wait wait wait wait....
I thought Prince died years ago? christ, when was the last time he was relevant.
I thought Prince died years ago? christ, when was the last time he was relevant.
Thats the longest reply I have ever gotten, you sir should get a medal.Therumancer said:U71L7Y_F0RMUL4 said:I thought he changed his name to some sort of symbol?
OT: He couldn't be more wrong if he tried.
EDIT: It would be the end of the world if the internet stopped working. Hasn't he seen that South Park episode?He referred to himself as "The Artist Formerly Known As Prince" for a while and had his written stage name replaced with a symbol. This was over a contract dispute where he apparently couldn't perform under his stage name unless he agreed to do things he didn't want to and give up a bunch of money. This bit was actually pretty clever, as he even turned a disclosure clause into a gimmick by keeping things mysterious and not coming clean until after the contract expired. I don't remember all the details, but he stopped doing it, and it was all explained. A lot of other people would have stopped performing under the circumstances, so I have to give him a certain amount of credit.
Otherwise I think what he's saying about the internet is simply wishful thinking on his part. It's neither a bad thing, nor something that is going away since it's not a "gimmick" but technological progression much like video images were, which some people also called a fad.
I think one of the issues involved here is that things like digital distribution have gotten to the heart of the concept of "intellectual properties", and ownership. I think a big part of the issue is that the letter of the matter has not been a major issue before this level of technological innovation, and it's upset a lot of people who rightfully see a lot of aspects of IP rights as being inherantly wrong when it was not really an issue when physical media existed.
Well that, and greed. Improved statistical tracking has convinced a lot of people somehow that piracy (which is wrong) equates directly to lost sales, and that somehow those pirating would have bought the property in question (or the right to use it) if they hadn't been able to pirate it. This is fundementally untrue, however in the final equasion greed is greed and the mere suspician by some guy who made 10 million dollars that he could have made 20 million is enough to whip him into a frothing rage most of the time.
In the final equasion though I think piracy is simply the most public issue, because being wrong it's the one that media industries can most easily attack. One of the reasons why I think a lot of people are very lukewarm to IP laws is the fact that by the logic used by some of these artists it would be a crime to say lend someone a book, or (as guys like Harlan Ellison have pushed) or for school teachers to copy media to distribute to students.
What's more I think services like Youtube bring up some interesting questions. For example I am not 100% comfortable with an artist of any stature forcing down a video of a kid dancing to their music. I feel doing stuff like that and showing it off is part of the legitimate usage of the medium. Of course the flip side is (as argued) that someone who sees that video is hearing the music for free.
Without going into the letter of the law, I kind of see things like Youtube as being similar to a publically accessible park. Just as it would be ridiculous to arrest someone for putting down a radio and dancing in a park because someone walking by might hear the song, I also think it's ridiculous to do the same on Youtube, the sole differance being the number of people in the potential audience.
The point being that while I think Prince is wrong on what is happening to the internet, and that it will disappear as a "fad", I do see where he's coming from. It's arguably not an easy issue and while piracy is theft, I think extending "piracy" to include things like youtube videos, fan sites, and similar things is going too far.
To put things into perspective, rulings akin to what Prince seems like he would want, would effectively give media owners an incredible amount of latitude to control free speech and behavior. I have my problems with private networks and sites being able to censor and ban people without appeal as it is (since the goverment can't even censor people like that... and it's an increasing issue when pretty much all platforms of mass communication are private), I see Intellectual Property issues turning into something very similar over time if a lot of the artists have their way. One of those things where what is right, right now, is not the right thing in the big picture as it can snowball into much bigger problems than the piracy issue that people are tying to address. With the fortunes still being made (and lost) I also don't see any kind of massive nessecity, it's not like were facing a crisis where the entire creative industry will die out in three months if it's not stopped. Lesser of two evils and all that (but then again, if you think it's costing you a fortune, you might not see it that way... or not care about the long term as long as you get yours).
Congrats to those who read this far.
lostzombies.com said:"The internet's like MTV. At one time MTV was hip and suddenly it became outdated. Anyway, all these computers and digital gadgets are no good. They just fill your head with numbers and that can't be good for you."
Clearly a highly-respected an knowledgeable bastion of humanity. Fighting the good fight against those numbers and gadgets and stuff. Yeah.Clirck said:Who's Prince?
Who the hell said THAT?!tellmeimaninja said:Because Prince is hip.
He's the cool daddy-o with the youngsters.
Seriously, this guy is an ignorant douche with just about everything he says.
Also, this reminds me of a certain asshat who said "Ah, motion pictures are just a passing fad."
That is just CORRECT dude! CORRECT!lostzombies.com said:"Prince" , the man with the ultimate pop music nickname which is strange because he is a stupid little fuck ,
thinks that being an idiot will make him very smart and he will soon get punched in the face by Chuck Norris.
"cause Prince is all gangsta y'all! and nobody is as smart as gangstas y'all!Sapient Pearwood said:Since when was his opinion worth noting? Are we going to have an article on my friend John's thoughts on the internet and how it affects society next?