miss. If 20 people in a shop shoot at the criminal, there is a good chance someone will get hit in the crossfire.Jroo wuz heer said:I think guns should be commissioned by tthe government to EVERYONE. saying that this shouldnt happen is like saying we should saw peoples fists off, if everyone has a gun, noone will use it
IN the hands of the police or other law enforcement. At least, in my eyes.interspark said:im sorry, not trying to be rude but in what scenario would guns be a blessing?JRCB said:Firearms are a danger in the wrong hands, and a blessing in the right ones. I'm alright with civilians having them, as long as they are sane, functioning members of society.