Question of the Day, September 15, 2010

Recommended Videos

thublihnk

New member
Jul 24, 2009
395
0
0
I like how I got ninja'd by so many other people on what I thought would be clever.

Shadow of the Colossus, yeah. So important. So beautiful.
 

Sartan0

New member
Apr 5, 2010
538
0
0
Naheal said:
Other: None. The lack of art in the world would prevent inspiration from previous pieces of art. Originality would expand.
There are several things wrong with that Assertion.

First we would remember the previous works.

Next even if we somehow forgot a new body of work would soon inform later work.

Lastly if we still lived in the same world it would still inspire similar art most likely.
 

DragonChi

New member
Nov 1, 2008
1,243
0
0
I was actually in Italy last year in August. I saw the Sistine Chapel...my mouth couldnt stop being in the "dropped" position. There is SOOO much Artwork in there..to lose that would be astronomically upsetting. So that place by far is my choice.
 

Krion_Vark

New member
Mar 25, 2010
1,700
0
0
I would save myself because I am one hell of a piece of artwork. jeh jeh jeh

Actually I would probably have to save the Dog's Playing Poker. For the laughs of course. Or something that is done in Stain Glass because some of those things are just Epic pieces of art.
 

C95J

I plan to live forever.
Apr 10, 2010
3,491
0
0
hmmm, probably Mona Lisa because it is the most recognised... I think.
 

Karlaxx

New member
Oct 26, 2009
685
0
0
As much as the Catholic church can rub me the wrong way sometimes, I would save the Sistine Chapel; I prefer architecture to painting when it comes to judging the beauty of something.
 

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
Sistine Chapel I guess. It's the only one mentioned in the poll that looks half decent.