portal 2 trolls

Recommended Videos

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Bill Bread said:
Forget whether it's voluntary or not, that isn't what defines if something's a shitty deal or not
Annndddd your point? Its optional. Its not gonna ruin the game that you got a good deal. If I bought a car, I'm not gonna tell all my friends that it sucks just because the dealer offered to add a DvD player for it for an extra 1,000 dollars now am I?
 

cplsharp

New member
Jul 20, 2010
74
0
0
For anyone not from the UK, these comments from the channel 5 website and the thoughts of the dribbling fools who watch the Wright Stuff show here is something for you to mull over.


Vivienne Percy
Violence breeds violence...... Anyone considered that the people who play and are affected by these violent games may have a subconscious view that - if its in a game it must be ok..... these hideous games should be banned and its time that parents went back to being involved with what their kids are doing and say no to what is clearly unacceptable in a civilised society.


lynxdeffect
i think that some people have been brought up on these violent games think they have about 4 or 5 lives as in a computer game themselves. plus he was probably brought up in a war torn country before his family came here and where did he get a sub machine gun in the first place

oh, and as if thats bad enough a chubby girl had a photoshoot done for the paper, and what was the shows reaction ?

IS IT PROMOTING UNHEALTHY EATING AND POOR SELF CARE...... are they a bit loose up top ?
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Yopaz said:
Actually I find it funny that the OP calls them trolls without having played the game himself. So he says that the 'trolls' are wrong without being able to judge it by himself. Thank you sir, I agree with you fully. Not everyone on the internet is a troll, someone does have different opinions than me.
arragonder said:
lol, people don't like portal 2, thus they're obviously trolls because everyone that disagrees with the OP is a troll, right?
What part of 90% of these 0/10 reviews are simply complaining about "Day 1 DLC" that doesn't exist could you not comprehend? Nobody is saying the game is bad [well some are, but frankly if they think the game is bad they must hold impossible standards], they're simply complaining that they have to pay for a few useless co-op skins...

cplsharp said:
For anyone not from the UK, these comments from the channel 5 website and the thoughts of the dribbling fools who watch the Wright Stuff show here is something for you to mull over.
What does this have to do with anything?
 

SwagLordYoloson

New member
Jul 21, 2010
784
0
0
dohteM said:
Xzi said:
Bill Bread said:
Xzi said:
You're right, it was a terrible analogy. The rear parking sensors actually change the way your car works in some small way. It's more like paying $5000 for a car and then complaining about not getting some wicked awesome flame stickers to put on the side. Derp.
If you'd paid for a good paint job and then you didn't get one, then yeah, that's a reasonably good analogy.
No, I'm not talking about the paint job, I'm literally taking about fucking stickers. That's what this is. The game looks prettier than hell already, so the good paint job is there. If you choose to customize it further, as a six-year-old girl might do with her Barbie, good on you I suppose. Me? I'll take the fire-red Ferrari as it is.
Fire is actually orange.
This statement is the most sensicle out of any reply to this thread

OT: on the topic of trolls, with that same logic it could be assumed that the author is a troll for creating a topic with so much heated discussion with people arguing back and forth. For all we know he could be sniggering behind his desk laughing at all the replies coming in...
 

The Lawn

New member
Apr 11, 2008
600
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
3. It's not 3 hours. Not even close.
I beat the game in about 2 and a half hours.
But then I was trying to beat it as fast as possible, I will play though again slowly while exploring because that's how I get enjoyment out of games.
 

DasUberCow

New member
May 26, 2009
112
0
0
Xzi said:
Bill Bread said:
So, if Bungie were to withold the armour customisation and charge you £28 to be able to customise your appearance in Halo Reach you people wouldn't be irate?
Well, I'm hardly surprised at this point.
I wouldn't buy a Halo game to begin with. And besides, that's a game that you'll be playing online primarily, with several different people in every new match. This is a 7 or 8 hour long co-op campaign that you'll likely only play through once or twice. Do you really give half a shit about ONE other person seeing your non-standard robot? If so, that person's decision of whether not to have sex with you better be hinging on the matter.
POST OF THE CENTURY!

I want to pay for your children's education or something.

OT : No, i don't think people should ***** about day one DLC. Yes, i think we all agree review scores are outdated but that each point does have some validity in terms of value and developer integrity.

Looking forward to enjoying this game with a friend when i get back from Easter holiday a week and a day in the future.
 

