DrScoobs said:
- Pornography completely objectifies women
- It sets unrealistic standards for real sex
- Many sex slaves in the world are linked to pornography
- 98% of female performers in pornography are unhappy (Apparently from a real study according to him)
- Lack of pornography would mean a drop in sexual crimes (I think completely the opposite)
- Stops children getting their hands on porno by accident
- If pornography was banned, it would mean a drop in human trafficking (again, an opinion I think completely the opposite to)
A. So does most of the media. Therefore I think we should ban the news.
2. This is a true, but just like most media you need to be mature enough to view/play it.
C. 98 percent of my coworkers are unhappy with their jobs. Lets get rid of restaurants. Honestly, I think I know 5 people total who are happy with their job. Those people are older and have established themselves in a career. Also, why just females? Porn isn't a walk in the park for males either. At least women make 3-5 times more money. By the way, ask for a source on that. That number seems
way too high.
D. What is the reasoning for that? Also, what constitutes a "sexual crime"? Rape? Bad touch? Me staring at someone's cleavage?
E. We should also ban sharp things, electricity, and stove tops so children don't get into those by accident.
F. Here's the thing with human trafficking: it is illegal already. People are still going to do it if a medium becomes illegal. (also I seemed to have skipped the third point you listed. This addresses that one too.)