Azure Sky said:
Mock me at will, I would return the favor, but you need no help in doing that. ^^
Denial is bad, m'kay. =3
What a cop-out. Normally, I'd have stopped at the first sentence fragment, but since you decided to contradict me with absolutely nothing to back up what you're saying, I'm going to thoroughly explain why you're wrong.
I see your sense of irony is about as strong as a snake's ability to applaud. If you need me to elaborate, here's an explanation: you come to the defense of another user with nothing more to offer than "you're making assumptions", with absolutely nothing substantial to explain why it would be reasonable to say that I was doing so in the first place. A deliberate misinterpretation of my post would, indeed, allow one to accuse me of making the assumption of "HURR DURR, YOU HATE HALO, THEREFORE YOU HATE COD TOO, LOL I FIGGERD U OUT", but anyone with the ability to number all their fingers and toes would be able to understand that it was a denouncement of the smug, hipster mentality of "if I publicly say I hate popular things without any solicitation whatsoever, people will see how cool I am," which was so blatantly being displayed in a setting that is notorious for it.
You then assert that I'm making an ass out of myself while in denial, but leave the reasons for such declarations conspicuously absent (again; y'know, I think I'm beginning see a pattern, here), which makes it clear that you're setting yourself up to argue with an absolute gem of circular reasoning that is as follows:
10. My statement is more correct than yours because you're an idiot.
20. You're an idiot because nothing you can say will have any credence, because you're in denial.
30. You're in denial, because you're trying to argue with me when (go to 10).
Resorting to such childish tactics is a clear demonstration of a lack of substance, because you don't throw wiffle balls when you have grenades. And for the record, no, that last part doesn't count as an assumption, it counts as calling you on it before you run with it.
In short: you're accusing me of making baseless assumptions, completely oblivious to the fact that your accusations are infinitely more baseless and arbitrary than my own. The dictionary assures me that this can be described as "irony". Despite the fact that I have completely explained not only that which you call "assumptions", but also the reasons why your accusations are preposterous to begin with, I'm sure I can look forward to another "you're wrong because I say so" reply. Don't worry, I'll make time to tear that one apart, too.
Have a nice day.