Paularius

New member
May 25, 2010
211
0
0
I dont get why anyone would WANT the hats and all that crap. Took me and a friend 4 hours to complete co-op and well.. that was it... theres no challanges or extra levels to go through. Nothing to really get good use out of the store items. Not great replayability. Would possably play the co-op maybe another time or two but theres nothing to keep you coming back to it.
 

geckorus10

New member
Nov 11, 2010
13
0
0
here are the things we DON'T have to do:
buy portals
buy levels
buy co-op
buy respawns

here are the things we HAVE to do:
play the game

here are OPTIONAL things:
find all the easter eggs
get achievements
buy cosmetic changes, which can be acquired via earning achievements, so this can just be ruled out for people who think with portals

besides, now that portal 2 is out of the way we may see HL2:EP3 real soon
 

ParkourMcGhee

New member
Jan 4, 2008
1,219
0
0
liveslowdiefast said:
ok so i'm on meta critic and i'm looking though the reviews for portal 2. and two things strike me, first of all people are saying the game took the "3 hours to beat", i mean i haven't played it yet (i inted to buy it when i have the funds) but surley they must just be lying. the amount of content can not be able to wizzed though in three hours. and secondly i found people were judging it on the offers coming with the game, such as the day one DLC and they were not properly juding the game purley the controvercy around it. surely this is just people being ridiculos.
Took me about 5 hours for single player, and 8 for multi. - both first time round, and I'm sure I could cut it down.

I loved it to be honest :)
 

Nfritzappa

New member
Apr 1, 2010
323
0
0
Took me 8 hours, and I loved every minute of it.
Can't wait to try the coop mode.
Everything about this game is fantastic, its "Portal Perfect" of course.
The end literally made me jump with excitement. Great game, for once the reviewers are right.
 

razer17

New member
Feb 3, 2009
2,518
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
3 things:

3. It's not 3 hours. Not even close. But they do have a (slightly) legitimate complaint in the case of Day 1 DLC.
It's a very slight complaint. Certainly not worth a 0 score (A couple even gave 0 purely for the Potato Sack thing, which makes no sense to me, no one forced yo to buy heavily discounted indie games), but it's not like they are with holding the ending from people, it's purely a microtransaction model where you can buy hats. You can do that in TF2, I don't remember that getting zero-bombed. My point being it's just an incredibly petty reason to hate a game.

Valve is a business, and a business needs to make money.Hell, the more money Portal 2 makes, the more money they get for whatever their next project is.

(Also, in strange coincidence, my reCaptcha code was "non zero")
 

Theron Julius

New member
Nov 30, 2009
731
0
0
Complaints I read on metacritic:

too short
shitty graphics
easy puzzles
unoriginal

There is not ONE of these that my experience with the game does not flat out contradict. I've been playing for around 4 hours and I'm guessing that I'm only around half way through (3 hours my ass), the graphics are pretty damn nice, and some of the puzzles are actually pretty damn challenging. The label of "unoriginal" is complete bullshit. It's probably just idiots who saw 2 at the end of the name and simply can't understand that Valve can actually make sequels well.
 

TrogzTheTroll

New member
Aug 11, 2009
429
0
0
I like Portal 2, I don't have to buy hats since it does nothing on the amount I enjoy Portal 2.

Thread dismissed.
 

Podunk

New member
Dec 18, 2008
822
0
0
The problem with the people who ***** about Portal's length is that they did not time it the first time through. Everyone played the game and dug it, then when they went back and played it again they paid more attention and it took an hour. The same shit is going to happen with Portal 2 because it's still primarily a puzzle game. I can rattle off a list of games on Kongregate that are so super short because I can breeze through all the levels in under five minutes.

Furthermore, the whole hat nonsense is stupid. They didn't advertise hats as a selling point, it wasn't anything anybody was eagerly anticipating. It's just a bonus extra that is kinda cute for those who love TF2. Of all the problems with Modern gaming this is not a big deal.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
dohteM said:
Xzi said:
Bill Bread said:
Xzi said:
You're right, it was a terrible analogy. The rear parking sensors actually change the way your car works in some small way. It's more like paying $5000 for a car and then complaining about not getting some wicked awesome flame stickers to put on the side. Derp.
If you'd paid for a good paint job and then you didn't get one, then yeah, that's a reasonably good analogy.
No, I'm not talking about the paint job, I'm literally taking about fucking stickers. That's what this is. The game looks prettier than hell already, so the good paint job is there. If you choose to customize it further, as a six-year-old girl might do with her Barbie, good on you I suppose. Me? I'll take the fire-red Ferrari as it is.
Fire is actually orange.
Not always!






I want to build a ferrari out of strontium. THEN SET THAT ***** ON FIRE and drive it into the bioware offices as punishment for the actual day one DLC on DA:O.

This portal business is simply attracting attention because of its popularity.
 

pwnzerstick

New member
Mar 25, 2009
592
0
0
Im not complaining, its optional. But I do think that it would have made more sense for the skins and hats to be unlockable through in game actions rather than through purchasing.