Quick Survey!

Recommended Videos

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
Male

Legally go for it, in a church no because of the Christian values they don't encourage it, it is the churches decision. So I don't know, put whatever you want

Strongly disagree. Human beings were biologically designed for intercourse with members of the opposite sex for reproduction. You mess with the biological reproduction psychology then you have a much higher chance of the child being a homosexual. While I don't mind that, biologically speaking it makes them as useful as a panda that refuses to mate and I hate pandas

EDIT: also to the people who are so left that they think there are no consequences from a totally gay society, stop asking the people who don't 100% agree to explain themselves. We aren't asking you, seems a bit unfair to make us justify our opinions
 

Amphoteric

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,276
0
0
Male
STRONGLY agree
STRONGLY agree

Anyone who thinks that Homosexual people should have different rights to Heterosexual people needs a swift kick to the balls/ovaries.
 

Amphoteric

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,276
0
0
Ahlycks said:
Lots of left wingers here.
Anyway,

1.Male
2.Neutral
3.Neutral

(As long as they don't try to stick there shlongs in my b-hole, I really do not give a crap)
Yes because Gay men are all sexual predators just looking for any chance to have sex with any man...
 

Amphoteric

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,276
0
0
The Rockerfly said:
Male
Legally go for it, in a church no. So I don't know, put whatever you want

Strongly disagree. Human beings were biologically designed for intercourse with members of the opposite sex for reproduction. You mess with the biological reproduction psychology then you have a much higher chance of the child being a homosexual. While I don't mind that, biologically speaking it makes them as useful as a panda that refuses to mate
You must be joking.
 

Evil the White

New member
Apr 16, 2009
918
0
0
Male
Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree

Studies have shown that gay parents do not affect a child's sexuality later in life. It will probably just mean that they are more open about that sort of thing.
 

Mr Fixit

New member
Oct 22, 2008
929
0
0
1. Male
2. Agree Hey if they wanna suffer too, let'em.
3. Agree Kids need homes, everyone needs a family.
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
Amphoteric said:
The Rockerfly said:
Male
Legally go for it, in a church no. So I don't know, put whatever you want

Strongly disagree. Human beings were biologically designed for intercourse with members of the opposite sex for reproduction. You mess with the biological reproduction psychology then you have a much higher chance of the child being a homosexual. While I don't mind that, biologically speaking it makes them as useful as a panda that refuses to mate
You must be joking.
Why must I be joking?

Amphoteric said:
Male
STRONGLY agree
STRONGLY agree

Anyone who thinks that Homosexual people should have different rights to Heterosexual people needs a swift kick to the balls/ovaries.
Donating blood...
 

CompetingMantis

New member
Nov 10, 2010
29
0
0
If this is a school project or something (as has been posited earlier in the thread), sounds like your results are gonna be way off against the rest of your class. The Escapist leans massively to the liberal, far as I can see.

Oh, and just to add to it:
1) Male
2) Strongly agree
3) Strongly agree

:p
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
captaincabbage said:
Madara XIII said:
1. Male
2. Disagree
3. Strongly Agree (Kids need homes man and gays are in no way incapable of raising children)
lol that was a curveball.

May I ask why you disagree with gay marriage? It's interesting to see a reply like this and I'd love to see some light shed on your opinions.

OT: as for me

Male
Strongly agree
Strongly agree
Well, it's quite a religious thing for me and I am at risk of getting flamed for it, but oh well I'm screwed either way. Sorry but in MY OPINION AND MY VIEW I see marriage as a Holy Matrimony between a man and a woman, while putting aside all the contractual bullshit and financials
(Just in case anyone doesn't notice the big words in bold, this is MY OPINION and I don't speak for everyone and I have a flipping right to it as long as I'm not doing harm to society.)
 

ajemas

New member
Nov 19, 2009
500
0
0
Male.
Strongly agree.
Strongly agree.
There is no reason why gay people should not be allowed to marry. I think that love can certainly exist between two people of the same gender, and that they should be allowed to have a child as well. Also, it could help clear out orphanages a bit, and give some impoverished children loving parents.